586 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32450226)
1. National Analysis of Perioperative Morbidity of Vaginal Versus Laparoscopic Hysterectomy at the Time of Uterosacral Ligament Suspension.
Chapman GC; Slopnick EA; Roberts K; Sheyn D; Wherley S; Mahajan ST; Pollard RR
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Feb; 28(2):275-281. PubMed ID: 32450226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Vaginal versus robotic hysterectomy and concomitant pelvic support surgery: a comparison of postoperative vaginal length and sexual function.
De La Cruz JF; Myers EM; Geller EJ
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(6):1010-4. PubMed ID: 24780383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Laparoscopic Uterosacral Ligament Hysteropexy vs Total Vaginal Hysterectomy with Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for Anterior and Apical Prolapse: Surgical Outcome and Patient Satisfaction.
Haj-Yahya R; Chill HH; Levin G; Reuveni-Salzman A; Shveiky D
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020 Jan; 27(1):88-93. PubMed ID: 30802607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Vesicoureteral Injury during Benign Hysterectomy: Minimally Invasive Laparoscopic Surgery versus Laparotomy.
Chang EJ; Mandelbaum RS; Nusbaum DJ; Violette CJ; Matsushima K; Klar M; Matsuzaki S; Machida H; Kanao H; Roman LD; Matsuo K
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(6):1354-1362. PubMed ID: 31743796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Complications After Uterosacral Ligament Suspension Versus Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation at Vaginal Hysterectomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database.
Stairs J; Jain M; Chen I; Clancy A
Urogynecology (Phila); 2022 Dec; 28(12):834-841. PubMed ID: 36409640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Perioperative Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy Based on Route of Concurrent Hysterectomy: A Secondary Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database.
Cardenas-Trowers O; Stewart JR; Meriwether KV; Francis SL; Gupta A
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(4):953-958. PubMed ID: 31404710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Uterosacral vault suspension (USLS) at the time of hysterectomy: laparoscopic versus vaginal approach.
Houlihan S; Kim-Fine S; Birch C; Tang S; Brennand EA
Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Apr; 30(4):611-621. PubMed ID: 30393822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Minimizing Risks in Minimally Invasive Surgery: Rates of Surgical Site Infection Across Subtypes of Laparoscopic Hysterectomy.
Brown O; Geynisman-Tan J; Gillingham A; Collins S; Lewicky-Gaupp C; Kenton K; Mueller M
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(6):1370-1376.e1. PubMed ID: 31672589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Minimally Invasive Sacrohysteropexy Versus Vaginal Hysterectomy With Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Prospective Randomized Non-Inferiority Trial.
Hwang WY; Jeon MJ; Suh DH
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2024 May; 31(5):406-413. PubMed ID: 38336010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Incidence and risk factors for venous thromboembolism events after different routes of pelvic organ prolapse repairs.
Chong W; Bui AH; Menhaji K
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Aug; 223(2):268.e1-268.e26. PubMed ID: 32413430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of complications and prolapse recurrence between laparoscopic and vaginal uterosacral ligament suspension for the treatment of vaginal prolapse.
Turner LC; Lavelle ES; Shepherd JP
Int Urogynecol J; 2016 May; 27(5):797-803. PubMed ID: 26658893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes, Readmission, and Reoperation for Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation, Uterosacral Ligament Suspension, and Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy.
Yadav GS; Gaddam N; Rahn DD
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2021 Mar; 27(3):133-139. PubMed ID: 33620894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of 30-day Complication Rates between Laparoscopic Myomectomy and Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for the Treatment of Uterine Leiomyoma in Women Older Than Age 40.
Sheyn D; Bretschnieder CE; Mahajan ST; El-Nashar S; Billow M; Ninivaggio CS
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(6):1076-1082. PubMed ID: 30385429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of Vaginal Mesh Hysteropexy vs Vaginal Hysterectomy With Uterosacral Ligament Suspension on Treatment Failure in Women With Uterovaginal Prolapse: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Nager CW; Visco AG; Richter HE; Rardin CR; Rogers RG; Harvie HS; Zyczynski HM; Paraiso MFR; Mazloomdoost D; Grey S; Sridhar A; Wallace D;
JAMA; 2019 Sep; 322(11):1054-1065. PubMed ID: 31529008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension and sacral colpopexy: results and complications.
Filmar GA; Fisher HW; Aranda E; Lotze PM
Int Urogynecol J; 2014 Dec; 25(12):1645-53. PubMed ID: 24819328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Apical Suspension Utilization at the Time of Vaginal Hysterectomy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Varies With Surgeon Specialty.
Sheyn D; El-Nashar S; Mahajan ST; Mangel JM; Chapman GC; Hijaz AK
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2020 Jun; 26(6):370-375. PubMed ID: 30807336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Route of Hysterectomy at the Time of Sacrocolpopexy: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.
Gupta A; Ton JB; Maheshwari D; Schroeder MN; Small AN; Jia X; Demtchouk VO; Hoke TP; Murphy M
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2022 Feb; 28(2):85-89. PubMed ID: 34333501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mesh Exposure Following Vaginal Versus Laparoscopic Hysterectomy at the Time of Sacrocolpopexy.
Woodburn KL; El Haraki AS; Sokol AI; Gutman RE; Matthews CA
Int Urogynecol J; 2022 Nov; 33(11):3213-3220. PubMed ID: 35157096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. High Uterosacral Ligaments Suspension for Post-Hysterectomy Vaginal Vault Prolapse Repair.
Barba M; Cola A; Melocchi T; De Vicari D; Costa C; Volontè S; Sandullo L; Frigerio M
Medicina (Kaunas); 2024 Feb; 60(2):. PubMed ID: 38399607
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The impact of surgeon volume on perioperative adverse events in women undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomy for the large uterus.
Bretschneider CE; Frazzini Padilla P; Das D; Jelovsek JE; Unger CA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Nov; 219(5):490.e1-490.e8. PubMed ID: 30222939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
