These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32450878)

  • 1. Standard setting made easy: validating the Equal Z-score (EZ) method for setting cut-score for clinical examinations.
    Shulruf B; Yang YY; Huang PH; Yang LY; Huang CC; Huang CC; Liu CW; Huang SS; Chen CH; Lee FY; Kao SY
    BMC Med Educ; 2020 May; 20(1):167. PubMed ID: 32450878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Equal Z standard-setting method to estimate the minimum number of panelists for a medical school’s objective structured clinical examination in Taiwan: a simulation study.
    Yang YY; Huang PH; Yang LY; Huang CC; Liu CW; Huang SS; Chen CH; Lee FY; Kao SY; Shulruf B
    J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2022; 19():27. PubMed ID: 36252990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparing the cut score for the borderline group method and borderline regression method with norm-referenced standard setting in an objective structured clinical examination in medical school in Korea.
    Park SY; Lee SH; Kim MJ; Ji KH; Ryu JH
    J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2021; 18():25. PubMed ID: 34565121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Factor analysis can be a useful standard setting tool in a high stakes OSCE assessment.
    Chesser AM; Laing MR; Miedzybrodzka ZH; Brittenden J; Heys SD
    Med Educ; 2004 Aug; 38(8):825-31. PubMed ID: 15271042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Standard setting: a comparison of case-author and modified borderline-group methods in a small-scale OSCE.
    Humphrey-Murto S; MacFadyen JC
    Acad Med; 2002 Jul; 77(7):729-32. PubMed ID: 12114151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Simulation-based examinations in physician assistant education: A comparison of two standard-setting methods.
    Carlson J; Tomkowiak J; Knott P
    J Physician Assist Educ; 2010; 21(2):7-14. PubMed ID: 21141047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of two methods of standard setting: the performance of the three-level Angoff method.
    Jalili M; Hejri SM; Norcini JJ
    Med Educ; 2011 Dec; 45(12):1199-208. PubMed ID: 22122428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing musculoskeletal examination skills and diagnostic reasoning of 4th year medical students using a novel objective structured clinical exam.
    Stansfield RB; Diponio L; Craig C; Zeller J; Chadd E; Miller J; Monrad S
    BMC Med Educ; 2016 Oct; 16(1):268. PubMed ID: 27741946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Standard setting in an objective structured clinical examination: use of global ratings of borderline performance to determine the passing score.
    Wilkinson TJ; Newble DI; Frampton CM
    Med Educ; 2001 Nov; 35(11):1043-9. PubMed ID: 11703640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Order effects in high stakes undergraduate examinations: an analysis of 5 years of administrative data in one UK medical school.
    Burt J; Abel G; Barclay M; Evans R; Benson J; Gurnell M
    BMJ Open; 2016 Oct; 6(10):e012541. PubMed ID: 27729351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessing the reliability of the borderline regression method as a standard setting procedure for objective structured clinical examination.
    Hejri SM; Jalili M; Muijtjens AM; Van Der Vleuten CP
    J Res Med Sci; 2013 Oct; 18(10):887-91. PubMed ID: 24497861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The relationship between second-year medical students' OSCE scores and USMLE Step 1 scores.
    Simon SR; Volkan K; Hamann C; Duffey C; Fletcher SW
    Med Teach; 2002 Sep; 24(5):535-9. PubMed ID: 12450476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparing Standard Setting Methods for Objective Structured Clinical Examinations in a Caribbean Medical School.
    Dwivedi NR; Vijayashankar NP; Hansda M; Dubey AK; Nwachukwu F; Curran V; Jillwin J
    J Med Educ Curric Dev; 2020; 7():2382120520981992. PubMed ID: 33447662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluating the validity evidence of an OSCE: results from a new medical school.
    Yazbeck Karam V; Park YS; Tekian A; Youssef N
    BMC Med Educ; 2018 Dec; 18(1):313. PubMed ID: 30572876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Setting defensible standards in small cohort OSCEs: Understanding better when borderline regression can 'work'.
    Homer M; Fuller R; Hallam J; Pell G
    Med Teach; 2020 Mar; 42(3):306-315. PubMed ID: 31657266
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How well do second-year students learn physical diagnosis? Observational study of an Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE).
    Hamann C; Volkan K; Fishman MB; Silvestri RC; Simon SR; Fletcher SW
    BMC Med Educ; 2002; 2():1. PubMed ID: 11888484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Standard Setting Methods for Pass/Fail Decisions on High-Stakes Objective Structured Clinical Examinations: A Validity Study.
    Yousuf N; Violato C; Zuberi RW
    Teach Learn Med; 2015; 27(3):280-91. PubMed ID: 26158330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Borderline grades in high stakes clinical examinations: resolving examiner uncertainty.
    Shulruf B; Adelstein BA; Damodaran A; Harris P; Kennedy S; O'Sullivan A; Taylor S
    BMC Med Educ; 2018 Nov; 18(1):272. PubMed ID: 30458741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Developing a video-based method to compare and adjust examiner effects in fully nested OSCEs.
    Yeates P; Cope N; Hawarden A; Bradshaw H; McCray G; Homer M
    Med Educ; 2019 Mar; 53(3):250-263. PubMed ID: 30575092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Analysis of quality and feasibility of an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) in preclinical dental education.
    Eberhard L; Hassel A; Bäumer A; Becker F; Beck-Mubotter J; Bömicke W; Corcodel N; Cosgarea R; Eiffler C; Giannakopoulos NN; Kraus T; Mahabadi J; Rues S; Schmitter M; Wolff D; Wege KC
    Eur J Dent Educ; 2011 Aug; 15(3):172-8. PubMed ID: 21762322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.