BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32443290)

  • 21. [Comparison of short-term effectiveness between minimally invasive surgery- and open-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for single-level lumbar degenerative disease].
    Yang J; Kong Q; Song Y; Liu H; Zeng J
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Mar; 27(3):262-7. PubMed ID: 23672121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Mini-invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion through Wiltse Approach to Treating Lumbar Spondylolytic Spondylolisthesis.
    Zhou C; Tian YH; Zheng YP; Liu XY; Wang HH
    Orthop Surg; 2016 Feb; 8(1):44-50. PubMed ID: 27028380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparative Analysis of Two Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Techniques: Open TLIF Versus Wiltse MIS TLIF.
    Ge DH; Stekas ND; Varlotta CG; Fischer CR; Petrizzo A; Protopsaltis TS; Passias PG; Errico TJ; Buckland AJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 May; 44(9):E555-E560. PubMed ID: 30325884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A protocol of a randomized controlled multicenter trial for surgical treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis: the Lumbar Interbody Fusion Trial (LIFT).
    de Kunder SL; Rijkers K; van Kuijk SM; Evers SM; de Bie RA; van Santbrink H
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2016 Oct; 17(1):417. PubMed ID: 27716168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) in lumbar spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    de Kunder SL; van Kuijk SMJ; Rijkers K; Caelers IJMH; van Hemert WLW; de Bie RA; van Santbrink H
    Spine J; 2017 Nov; 17(11):1712-1721. PubMed ID: 28647584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [COMPARISON OF EFFECTIVENESS BETWEEN PARA-MEDIAN INCISION MINIMALLY INVASIVE AND OPEN TRANSFORAMINAL LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION FOR SINGLE SEGMENTAL LUMBAR DEGENERATIVE DISEASE].
    Qi Q; Xiao Q; Deng L; Li C; Dong X
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Oct; 29(10):1253-8. PubMed ID: 26749734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of Outcomes of Anterior, Posterior, and Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery at a Single Lumbar Level with Degenerative Spinal Disease.
    Lee N; Kim KN; Yi S; Ha Y; Shin DA; Yoon DH; Kim KS
    World Neurosurg; 2017 May; 101():216-226. PubMed ID: 28189865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison Between Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Lan T; Hu SY; Zhang YT; Zheng YC; Zhang R; Shen Z; Yang XJ
    World Neurosurg; 2018 Apr; 112():86-93. PubMed ID: 29367001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Intraoperative and perioperative complications in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a review of 513 patients.
    Wong AP; Smith ZA; Nixon AT; Lawton CD; Dahdaleh NS; Wong RH; Auffinger B; Lam S; Song JK; Liu JC; Koski TR; Fessler RG
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 May; 22(5):487-95. PubMed ID: 25700243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Tranexamic acid reduce hidden blood loss in posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) surgery.
    Xu D; Chen X; Li Z; Ren Z; Zhuang Q; Li S
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Mar; 99(11):e19552. PubMed ID: 32176112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of bilateral decompression via a unilateral approach with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with stenosis.
    Cheng X; Zhang K; Sun X; Zhao C; Li H; Ni B; Zhao J
    Spine J; 2017 Aug; 17(8):1127-1133. PubMed ID: 28416439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Clinical outcomes of two minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) for lumbar degenerative diseases.
    Tian Y; Liu X
    Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2016 Oct; 26(7):745-51. PubMed ID: 26943871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Transforaminal interbody fusion versus anterior-posterior interbody fusion of the lumbar spine: a financial analysis.
    Whitecloud TS; Roesch WW; Ricciardi JE
    J Spinal Disord; 2001 Apr; 14(2):100-3. PubMed ID: 11285420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of serum markers for muscle damage, surgical blood loss, postoperative recovery, and surgical site pain after extreme lateral interbody fusion with percutaneous pedicle screws or traditional open posterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Ohba T; Ebata S; Haro H
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2017 Oct; 18(1):415. PubMed ID: 29037186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Effects of robot-assisted minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and traditional open surgery in the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis].
    Cui GY; Tian W; He D; Xing YG; Liu B; Yuan Q; Wang YQ; Sun YQ
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Jul; 55(7):543-548. PubMed ID: 28655085
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Clinical Outcomes of Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Three-Level Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.
    Fan G; Wu X; Yu S; Sun Q; Guan X; Zhang H; Gu X; He S
    Biomed Res Int; 2016; 2016():9540298. PubMed ID: 27747244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Utility of multilevel lateral interbody fusion of the thoracolumbar coronal curve apex in adult deformity surgery in combination with open posterior instrumentation and L5-S1 interbody fusion: a case-matched evaluation of 32 patients.
    Theologis AA; Mundis GM; Nguyen S; Okonkwo DO; Mummaneni PV; Smith JS; Shaffrey CI; Fessler R; Bess S; Schwab F; Diebo BG; Burton D; Hart R; Deviren V; Ames C;
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Feb; 26(2):208-219. PubMed ID: 27767682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of a novel hand-held retractor-assisted transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion by the wiltse approach and posterior TLIF: a one-year prospective controlled study.
    Shen X; Li FT; Quan Cheng Y; Zheng MH; Yao XQ; Wang HM; Ting Chen J; Jiang H
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2024 Feb; 25(1):142. PubMed ID: 38355528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Wiltse approach versus the conventional posterior midline approach for lumbar degenerative diseases: a metaanalysis].
    Ran B; Yan L; Cai L
    Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2015 Jan; 40(1):90-101. PubMed ID: 25652380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of posterior lumbar interbody fusion with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for treatment of recurrent lumbar disc herniation: A retrospective study.
    Li L; Liu Y; Zhang P; Lei T; Li J; Shen Y
    J Int Med Res; 2016 Dec; 44(6):1424-1429. PubMed ID: 27811052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.