215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32446165)
1. The petrous bone: Ideal substrate in legal medicine?
Gonzalez A; Cannet C; Zvénigorosky V; Geraut A; Koch G; Delabarde T; Ludes B; Raul JS; Keyser C
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Jul; 47():102305. PubMed ID: 32446165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Neither femur nor tooth: Petrous bone for identifying archaeological bone samples via forensic approach.
Pilli E; Vai S; Caruso MG; D'Errico G; Berti A; Caramelli D
Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Feb; 283():144-149. PubMed ID: 29301114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. As solid as a rock-comparison of CE- and MPS-based analyses of the petrosal bone as a source of DNA for forensic identification of challenging cranial bones.
Kulstein G; Hadrys T; Wiegand P
Int J Legal Med; 2018 Jan; 132(1):13-24. PubMed ID: 28755253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of nuclear DNA yield and STR typing success in Second World War petrous bones and metacarpals III.
Zupanič Pajnič I; Inkret J; Zupanc T; Podovšovnik E
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 Nov; 55():102578. PubMed ID: 34425360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison between petrous bone and tooth, femur and tibia DNA analysis from degraded skeletal remains.
Haarkötter C; Vinueza-Espinosa DC; Gálvez X; Saiz M; Medina-Lozano MI; Lorente JA; Álvarez JC
Electrophoresis; 2023 Oct; 44(19-20):1559-1568. PubMed ID: 37469183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prediction of autosomal STR typing success in ancient and Second World War bone samples.
Zupanič Pajnič I; Zupanc T; Balažic J; Geršak ŽM; Stojković O; Skadrić I; Črešnar M
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Mar; 27():17-26. PubMed ID: 27907810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of a New DNA Extraction Method on Challenging Bone Samples Recovered from a WWII Mass Grave.
Di Stefano B; Zupanič Pajnič I; Concato M; Bertoglio B; Calvano MG; Sorçaburu Ciglieri S; Bosetti A; Grignani P; Addoum Y; Vetrini R; Introna F; Bonin S; Previderè C; Fattorini P
Genes (Basel); 2024 May; 15(6):. PubMed ID: 38927608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reconstructing full and partial STR profiles from severely burned human remains using comparative ancient and forensic DNA extraction techniques.
Emery MV; Bolhofner K; Winingear S; Oldt R; Montes M; Kanthaswamy S; Buikstra JE; Fulginiti LC; Stone AC
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 May; 46():102272. PubMed ID: 32172220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The mysteries of DNA preservation in bone: A comparative study of petrous bones and metacarpal epiphyses using ATR-FTIR spectroscopy.
Leskovar T; Jerman I; Zupanič Pajnič I
Forensic Sci Int; 2024 Jul; 360():112076. PubMed ID: 38821024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of DNA preservation between adult and non-adult ancient skeletons.
Šuligoj A; Mesesnel S; Leskovar T; Podovšovnik E; Zupanič Pajnič I
Int J Legal Med; 2022 Nov; 136(6):1521-1539. PubMed ID: 36048257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Identifying victims of the largest Second World War family massacre in Slovenia.
Zupanič Pajnič I; Obal M; Zupanc T
Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Jan; 306():110056. PubMed ID: 31765883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Optimal Ancient DNA Yields from the Inner Ear Part of the Human Petrous Bone.
Pinhasi R; Fernandes D; Sirak K; Novak M; Connell S; Alpaslan-Roodenberg S; Gerritsen F; Moiseyev V; Gromov A; Raczky P; Anders A; Pietrusewsky M; Rollefson G; Jovanovic M; Trinhhoang H; Bar-Oz G; Oxenham M; Matsumura H; Hofreiter M
PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0129102. PubMed ID: 26086078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of DNA yield and STR success rates from different tissues in embalmed bodies.
Wheeler A; Czado N; Gangitano D; Turnbough M; Hughes-Stamm S
Int J Legal Med; 2017 Jan; 131(1):61-66. PubMed ID: 27338932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Searching for the mother missed since the Second World War.
Zupanič Pajnič I; Petaros A; Balažic J; Geršak K
J Forensic Leg Med; 2016 Nov; 44():138-142. PubMed ID: 27810583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Forensic genetic analysis of bone remain samples.
Siriboonpiputtana T; Rinthachai T; Shotivaranon J; Peonim V; Rerkamnuaychoke B
Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Mar; 284():167-175. PubMed ID: 29408726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Improved Y-STR typing for disaster victim identification, missing persons investigations, and historical human skeletal remains.
Ambers A; Votrubova J; Vanek D; Sajantila A; Budowle B
Int J Legal Med; 2018 Nov; 132(6):1545-1553. PubMed ID: 29476237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Massively parallel sequencing of 17 commonly used forensic autosomal STRs and amelogenin with small amplicons.
Kim EH; Lee HY; Yang IS; Jung SE; Yang WI; Shin KJ
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 May; 22():1-7. PubMed ID: 26799314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An optimal skeletal element for DNA testing: Evaluation of DNA quantity and quality from various bone types in routine forensic practice.
Otagiri T; Sato N; Shiozaki T; Harayama Y; Matsumoto M; Kobayashi K; Asamura H
Leg Med (Tokyo); 2024 May; 68():102415. PubMed ID: 38280273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. High DNA yield from metatarsal and metacarpal bones from Slovenian Second World War skeletal remains.
Zupanc T; Podovšovnik E; Obal M; Zupanič Pajnič I
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 Mar; 51():102426. PubMed ID: 33248348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Is MPS always the answer? Use of two PCR-based methods for Y-chromosomal haplotyping in highly and moderately degraded bone material.
Szargut M; Diepenbroek M; Zielińska G; Cytacka S; Arciszewska J; Jałowińska K; Piątek J; Ossowski A
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Sep; 42():181-189. PubMed ID: 31374457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
