These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32442798)

  • 1. Intuitive biology, moral reasoning, and engineering life: Essentialist thinking and moral purity concerns shape risk assessments of synthetic biology technologies.
    Swiney L
    Cognition; 2020 Aug; 201():104264. PubMed ID: 32442798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Unfounded dumbfounding: How harm and purity undermine evidence for moral dumbfounding.
    Guglielmo S
    Cognition; 2018 Jan; 170():334-337. PubMed ID: 28803616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Can cognitive psychological research on reasoning enhance the discussion around moral judgments?
    Bialek M; Terbeck S
    Cogn Process; 2016 Aug; 17(3):329-35. PubMed ID: 27016146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Judgments of moral responsibility and wrongness for intentional and accidental harm and purity violations.
    Parkinson M; Byrne RMJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Mar; 71(3):779-789. PubMed ID: 28059634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Within your rights: Dissociating wrongness and permissibility in moral judgement.
    Murray S; Jiménez-Leal W; Amaya S
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2024 Jan; 63(1):340-361. PubMed ID: 37694975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Tainting the soul: purity concerns predict moral judgments of suicide.
    Rottman J; Kelemen D; Young L
    Cognition; 2014 Feb; 130(2):217-26. PubMed ID: 24333538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. With a clean conscience: cleanliness reduces the severity of moral judgments.
    Schnall S; Benton J; Harvey S
    Psychol Sci; 2008 Dec; 19(12):1219-22. PubMed ID: 19121126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The relevance of moral norms in distinct relational contexts: Purity versus harm norms regulate self-directed actions.
    Dungan JA; Chakroff A; Young L
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0173405. PubMed ID: 28278214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Physical Attractiveness Biases Judgments Pertaining to the Moral Domain of Purity.
    Klebl C; Rhee JJ; Greenaway KH; Luo Y; Bastian B
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2023 Feb; 49(2):282-295. PubMed ID: 34964373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A functional neuroimaging investigation of Moral Foundations Theory.
    Khoudary A; Hanna E; O'Neill K; Iyengar V; Clifford S; Cabeza R; De Brigard F; Sinnott-Armstrong W
    Soc Neurosci; 2022 Dec; 17(6):491-507. PubMed ID: 36378272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Wrongness in different relationships: Relational context effects on moral judgment.
    Simpson A; Laham SM; Fiske AP
    J Soc Psychol; 2016; 156(6):594-609. PubMed ID: 26751010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The role of conscious reasoning and intuition in moral judgment: testing three principles of harm.
    Cushman F; Young L; Hauser M
    Psychol Sci; 2006 Dec; 17(12):1082-9. PubMed ID: 17201791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Moral Reasoning Enables Developmental and Societal Change.
    Killen M; Dahl A
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2021 Nov; 16(6):1209-1225. PubMed ID: 33621472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Genetic and Environmental Influences on Biological Essentialism, Heuristic Thinking, Need for Closure, and Conservative Values: Insights From a Survey and Twin Study.
    Morosoli JJ; Barlow FK; Colodro-Conde L; Medland SE
    Behav Genet; 2022 May; 52(3):170-183. PubMed ID: 35368232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Asking 'why?' enhances theory of mind when evaluating harm but not purity violations.
    Dungan JA; Young L
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2019 Jul; 14(7):699-708. PubMed ID: 31269193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations.
    Graham J; Haidt J; Nosek BA
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2009 May; 96(5):1029-46. PubMed ID: 19379034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Dimensionality of the Moral Foundations: Contributions from the Moral Foundations Sacredness Scale in Four Societies.
    Costa PJC; Moreira PAS
    J Pers Assess; 2024; 106(3):361-371. PubMed ID: 37594306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reflection and reasoning in moral judgment.
    Paxton JM; Ungar L; Greene JD
    Cogn Sci; 2012; 36(1):163-77. PubMed ID: 22049931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Preschoolers learn new moral and conventional norms from direct experiences.
    Langenhoff AF; Dahl A; Srinivasan M
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2022 Mar; 215():105322. PubMed ID: 34871790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Harm concerns predict moral judgments of suicide: comment on Rottman, Kelemen and Young (2014).
    Gray K
    Cognition; 2014 Oct; 133(1):329-31. PubMed ID: 25023146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.