These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32451195)
1. Combining the Ultrasound Features of Primary Tumor and Axillary Lymph Nodes Can Reduce False-Negative Rate during the Prediction of High Axillary Node Burden in BI-RADS Category 4 or 5 Breast Cancer Lesions. Yi CB; Ding ZY; Deng J; Ye XH; Chen L; Zong M; Li CY Ultrasound Med Biol; 2020 Aug; 46(8):1941-1948. PubMed ID: 32451195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prediction of high nodal burden with ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in clinically node-negative breast cancer patients. Kim WH; Kim HJ; Lee SM; Cho SH; Shin KM; Lee SY; Lim JK Cancer Imaging; 2019 Feb; 19(1):4. PubMed ID: 30709369 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Preoperative Axillary Ultrasound in the Selection of Patients With a Heavy Axillary Tumor Burden in Early-Stage Breast Cancer: What Leads to False-Positive Results? Zhu Y; Zhou W; Jia XH; Huang O; Zhan WW J Ultrasound Med; 2018 Jun; 37(6):1357-1365. PubMed ID: 29424451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration of Non-palpable and Suspicious Axillary Lymph Nodes with Subsequent Removal after Tattooing: False-Negative Results and Concordance with Sentinel Lymph Nodes. Kim WH; Kim HJ; Jung JH; Park HY; Lee J; Kim WW; Park JY; Cheon H; Lee SM; Cho SH; Shin KM; Kim GC Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 Nov; 43(11):2576-2581. PubMed ID: 28830644 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The new perspective of PET/CT for axillary nodal staging in early breast cancer patients according to ACOSOG Z0011 trial PET/CT axillary staging according to Z0011. Kong E; Choi J Nucl Med Commun; 2021 Dec; 42(12):1369-1374. PubMed ID: 34392296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Breast cancer patients with a negative axillary ultrasound may have clinically significant nodal metastasis. Keelan S; Heeney A; Downey E; Hegarty A; Roche T; Power C; Mhuircheartaigh NN; Duke D; Kerr J; Hambly N; Hill A Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2021 Jun; 187(2):303-310. PubMed ID: 33837870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. False negative results in axillary lymph nodes by ultrasonography and ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration in patients with invasive ductal carcinoma. Park SH; Kim EK; Park BW; Kim SI; Moon HJ; Kim MJ Ultraschall Med; 2013 Dec; 34(6):559-67. PubMed ID: 23258771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A multivariable model of ultrasound and clinicopathological features for predicting axillary nodal burden of breast cancer: potential to prevent unnecessary axillary lymph node dissection. Yang L; Gu Y; Wang B; Sun M; Zhang L; Shi L; Wang Y; Zhang Z; Yin Y BMC Cancer; 2023 Dec; 23(1):1264. PubMed ID: 38129804 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Axillary Staging of Early-Stage Invasive Breast Cancer by Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology: Which Ultrasound Criteria for Classifying Abnormal Lymph Nodes Should Be Adopted in the Post-ACOSOG Z0011 Trial Era? Zhu Y; Zhou W; Zhou JQ; Fei XC; Ye TJ; Huang O; Chen XS; Zhan WW J Ultrasound Med; 2016 May; 35(5):885-93. PubMed ID: 27009312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinicopathologic and Ultrasound Variables Associated With a Heavy Axillary Nodal Tumor Burden in Invasive Breast Carcinoma. Li JW; Tong YY; Jiang YZ; Shui XJ; Shi ZT; Chang C J Ultrasound Med; 2019 Jul; 38(7):1747-1755. PubMed ID: 30480341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Adding contrast-enhanced ultrasound markers to conventional axillary ultrasound improves specificity for predicting axillary lymph node metastasis in patients with breast cancer. Du LW; Liu HL; Gong HY; Ling LJ; Wang S; Li CY; Zong M Br J Radiol; 2021 Feb; 94(1118):20200874. PubMed ID: 32976019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Combining primary tumor features derived from conventional and contrast-enhanced ultrasound facilitates the prediction of positive axillary lymph nodes in Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System category 4 malignant breast lesions. Du Y; Yi CB; Du LW; Gong HY; Ling LJ; Ye XH; Zong M; Li CY Diagn Interv Radiol; 2023 May; 29(3):469-477. PubMed ID: 36994900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Establishment of a preoperative prediction model for axillary lymph node burden in patients with early breast cancer]. Sun XF; Zhang Q; Niu LJ; Huang T Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2021 May; 43(5):563-568. PubMed ID: 34034476 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Predictive value of combining clinicopathological, multimodal ultrasonic characteristics in axillary lymph nodal metastasis burden of patients with cT1-2N0 breast cancer. Duan Y; Zhu Y; Nie F; Guan L; Jia Y; Chen K; Wang W Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2022; 81(3):255-269. PubMed ID: 35342081 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Axillary lymph node dissection is not obligatory in breast cancer patients with biopsy-proven axillary lymph node metastasis. Yoo TK; Kang BJ; Kim SH; Song BJ; Ahn J; Park WC; Chae BJ Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2020 Jun; 181(2):403-409. PubMed ID: 32328848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparative analysis of axillary nodal burden in ultrasound/biopsy positive axilla vs ultrasound negative sentinel lymph node biopsy positive axilla. Tandon M; Ball W; Kirby R; Soumian S; Narayanan S Breast Dis; 2019; 38(3-4):93-96. PubMed ID: 30909179 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The impact of axillary ultrasound with biopsy in overtreatment of early breast cancer. Del Riego J; Diaz-Ruiz MJ; Teixidó M; Ribé J; Vilagran M; Canales L; Sentís M; Eur J Radiol; 2018 Jan; 98():158-164. PubMed ID: 29279156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Artificial neural network models to predict nodal status in clinically node-negative breast cancer. Dihge L; Ohlsson M; Edén P; Bendahl PO; Rydén L BMC Cancer; 2019 Jun; 19(1):610. PubMed ID: 31226956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Preoperative Axillary Ultrasound versus Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Patients with Early Breast Cancer. Rukanskienė D; Veikutis V; Jonaitienė E; Basevičiūtė M; Kunigiškis D; Paukštaitienė R; Čepulienė D; Poškienė L; Boguševičius A Medicina (Kaunas); 2020 Mar; 56(3):. PubMed ID: 32183080 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]