177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32444206)
1. In vitro study on the influence of postpolymerization and aging on the Martens parameters of 3D-printed occlusal devices.
Reymus M; Stawarczyk B
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 May; 125(5):817-823. PubMed ID: 32444206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of Different Postpolymerization Strategies and Artificial Aging on Hardness of 3D-Printed Resin Materials: An In Vitro Study.
Reymus M; Stawarczyk B
Int J Prosthodont; 2020; 33(6):634-640. PubMed ID: 33284905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of various 3D printed and milled PAEK materials: Effect of printing direction and artificial aging on Martens parameters.
Prechtel A; Reymus M; Edelhoff D; Hickel R; Stawarczyk B
Dent Mater; 2020 Feb; 36(2):197-209. PubMed ID: 31785832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fracture load of 3D-printed fixed dental prostheses compared with milled and conventionally fabricated ones: the impact of resin material, build direction, post-curing, and artificial aging-an in vitro study.
Reymus M; Fabritius R; Keßler A; Hickel R; Edelhoff D; Stawarczyk B
Clin Oral Investig; 2020 Feb; 24(2):701-710. PubMed ID: 31127429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of printing orientation and artificial ageing on martens hardness and indentation modulus of 3D printed restorative resin materials.
Mudhaffer S; Althagafi R; Haider J; Satterthwaite J; Silikas N
Dent Mater; 2024 Jul; 40(7):1003-1014. PubMed ID: 38735775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparing the mechanical properties of pressed, milled, and 3D-printed resins for occlusal devices.
Berli C; Thieringer FM; Sharma N; Müller JA; Dedem P; Fischer J; Rohr N
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Dec; 124(6):780-786. PubMed ID: 31955837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of storage and toothbrush simulation on Martens hardness of CAD/CAM, hand-cast, thermoforming, and 3D-printed splint materials.
Rosentritt M; Hickl V; Rauch A; Schmidt M
Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Dec; 27(12):7859-7869. PubMed ID: 37957307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Temporary 3D printed fixed dental prosthesis materials: Impact of post printing cleaning methods on degree of conversion as well as surface and mechanical properties.
Mayer J; Reymus M; Wiedenmann F; Edelhoff D; Hickel R; Stawarczyk B
Int J Prosthodont; 2021; 34(6):784–795. PubMed ID: 33616559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of artificial aging on Martens hardness and indentation modulus of different dental CAD/CAM restorative materials.
Hampe R; Lümkemann N; Sener B; Stawarczyk B
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2018 Oct; 86():191-198. PubMed ID: 29986293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of storage medium and aging duration on mechanical properties of self-adhesive resin-based cements.
Liebermann A; Ilie N; Roos M; Stawarczyk B
J Appl Biomater Funct Mater; 2017 Jul; 15(3):e206-e214. PubMed ID: 28574094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mechanical and physical properties of splint materials for oral appliances produced by additive, subtractive and conventional manufacturing.
Maleki T; Meinen J; Coldea A; Reymus M; Edelhoff D; Stawarczyk B
Dent Mater; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38851965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Flexural strength, fracture toughness, three-body wear, and Martens parameters of pressable lithium-X-silicate ceramics.
Stawarczyk B; Dinse L; Eichberger M; Jungbauer R; Liebermann A
Dent Mater; 2020 Mar; 36(3):420-430. PubMed ID: 32007315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of polymerization and storage on the degree of conversion and mechanical properties of veneering resin composites.
Mayinger F; Reymus M; Liebermann A; Richter M; Kubryk P; Großekappenberg H; Stawarczyk B
Dent Mater J; 2021 Mar; 40(2):487-497. PubMed ID: 33342921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Time-dependent degree of conversion, Martens parameters, and flexural strength of different dual-polymerizing resin composite luting materials.
Kelch M; Stawarczyk B; Mayinger F
Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Jan; 26(1):1067-1076. PubMed ID: 34342762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of artificial aging by thermocycling on edge chipping resistance and Martens hardness of different dental CAD-CAM restorative materials.
Hampe R; Theelke B; Lümkemann N; Stawarczyk B
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Feb; 125(2):326-333. PubMed ID: 32115219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. 3D-printed material for temporary restorations: impact of print layer thickness and post-curing method on degree of conversion.
Reymus M; Lümkemann N; Stawarczyk B
Int J Comput Dent; 2019; 22(3):231-237. PubMed ID: 31463487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Different PEEK qualities irradiated with light of different wavelengths: Impact on Martens hardness.
Lümkemann N; Eichberger M; Stawarczyk B
Dent Mater; 2017 Sep; 33(9):968-975. PubMed ID: 28662860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mechanical and optical properties of indirect veneering resin composites after different aging regimes.
Stawarczyk B; Brauneis M; Langwieder B; Spintzyk S; Eichberger M; Liebermann A
Dent Mater J; 2021 Mar; 40(2):279-287. PubMed ID: 33208573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Can postpolymerization for 3D-printed interim restorations be improved?
Rizzante FAP; Magão P; Moura G; Teich S; Mendonça G; Furuse AY
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Nov; 128(5):1102.e1-1102.e5. PubMed ID: 36460427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. 3D printing of dental restorations: Mechanical properties of thermoplastic polymer materials.
Schönhoff LM; Mayinger F; Eichberger M; Reznikova E; Stawarczyk B
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2021 Jul; 119():104544. PubMed ID: 33901966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
