169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32444978)
1. Comparing FE human body model rib geometry to population data.
Holcombe SA; Agnew AM; Derstine B; Wang SC
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2020 Dec; 19(6):2227-2239. PubMed ID: 32444978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cross-sectional properties of rib geometry from an adult population.
Holcombe S; Huang Y
Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2023; 11():1158242. PubMed ID: 37284235
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Regional maps of rib cortical bone thickness and cross-sectional geometry.
Holcombe SA; Kang YS; Derstine BA; Wang SC; Agnew AM
J Anat; 2019 Nov; 235(5):883-891. PubMed ID: 31225915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Population trends in human rib cross-sectional shapes.
Holcombe SA; Huang Y; Derstine BA
J Anat; 2024 May; 244(5):792-802. PubMed ID: 38200705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Detailed subject-specific FE rib modeling for fracture prediction.
Iraeus J; Lundin L; Storm S; Agnew A; Kang YS; Kemper A; Albert D; Holcombe S; Pipkorn B
Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup2):S88-S95. PubMed ID: 31589083
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Development and preliminary validation of computationally efficient and detailed 50th percentile female human body models.
Robinson A; von Kleeck BW; Gayzik FS
Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Sep; 190():107182. PubMed ID: 37390749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Development, Evaluation, and Sensitivity Analysis of Parametric Finite Element Whole-Body Human Models in Side Impacts.
Hwang E; Hu J; Chen C; Klein KF; Miller CS; Reed MP; Rupp JD; Hallman JJ
Stapp Car Crash J; 2016 Nov; 60():473-508. PubMed ID: 27871104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Age targeted human body models indicate increased thoracic injury risk with aging.
von Kleeck BW; Hostetler Z; Fleischmann K; Weaver AA; Gayzik FS
Traffic Inj Prev; 2022; 23(sup1):S74-S79. PubMed ID: 35862927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Factors affecting the numerical response and fracture location of the GHBMC M50 rib in dynamic anterior-posterior loading.
Rampersadh C; Agnew AM; Malcolm S; Gierczycka D; Iraeus J; Cronin D
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2022 Dec; 136():105527. PubMed ID: 36306670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of finite element human body models for use in a standardized protocol for pedestrian safety assessment.
Decker W; Koya B; Pak W; Untaroiu CD; Gayzik FS
Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup2):S32-S36. PubMed ID: 31356121
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The Contribution of Pre-impact Posture on Restrained Occupant Finite Element Model Response in Frontal Impact.
Poulard D; Subit D; Nie B; Donlon JP; Kent RW
Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 2():S87-95. PubMed ID: 26436247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Development of a computationally efficient full human body finite element model.
Schwartz D; Guleyupoglu B; Koya B; Stitzel JD; Gayzik FS
Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 1():S49-56. PubMed ID: 26027975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validation of Shoulder Response of Human Body Finite-Element Model (GHBMC) Under Whole Body Lateral Impact Condition.
Park G; Kim T; Panzer MB; Crandall JR
Ann Biomed Eng; 2016 Aug; 44(8):2558-2576. PubMed ID: 26753830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validated thoracic vertebrae and costovertebral joints increase biofidelity of a human body model in hub impacts.
Aira J; Guleyupoglu B; Jones D; Koya B; Davis M; Gayzik FS
Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup2):S1-S6. PubMed ID: 31364878
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Subject-specific rib finite element models with material data derived from coupon tests under bending loading.
Yates KM; Agnew AM; Albert DL; Kemper AR; Untaroiu CD
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2021 Apr; 116():104358. PubMed ID: 33610029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Stress profile of infant rib in the setting of child abuse: A finite element parametric study.
Tsai A; Coats B; Kleinman PK
J Biomech; 2012 Jul; 45(11):1861-8. PubMed ID: 22727522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Age- and sex-specific thorax finite element model development and simulation.
Schoell SL; Weaver AA; Vavalle NA; Stitzel JD
Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 1():S57-65. PubMed ID: 26027976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A Cortical Thickness Mapping Method for the Coxal Bone Using Morphing.
Giudice JS; Poulard D; Nie B; Wu T; Panzer MB
Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2018; 6():149. PubMed ID: 30406094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sources of Variability in Structural Bending Response of Pediatric and Adult Human Ribs in Dynamic Frontal Impacts.
Agnew AM; Murach MM; Dominguez VM; Sreedhar A; Misicka E; Harden A; Bolte JH; Kang YS; Stammen J; Moorhouse K
Stapp Car Crash J; 2018 Nov; 62():119-192. PubMed ID: 30608995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influences of human thorax variability on population rib fracture risk prediction using human body models.
Larsson KJ; Iraeus J; Holcombe S; Pipkorn B
Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2023; 11():1154272. PubMed ID: 37034266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
