176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32445245)
1. Moral Values Reveal the Causality Implicit in Verb Meaning.
Niemi L; Hartshorne J; Gerstenberg T; Stanley M; Young L
Cogn Sci; 2020 Jun; 44(6):e12838. PubMed ID: 32445245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Kill or die: Moral judgment alters linguistic coding of causality.
De Freitas J; DeScioli P; Nemirow J; Massenkoff M; Pinker S
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Aug; 43(8):1173-1182. PubMed ID: 28150958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Who attributes what to whom? Moral values and relational context shape causal attribution to the person or the situation.
Niemi L; Doris JM; Graham J
Cognition; 2023 Mar; 232():105332. PubMed ID: 36508991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Individual differences in reliance on intuition predict harsher moral judgments.
Ward SJ; King LA
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2018 May; 114(5):825-849. PubMed ID: 28627916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations.
Graham J; Haidt J; Nosek BA
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2009 May; 96(5):1029-46. PubMed ID: 19379034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. When and Why We See Victims as Responsible: The Impact of Ideology on Attitudes Toward Victims.
Niemi L; Young L
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2016 Sep; 42(9):1227-42. PubMed ID: 27340155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Causal Conceptions in Social Explanation and Moral Evaluation: A Historical Tour.
Alicke MD; Mandel DR; Hilton DJ; Gerstenberg T; Lagnado DA
Perspect Psychol Sci; 2015 Nov; 10(6):790-812. PubMed ID: 26581736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. How causal structure, causal strength, and foreseeability affect moral judgments.
Engelmann N; Waldmann MR
Cognition; 2022 Sep; 226():105167. PubMed ID: 35660345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mechanism of the better-than-average effect in moral issues: Asymmetrical causal attribution across moral (vs. immoral) contexts.
Han K; Kim MY
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2022 Jun; 226():103575. PubMed ID: 35367637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mapping the moral domain.
Graham J; Nosek BA; Haidt J; Iyer R; Koleva S; Ditto PH
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2011 Aug; 101(2):366-85. PubMed ID: 21244182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Harmful situations, impure people: an attribution asymmetry across moral domains.
Chakroff A; Young L
Cognition; 2015 Mar; 136():30-7. PubMed ID: 25490126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A functional imaging investigation of moral deliberation and moral intuition.
Harenski CL; Antonenko O; Shane MS; Kiehl KA
Neuroimage; 2010 Feb; 49(3):2707-16. PubMed ID: 19878727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Implicit moral evaluations: A multinomial modeling approach.
Cameron CD; Payne BK; Sinnott-Armstrong W; Scheffer JA; Inzlicht M
Cognition; 2017 Jan; 158():224-241. PubMed ID: 27865113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Importance of Context in Moral Judgments.
Schein C
Perspect Psychol Sci; 2020 Mar; 15(2):207-215. PubMed ID: 32129715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Unfounded dumbfounding: How harm and purity undermine evidence for moral dumbfounding.
Guglielmo S
Cognition; 2018 Jan; 170():334-337. PubMed ID: 28803616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Moral kinematics: the role of physical factors in moral judgments.
Iliev RI; Sachdeva S; Medin DL
Mem Cognit; 2012 Nov; 40(8):1387-401. PubMed ID: 22618711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An interaction effect of norm violations on causal judgment.
Gill M; Kominsky JF; Icard TF; Knobe J
Cognition; 2022 Nov; 228():105183. PubMed ID: 35830782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Morality constrains the default representation of what is possible.
Phillips J; Cushman F
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2017 May; 114(18):4649-4654. PubMed ID: 28420792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Principled moral sentiment and the flexibility of moral judgment and decision making.
Bartels DM
Cognition; 2008 Aug; 108(2):381-417. PubMed ID: 18486121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bullying and defending behavior: The role of explicit and implicit moral cognition.
Pozzoli T; Gini G; Thornberg R
J Sch Psychol; 2016 Dec; 59():67-81. PubMed ID: 27923442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
