181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32451195)
1. Combining the Ultrasound Features of Primary Tumor and Axillary Lymph Nodes Can Reduce False-Negative Rate during the Prediction of High Axillary Node Burden in BI-RADS Category 4 or 5 Breast Cancer Lesions.
Yi CB; Ding ZY; Deng J; Ye XH; Chen L; Zong M; Li CY
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2020 Aug; 46(8):1941-1948. PubMed ID: 32451195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prediction of high nodal burden with ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in clinically node-negative breast cancer patients.
Kim WH; Kim HJ; Lee SM; Cho SH; Shin KM; Lee SY; Lim JK
Cancer Imaging; 2019 Feb; 19(1):4. PubMed ID: 30709369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Preoperative Axillary Ultrasound in the Selection of Patients With a Heavy Axillary Tumor Burden in Early-Stage Breast Cancer: What Leads to False-Positive Results?
Zhu Y; Zhou W; Jia XH; Huang O; Zhan WW
J Ultrasound Med; 2018 Jun; 37(6):1357-1365. PubMed ID: 29424451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration of Non-palpable and Suspicious Axillary Lymph Nodes with Subsequent Removal after Tattooing: False-Negative Results and Concordance with Sentinel Lymph Nodes.
Kim WH; Kim HJ; Jung JH; Park HY; Lee J; Kim WW; Park JY; Cheon H; Lee SM; Cho SH; Shin KM; Kim GC
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 Nov; 43(11):2576-2581. PubMed ID: 28830644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Breast cancer patients with a negative axillary ultrasound may have clinically significant nodal metastasis.
Keelan S; Heeney A; Downey E; Hegarty A; Roche T; Power C; Mhuircheartaigh NN; Duke D; Kerr J; Hambly N; Hill A
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2021 Jun; 187(2):303-310. PubMed ID: 33837870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. False negative results in axillary lymph nodes by ultrasonography and ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration in patients with invasive ductal carcinoma.
Park SH; Kim EK; Park BW; Kim SI; Moon HJ; Kim MJ
Ultraschall Med; 2013 Dec; 34(6):559-67. PubMed ID: 23258771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A multivariable model of ultrasound and clinicopathological features for predicting axillary nodal burden of breast cancer: potential to prevent unnecessary axillary lymph node dissection.
Yang L; Gu Y; Wang B; Sun M; Zhang L; Shi L; Wang Y; Zhang Z; Yin Y
BMC Cancer; 2023 Dec; 23(1):1264. PubMed ID: 38129804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Axillary Staging of Early-Stage Invasive Breast Cancer by Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology: Which Ultrasound Criteria for Classifying Abnormal Lymph Nodes Should Be Adopted in the Post-ACOSOG Z0011 Trial Era?
Zhu Y; Zhou W; Zhou JQ; Fei XC; Ye TJ; Huang O; Chen XS; Zhan WW
J Ultrasound Med; 2016 May; 35(5):885-93. PubMed ID: 27009312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinicopathologic and Ultrasound Variables Associated With a Heavy Axillary Nodal Tumor Burden in Invasive Breast Carcinoma.
Li JW; Tong YY; Jiang YZ; Shui XJ; Shi ZT; Chang C
J Ultrasound Med; 2019 Jul; 38(7):1747-1755. PubMed ID: 30480341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Adding contrast-enhanced ultrasound markers to conventional axillary ultrasound improves specificity for predicting axillary lymph node metastasis in patients with breast cancer.
Du LW; Liu HL; Gong HY; Ling LJ; Wang S; Li CY; Zong M
Br J Radiol; 2021 Feb; 94(1118):20200874. PubMed ID: 32976019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Combining primary tumor features derived from conventional and contrast-enhanced ultrasound facilitates the prediction of positive axillary lymph nodes in Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System category 4 malignant breast lesions.
Du Y; Yi CB; Du LW; Gong HY; Ling LJ; Ye XH; Zong M; Li CY
Diagn Interv Radiol; 2023 May; 29(3):469-477. PubMed ID: 36994900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Redefining ultrasound appearance criteria of positive axillary lymph nodes.
Duchesne N; Jaffey J; Florack P; Duchesne S
Can Assoc Radiol J; 2005 Dec; 56(5):289-96. PubMed ID: 16579022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Establishment of a preoperative prediction model for axillary lymph node burden in patients with early breast cancer].
Sun XF; Zhang Q; Niu LJ; Huang T
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2021 May; 43(5):563-568. PubMed ID: 34034476
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Predictive value of combining clinicopathological, multimodal ultrasonic characteristics in axillary lymph nodal metastasis burden of patients with cT1-2N0 breast cancer.
Duan Y; Zhu Y; Nie F; Guan L; Jia Y; Chen K; Wang W
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2022; 81(3):255-269. PubMed ID: 35342081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Axillary lymph node dissection is not obligatory in breast cancer patients with biopsy-proven axillary lymph node metastasis.
Yoo TK; Kang BJ; Kim SH; Song BJ; Ahn J; Park WC; Chae BJ
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2020 Jun; 181(2):403-409. PubMed ID: 32328848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparative analysis of axillary nodal burden in ultrasound/biopsy positive axilla vs ultrasound negative sentinel lymph node biopsy positive axilla.
Tandon M; Ball W; Kirby R; Soumian S; Narayanan S
Breast Dis; 2019; 38(3-4):93-96. PubMed ID: 30909179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The impact of axillary ultrasound with biopsy in overtreatment of early breast cancer.
Del Riego J; Diaz-Ruiz MJ; Teixidó M; Ribé J; Vilagran M; Canales L; Sentís M;
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Jan; 98():158-164. PubMed ID: 29279156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Artificial neural network models to predict nodal status in clinically node-negative breast cancer.
Dihge L; Ohlsson M; Edén P; Bendahl PO; Rydén L
BMC Cancer; 2019 Jun; 19(1):610. PubMed ID: 31226956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Preoperative Axillary Ultrasound versus Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Patients with Early Breast Cancer.
Rukanskienė D; Veikutis V; Jonaitienė E; Basevičiūtė M; Kunigiškis D; Paukštaitienė R; Čepulienė D; Poškienė L; Boguševičius A
Medicina (Kaunas); 2020 Mar; 56(3):. PubMed ID: 32183080
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Axillary lymph nodes suspicious for breast cancer metastasis: sampling with US-guided 14-gauge core-needle biopsy--clinical experience in 100 patients.
Abe H; Schmidt RA; Kulkarni K; Sennett CA; Mueller JS; Newstead GM
Radiology; 2009 Jan; 250(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 18955508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
