228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32447627)
1. Computed tomography screening for lung cancer.
Sudarshan M; Murthy S
Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2020 Jul; 68(7):660-664. PubMed ID: 32447627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The rationale for, and design of, a lung cancer screening program.
Mazzone P
Cleve Clin J Med; 2012 May; 79(5):337-45. PubMed ID: 22550076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cost-effectiveness of implementing computed tomography screening for lung cancer in Taiwan.
Yang SC; Lai WW; Lin CC; Su WC; Ku LJ; Hwang JS; Wang JD
Lung Cancer; 2017 Jun; 108():183-191. PubMed ID: 28625633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Estimating the Cost-Effectiveness of Lung Cancer Screening with Low-Dose Computed Tomography for High-Risk Smokers in Australia.
Wade S; Weber M; Caruana M; Kang YJ; Marshall H; Manser R; Vinod S; Rankin N; Fong K; Canfell K
J Thorac Oncol; 2018 Aug; 13(8):1094-1105. PubMed ID: 29689434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. What is the Optimum Screening Strategy for the Early Detection of Lung Cancer.
Baldwin DR; Callister ME
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2016 Nov; 28(11):672-681. PubMed ID: 27544425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography: Experiences from a tertiary hospital in Taiwan.
Chen CY; Chen CH; Shen TC; Cheng WC; Hsu CN; Liao CH; Chen CY; Hsia TC; Liao WC; Tu CY; Shih CM; Hsu WH
J Formos Med Assoc; 2016 Mar; 115(3):163-70. PubMed ID: 26714425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Lung cancer screening with thoracic X‑ray and CT : Current situation].
von Stackelberg O; Kauczor HU
Radiologe; 2016 Sep; 56(9):793-7. PubMed ID: 27411917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Lung cancer screening: the radiologist's perspective.
Prokop M
Semin Respir Crit Care Med; 2014 Feb; 35(1):91-8. PubMed ID: 24481763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost-effectiveness of CT screening in the National Lung Screening Trial.
Black WC; Gareen IF; Soneji SS; Sicks JD; Keeler EB; Aberle DR; Naeim A; Church TR; Silvestri GA; Gorelick J; Gatsonis C;
N Engl J Med; 2014 Nov; 371(19):1793-802. PubMed ID: 25372087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative analysis of 5 lung cancer natural history and screening models that reproduce outcomes of the NLST and PLCO trials.
Meza R; ten Haaf K; Kong CY; Erdogan A; Black WC; Tammemagi MC; Choi SE; Jeon J; Han SS; Munshi V; van Rosmalen J; Pinsky P; McMahon PM; de Koning HJ; Feuer EJ; Hazelton WD; Plevritis SK
Cancer; 2014 Jun; 120(11):1713-24. PubMed ID: 24577803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Low-dose computed tomography lung cancer screening.
Furlow B
Radiol Technol; 2014; 85(3):297CT-314CT; quiz 315CT-318CT. PubMed ID: 24395909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Screening for lung cancer. Too many uncertainties, even for smokers.
Prescrire Int; 2014 Jan; 23(145):19-23. PubMed ID: 24516909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Lung cancer screening among the smoker population].
Coureau G; Delva F
Bull Cancer; 2019; 106(7-8):693-702. PubMed ID: 30777302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The evidence for low-dose CT screening of lung cancer.
Ruchalski K; Gutierrez A; Genshaft S; Abtin F; Suh R
Clin Imaging; 2016; 40(2):288-95. PubMed ID: 26362352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Reduction in lung cancer mortality by screening programs in smokers--low dose spiral CT is superior to conventional chest X-ray].
Weiß M
Rofo; 2014 Jan; 186(1):14. PubMed ID: 24511605
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. 'Reduced' HUNT model outperforms NLST and NELSON study criteria in predicting lung cancer in the Danish screening trial.
Røe OD; Markaki M; Tsamardinos I; Lagani V; Nguyen OTD; Pedersen JH; Saghir Z; Ashraf HG
BMJ Open Respir Res; 2019; 6(1):e000512. PubMed ID: 31803478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Lung cancer screening: advantages, controversies, and applications.
Nanavaty P; Alvarez MS; Alberts WM
Cancer Control; 2014 Jan; 21(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 24357736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Occurrence and lung cancer probability of new solid nodules at incidence screening with low-dose CT: analysis of data from the randomised, controlled NELSON trial.
Walter JE; Heuvelmans MA; de Jong PA; Vliegenthart R; van Ooijen PMA; Peters RB; Ten Haaf K; Yousaf-Khan U; van der Aalst CM; de Bock GH; Mali W; Groen HJM; de Koning HJ; Oudkerk M
Lancet Oncol; 2016 Jul; 17(7):907-916. PubMed ID: 27283862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The National Lung Screening Trial Premise of Null and Chest Radiography Equivalence Is Open to Question.
Reich JM; Kim JS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Aug; 205(2):278-9. PubMed ID: 26204275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Lung Cancer Screening in the United States: A Comparative Modeling Study.
Criss SD; Cao P; Bastani M; Ten Haaf K; Chen Y; Sheehan DF; Blom EF; Toumazis I; Jeon J; de Koning HJ; Plevritis SK; Meza R; Kong CY
Ann Intern Med; 2019 Dec; 171(11):796-804. PubMed ID: 31683314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]