These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

450 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32447230)

  • 21. In-field collection and preservation of decomposing human tissues to facilitate rapid purification and STR typing.
    Holmes AS; Roman MG; Hughes-Stamm S
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Sep; 36():124-129. PubMed ID: 29990824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Powerplex® ES versus Powerplex® S5--casework testing of the new screening kit.
    Poetsch M; Kamphausen T; Bajanowski T; Schwark T; von Wurmb-Schwark N
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2011 Jan; 5(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 20457034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The Usefulness of qPCR Data for Sample Pre-Assessment and Interpretation of Genetic Typing Results.
    Onofri M; Severini S; Tommolini F; Lancia M; Gambelunghe C; Carlini L; Carnevali E
    Genes (Basel); 2024 Jun; 15(6):. PubMed ID: 38927680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of Quantifiler(®) Trio and InnoQuant™ human DNA quantification kits for detection of DNA degradation in developed and aged fingerprints.
    Goecker ZC; Swiontek SE; Lakhtakia A; Roy R
    Forensic Sci Int; 2016 Jun; 263():132-138. PubMed ID: 27107968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. An evaluation of the performance of five extraction methods: Chelex® 100, QIAamp® DNA Blood Mini Kit, QIAamp® DNA Investigator Kit, QIAsymphony® DNA Investigator® Kit and DNA IQ™.
    Ip SC; Lin SW; Lai KM
    Sci Justice; 2015 May; 55(3):200-8. PubMed ID: 25934373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Analysis of DNA from post-blast pipe bomb fragments for identification and determination of ancestry.
    Tasker E; LaRue B; Beherec C; Gangitano D; Hughes-Stamm S
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 May; 28():195-202. PubMed ID: 28292727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A comparison of four methods for PCR inhibitor removal.
    Hu Q; Liu Y; Yi S; Huang D
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 May; 16():94-97. PubMed ID: 25553520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. An optimized procedure for obtaining DNA from fired and unfired ammunition.
    Montpetit S; O'Donnell P
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 Jul; 17():70-74. PubMed ID: 25828369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Improved amplification results following episodes of failure to amplify at the Amelogenin Locus using PowerPlex
    Berlyne S; Oz C; Einot N; Avraham S; Ram T; Goldberg MD; Gafny R
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Jul; 29():257-260. PubMed ID: 28511096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A Comparison Among Three Multiplex Y-STR Profiling Kits for Sexual Assault Cases.
    Ferreira-Silva B; Fonseca-Cardoso M; Porto MJ; Magalhães T; Cainé L
    J Forensic Sci; 2018 Nov; 63(6):1836-1840. PubMed ID: 29464703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of DNA yield and STR success rates from different tissues in embalmed bodies.
    Wheeler A; Czado N; Gangitano D; Turnbough M; Hughes-Stamm S
    Int J Legal Med; 2017 Jan; 131(1):61-66. PubMed ID: 27338932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A comparison of six adhesive tapes as tape lifts for efficient trace DNA recovery without the transfer of PCR inhibitors.
    Hymus CM; Baxter FO; Ta H; Tran T; de Sousa C; Mountford NS; Tay JW
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2024 Mar; 67():102330. PubMed ID: 37802731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. An Optimized DNA Analysis Workflow for the Sampling, Extraction, and Concentration of DNA obtained from Archived Latent Fingerprints.
    Solomon AD; Hytinen ME; McClain AM; Miller MT; Dawson Cruz T
    J Forensic Sci; 2018 Jan; 63(1):47-57. PubMed ID: 28382646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Establishing an integrated pipeline for automatic and efficient detection of trace DNA encountered in forensic applications.
    Chen C; Lin Y; Yu H; Xue Y; Xu Q; Jiang L; Zhu R; Chen A; Yang Y; Xia R; Zhang X; Yang Q; Tao R; Zhu B; Li C; Zhang S
    Sci Justice; 2022 Jan; 62(1):50-59. PubMed ID: 35033328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Massively parallel sequencing of 17 commonly used forensic autosomal STRs and amelogenin with small amplicons.
    Kim EH; Lee HY; Yang IS; Jung SE; Yang WI; Shin KJ
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 May; 22():1-7. PubMed ID: 26799314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Analysis of rapid HIT application to touch DNA samples.
    Martin B; Kaesler T; Linacre A
    J Forensic Sci; 2022 May; 67(3):1233-1240. PubMed ID: 34978082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A novel, 4-h DNA extraction method for STR typing of casework bone samples.
    Hasap L; Chotigeat W; Pradutkanchana J; Vongvatcharanon U; Kitpipit T; Thanakiatkrai P
    Int J Legal Med; 2020 Mar; 134(2):461-471. PubMed ID: 31897668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Analysis of fingerprint samples, testing various conditions, for forensic DNA identification.
    Ostojic L; Wurmbach E
    Sci Justice; 2017 Jan; 57(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 28063583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Development of a normalized extraction to further aid in fast, high-throughput processing of forensic DNA reference samples.
    Connon CC; LeFebvre AK; Benjamin RC
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Nov; 25():112-124. PubMed ID: 27566134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Collecting touch DNA from glass surfaces using different sampling solutions and volumes: Immediate and storage effects on genetic STR analysis.
    Schulte J; Rittiner N; Seiberle I; Kron S; Schulz I
    J Forensic Sci; 2023 Jul; 68(4):1133-1147. PubMed ID: 37282776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.