These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32445202)

  • 1. Spatial variation in diet-microbe associations across populations of a generalist North American carnivore.
    Colborn AS; Kuntze CC; Gadsden GI; Harris NC
    J Anim Ecol; 2020 Aug; 89(8):1952-1960. PubMed ID: 32445202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A continental scale trophic cascade from wolves through coyotes to foxes.
    Newsome TM; Ripple WJ
    J Anim Ecol; 2015 Jan; 84(1):49-59. PubMed ID: 24930631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Marginal support for a trophic cascade among sympatric canids in peripheral wolf range.
    Fowler NL; Kautz TM; Petroelje TR; Wilton CM; Kellner KF; O'Brien DJ; Parsons B; Beyer DE; Belant JL
    Ecology; 2021 Nov; 102(11):e03494. PubMed ID: 34309013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Interference competition between wolves and coyotes during variable prey abundance.
    Petroelje TR; Kautz TM; Beyer DE; Belant JL
    Ecol Evol; 2021 Feb; 11(3):1413-1431. PubMed ID: 33598141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ungulate predation and ecological roles of wolves and coyotes in eastern North America.
    Benson JF; Loveless KM; Rutledge LY; Patterson BR
    Ecol Appl; 2017 Apr; 27(3):718-733. PubMed ID: 28064464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Variable effects of wolves on niche breadth and density of intraguild competitors.
    Fowler NL; Petroelje TR; Kautz TM; Svoboda NJ; Duquette JF; Kellner KF; Beyer DE; Belant JL
    Ecol Evol; 2022 Feb; 12(2):e8542. PubMed ID: 35154647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Indirect effects and traditional trophic cascades: a test involving wolves, coyotes, and pronghorn.
    Berger KM; Gese EM; Berger J
    Ecology; 2008 Mar; 89(3):818-28. PubMed ID: 18459344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Does interference competition with wolves limit the distribution and abundance of coyotes?
    Berger KM; Gese EM
    J Anim Ecol; 2007 Nov; 76(6):1075-85. PubMed ID: 17922704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Inter-specific territoriality in a Canis hybrid zone: spatial segregation between wolves, coyotes, and hybrids.
    Benson JF; Patterson BR
    Oecologia; 2013 Dec; 173(4):1539-50. PubMed ID: 23864253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The natural history and ecology of melanism in red wolf and coyote populations of the southeastern United States - evidence for Gloger's rule.
    Hinton JW; West KM; Sullivan DJ; Frair JL; Chamberlain MJ
    BMC Zool; 2022 Jun; 7(1):33. PubMed ID: 37170305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Analysis of Canis mitochondrial DNA demonstrates high concordance between the control region and ATPase genes.
    Rutledge LY; Patterson BR; White BN
    BMC Evol Biol; 2010 Jul; 10():215. PubMed ID: 20637067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sympatric wolf and coyote populations of the western Great Lakes region are reproductively isolated.
    Wheeldon TJ; Patterson BR; White BN
    Mol Ecol; 2010 Oct; 19(20):4428-40. PubMed ID: 20854277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Land cover and space use influence coyote carnivory: evidence from stable-isotope analysis.
    Webster SC; Hinton JW; Chamberlain MJ; Murphy JJ; Beasley JC
    PeerJ; 2024; 12():e17457. PubMed ID: 38854793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of urbanization on resource use and individual specialization in coyotes (Canis latrans) in southern California.
    Larson RN; Brown JL; Karels T; Riley SPD
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(2):e0228881. PubMed ID: 32023321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Recolonizing wolves and mesopredator suppression of coyotes: impacts on pronghorn population dynamics.
    Berger KM; Conner MM
    Ecol Appl; 2008 Apr; 18(3):599-612. PubMed ID: 18488620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Panmixia and Limited Interspecific Introgression in Coyotes (Canis latrans) from West Virginia and Virginia, USA.
    Bohling JH; Mastro LL; Adams JR; Gese EM; Owen SF; Waits LP
    J Hered; 2017 Sep; 108(6):608-617. PubMed ID: 28821188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Isotopic investigation of niche partitioning among native carnivores and the non-native coyote (Canis latrans).
    Warsen SA; Frair JL; Teece MA
    Isotopes Environ Health Stud; 2014; 50(3):414-24. PubMed ID: 24666214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An altered microbiome in urban coyotes mediates relationships between anthropogenic diet and poor health.
    Sugden S; Sanderson D; Ford K; Stein LY; St Clair CC
    Sci Rep; 2020 Dec; 10(1):22207. PubMed ID: 33335116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Genetic differentiation of eastern wolves in Algonquin Park despite bridging gene flow between coyotes and grey wolves.
    Rutledge LY; Garroway CJ; Loveless KM; Patterson BR
    Heredity (Edinb); 2010 Dec; 105(6):520-31. PubMed ID: 20160760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Demographic history influences spatial patterns of genetic diversityin recently expanded coyote (Canis latrans) populations.
    Heppenheimer E; Cosio DS; Brzeski KE; Caudill D; Van Why K; Chamberlain MJ; Hinton JW; vonHoldt B
    Heredity (Edinb); 2018 Mar; 120(3):183-195. PubMed ID: 29269931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.