These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32442835)
1. Reduced-dose computed tomography is the most accurate method to measure ceramic hip resurfacing cup version. Saracco A; Grassi A; Romagnoli M; Camarda L; Logishetty K; Zaffagnini S; Cobb J Eur J Radiol; 2020 Jul; 128():109040. PubMed ID: 32442835 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Plain Radiographs are a Useful Substitute for Computed Tomography in Evaluating Acetabular Cup Version. Noback PC; Danoff JR; Herschmiller T; Bobman JT; Shah RP; Geller JA; Macaulay W J Arthroplasty; 2016 Oct; 31(10):2320-4. PubMed ID: 27181489 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. 2D measurements of cup orientation are less reliable than 3D measurements. Davda K; Smyth N; Cobb JP; Hart AJ Acta Orthop; 2015; 86(4):485-90. PubMed ID: 25674698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of plain antero-posterior radiographic-based methods for measurement of acetabular cup version. Alzohiry MA; Abdelnasser MK; Moustafa M; Mahran M; Bakr H; Khalifa Y; Abelaal A; Atta H; Said GZ Int Orthop; 2018 Dec; 42(12):2777-2785. PubMed ID: 29869012 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Minimal radiation dose computed tomography for measurement of cup orientation in total hip arthroplasty. Arai N; Nakamura S; Matsushita T; Suzuki S J Arthroplasty; 2010 Feb; 25(2):263-7. PubMed ID: 19442484 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of measuring acetabular cup position after total hip arthroplasty: comparison between a radiographic planning software and three-dimensional computed tomography. Bayraktar V; Weber M; von Kunow F; Zeman F; Craiovan B; Renkawitz T; Grifka J; Woerner M Int Orthop; 2017 Apr; 41(4):731-738. PubMed ID: 27277948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of cup orientation in hip resurfacing: a comparison of TraumaCad and computed tomography. Westacott DJ; McArthur J; King RJ; Foguet P J Orthop Surg Res; 2013 Apr; 8():8. PubMed ID: 23577620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cup version can be accurately measured on the false profile view radiograph. Lee JK; Sardana V; White C; Speirs A; Beaulé PE Hip Int; 2014; 24(4):347-54. PubMed ID: 24970323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of inter- and intra-observer reliability in the determination of radiographic version and inclination of the cup in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing. Reito A; Puolakka T; Paakkala A; Pajamäki J Int Orthop; 2012 Mar; 36(3):519-25. PubMed ID: 21837449 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of planar anteversion measurements using anteroposterior radiographs. Lee GC; Lee SH; Kang SW; Park HS; Jo S BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 Dec; 20(1):586. PubMed ID: 31805912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Safe Zone Range for Cup Anteversion Is Narrower Than for Inclination in THA. Murphy WS; Yun HH; Hayden B; Kowal JH; Murphy SB Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Feb; 476(2):325-335. PubMed ID: 29529664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of Acetabular Component Anteversion after Total Hip Arthroplasty: Comparison of Anteroposterior and Cross-Table Lateral Radiographs with Computed Tomography Scans. Goyal T; Paul S; Choudhury AK; Gupta T Clin Orthop Surg; 2021 Sep; 13(3):329-335. PubMed ID: 34484625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Hip Resurfacing Implant Orientation Analysis: A Comparison of a Computer-Added Design Technique and Computed Tomography. Weenders SG; van de Kimmenade RJ; Gratama JW; van der Zaag-Loonen HJ; Bullens PH; Breemans E J Arthroplasty; 2016 Feb; 31(2):501-5. PubMed ID: 26427940 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Digital Planning Software Fails to Reflect Stem Torsion on Plain Radiographs after Total Hip Arthroplasty. Worlicek M; Weber M; Zeman F; Wörner M; Schneider M; Grifka J; Renkawitz T; Craiovan B Rofo; 2016 Aug; 188(8):763-7. PubMed ID: 27355814 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Measurement of acetabular cup anteversion with the circle theorem. Kosiyatrakul A; Luenam S; Chotanaphuti T J Med Assoc Thai; 2009 Dec; 92 Suppl 6():S128-33. PubMed ID: 20120674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Validation of a statistical shape model-based 2D/3D reconstruction method for determination of cup orientation after THA. Zheng G; von Recum J; Nolte LP; Grützner PA; Steppacher SD; Franke J Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2012 Mar; 7(2):225-31. PubMed ID: 21792672 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ceramic-on-ceramic THA associated with fewer dislocations and less muscle degeneration by preserving muscle progenitors. Hernigou P; Roussignol X; Delambre J; Poignard A; Flouzat-Lachaniette CH Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 473(12):3762-9. PubMed ID: 26054482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reliability and Validity of Standing Lateral Radiograph Method for Measuring Acetabular Component Version: A Modified Cross-table Lateral Radiograph Method. Zhang W; Xu J; Li D; Sun H; Cai Z; Chen M; Ma R Orthop Surg; 2022 Aug; 14(8):1622-1629. PubMed ID: 35711111 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Revisiting the Anteroinferior Iliac Spine: Is the Subspine Pathologic? A Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation. Karns MR; Adeyemi TF; Stephens AR; Aoki SK; Beese ME; Salata MJ; Maak TG Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Jul; 476(7):1494-1502. PubMed ID: 29794857 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A new technique for radiographic measurement of acetabular cup orientation. Derbyshire B; Diggle PJ; Ingham CJ; Macnair R; Wimhurst J; Jones HW J Arthroplasty; 2014 Feb; 29(2):369-72. PubMed ID: 23896357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]