208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32448806)
61. Management of Early Cervical Stromal Invasion FIGO Stage 1A1 When Margins Are Involved With Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia.
Nicholson RC; Twigg J; Roberts A; Angelopoulos G; Cruickshank D
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2018 Apr; 22(2):129-131. PubMed ID: 29474238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. The effectiveness of cold-knife conization (CKC) for post-menopausal women with cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion: a retrospective study.
Li X; Liu M; Ji Y; Qu P
BMC Surg; 2021 May; 21(1):241. PubMed ID: 33975589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. [Reasonable surgical approach for grade III cervical intraepithelial neoplasia].
Wu X; Cui Y; Gong Y; Xu H; Jiang D; Meng S
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2012 Aug; 37(8):824-8. PubMed ID: 22954923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Factors affecting residual lesion in women with cervical adenocarcinoma in situ after cone excisional biopsy.
Srisomboon J; Kietpeerakool C; Suprasert P; Siriaunkgul S; Khunamornpong S; Prompittayarat W
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2007; 8(2):225-8. PubMed ID: 17696736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Recurrence of dysplasia after loop electrosurgical excision procedures with long-term follow-up.
Gonzalez DI; Zahn CM; Retzloff MG; Moore WF; Kost ER; Snyder RR
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Feb; 184(3):315-21. PubMed ID: 11228480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Outcome after conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade III: relation with surgical margins, extension to the crypts and mitoses.
Maluf PJ; Adad SJ; Murta EF
Tumori; 2004; 90(5):473-7. PubMed ID: 15656332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Risk of persistent or recurrent neoplasia in conservatively treated women with cervical adenocarcinoma in situ with negative histological margins.
Munro A; Codde J; Spilsbury K; Stewart CJ; Steel N; Leung Y; Tan J; Salfinger SG; Mohan GR; Semmens JB; Cohen PA
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2017 Apr; 96(4):432-437. PubMed ID: 28181670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Conservative management of adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix.
Shin CH; Schorge JO; Lee KR; Sheets EE
Gynecol Oncol; 2000 Oct; 79(1):6-10. PubMed ID: 11006022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix: management and outcome.
Azodi M; Chambers SK; Rutherford TJ; Kohorn EI; Schwartz PE; Chambers JT
Gynecol Oncol; 1999 Jun; 73(3):348-53. PubMed ID: 10366458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Prediction of residual neoplasia based on histopathology and margin status of conization specimens.
Chang DY; Cheng WF; Torng PL; Chen RJ; Huang SC
Gynecol Oncol; 1996 Oct; 63(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 8898168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Significance of margin and extent of dysplasia in loop electrosurgery excision procedure biopsies performed for high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion in predicting persistent disease.
Tyler LN; Andrews N; Parrish RS; Hazlett LJ; Korourian S
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2007 Apr; 131(4):622-4. PubMed ID: 17425396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. A prospective evaluation of "see and treat" in women with HSIL Pap smear results: is this an appropriate strategy?
Numnum TM; Kirby TO; Leath CA; Huh WK; Alvarez RD; Straughn JM
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2005 Jan; 9(1):2-6. PubMed ID: 15870514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Management and follow-up of patients with adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix.
Poynor EA; Barakat RR; Hoskins WJ
Gynecol Oncol; 1995 May; 57(2):158-64. PubMed ID: 7729727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (CIN 2 and 3) excised with negative margins by loop electrosurgical excision procedure: the significance of CIN 1 at the margins of excision.
Cardoza-Favarato G; Fadare O
Hum Pathol; 2007 May; 38(5):781-6. PubMed ID: 17316761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Predictors of recurrent/residual disease after loop electrosurgical excisional procedure.
Chikazawa K; Netsu S; Motomatsu S; Konno R
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2016 Apr; 42(4):457-63. PubMed ID: 26786387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Fertility-sparing surgery in 101 women with adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix.
Bull-Phelps SL; Garner EI; Walsh CS; Gehrig PA; Miller DS; Schorge JO
Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Nov; 107(2):316-9. PubMed ID: 17689593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. [Diagnosis and treatment of grade III cervical intraepithelial neoplasia by cervical conization in 98 patients].
Chen W; Guan T
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2010 Jul; 30(7):1642-4, 1647. PubMed ID: 20650790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Factors associated with positive margins in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 and postconization management.
Chen Y; Lu H; Wan X; Lv W; Xie X
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2009 Nov; 107(2):107-10. PubMed ID: 19628208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Human papilloma virus testing in patient follow-up post cone biopsy due to high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Almog B; Gamzu R; Kuperminc MJ; Levin I; Fainaru O; Niv J; Bar-Am A
Gynecol Oncol; 2003 Mar; 88(3):345-50. PubMed ID: 12648585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Necessity for subsequent surgery in women of child-bearing age with positive margins after conization.
Wang X; Xu J; Gao Y; Qu P
BMC Womens Health; 2021 May; 21(1):191. PubMed ID: 33962590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
