These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32451687)

  • 1. Spinal fusion procedures in the adult and young population: a systematic review on allogenic bone and synthetic grafts when compared to autologous bone.
    Salamanna F; Tschon M; Borsari V; Pagani S; Martini L; Fini M
    J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2020 May; 31(6):51. PubMed ID: 32451687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Synthetic bone graft versus autograft or allograft for spinal fusion: a systematic review.
    Buser Z; Brodke DS; Youssef JA; Meisel HJ; Myhre SL; Hashimoto R; Park JB; Tim Yoon S; Wang JC
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Oct; 25(4):509-516. PubMed ID: 27231812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Iliac crest bone graft versus cell-based grafts to augment spinal fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Gordon A; Newsome F; Ahern DP; McDonnell JM; Cunniffe G; Butler JS
    Eur Spine J; 2024 Jan; 33(1):253-263. PubMed ID: 37740784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Efficacy and safety of bone substitutes in lumbar spinal fusion: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Feng JT; Yang XG; Wang F; He X; Hu YC
    Eur Spine J; 2020 Jun; 29(6):1261-1276. PubMed ID: 31872300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Osteoconductive bone graft extenders in posterolateral thoracolumbar spinal fusion: a systematic review.
    Alsaleh KA; Tougas CA; Roffey DM; Wai EK
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Jul; 37(16):E993-1000. PubMed ID: 22414999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perioperative complications of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 on an absorbable collagen sponge versus iliac crest bone graft for posterior cervical arthrodesis.
    Crawford CH; Carreon LY; McGinnis MD; Campbell MJ; Glassman SD
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jun; 34(13):1390-4. PubMed ID: 19440166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In vivo evaluation of bone marrow stromal-derived osteoblasts-porous calcium phosphate ceramic composites as bone graft substitute for lumbar intervertebral spinal fusion.
    Kai T; Shao-qing G; Geng-ting D
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Aug; 28(15):1653-8. PubMed ID: 12897487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biological substitutes/extenders for spinal arthrodesis: which agents are cost-effective?
    Hsu WK; Hashimoto RE; Berven SH; Nassr A
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Oct; 39(22 Suppl 1):S86-98. PubMed ID: 25299264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of 45S5 Bioactive Glass in A Standard Calcium Phosphate Collagen Bone Graft Substitute on the Posterolateral Fusion of Rabbit Spine.
    Pugely AJ; Petersen EB; DeVries-Watson N; Fredericks DC
    Iowa Orthop J; 2017; 37():193-198. PubMed ID: 28852357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A review of demineralized bone matrices for spinal fusion: the evidence for efficacy.
    Aghdasi B; Montgomery SR; Daubs MD; Wang JC
    Surgeon; 2013 Feb; 11(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 23040457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cell based therapies as compared to autologous bone grafts for spinal arthrodesis.
    Khashan M; Inoue S; Berven SH
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Oct; 38(21):1885-91. PubMed ID: 23873235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Investigating the efficacy of allograft cellular bone matrix for spinal fusion: a systematic review of the literature.
    Diaz RR; Savardekar AR; Brougham JR; Terrell D; Sin A
    Neurosurg Focus; 2021 Jun; 50(6):E11. PubMed ID: 34062505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Single-level instrumented posterolateral fusion of lumbar spine with beta-tricalcium phosphate versus autograft: a prospective, randomized study with 3-year follow-up.
    Dai LY; Jiang LS
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 May; 33(12):1299-304. PubMed ID: 18496340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A post-market surveillance analysis of the safety of hydroxyapatite-derived products as bone graft extenders or substitutes for spine fusion.
    Barbanti Brodano G; Griffoni C; Zanotti B; Gasbarrini A; Bandiera S; Ghermandi R; Boriani S
    Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2015 Oct; 19(19):3548-55. PubMed ID: 26502842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prospective comparison of autograft vs. allograft for adult posterolateral lumbar spine fusion: differences among freeze-dried, frozen, and mixed grafts.
    An HS; Lynch K; Toth J
    J Spinal Disord; 1995 Apr; 8(2):131-5. PubMed ID: 7606120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. RhBMP-2 versus iliac crest bone graft for lumbar spine fusion: a randomized, controlled trial in patients over sixty years of age.
    Glassman SD; Carreon LY; Djurasovic M; Campbell MJ; Puno RM; Johnson JR; Dimar JR
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Dec; 33(26):2843-9. PubMed ID: 19092613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of bone grafts for posterior spinal fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
    Price CT; Connolly JF; Carantzas AC; Ilyas I
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Apr; 28(8):793-8. PubMed ID: 12698123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Is dibotermin alfa a cost-effective substitute for autologous iliac crest bone graft in single level lumbar interbody spine fusion?
    Svedbom A; Paech D; Leonard C; Donnell D; Song F; Boszcyk B; Rothenfluh DA; Lloyd A; Borgman B
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2015 Nov; 31(11):2145-56. PubMed ID: 26359326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Grafton and local bone have comparable outcomes to iliac crest bone in instrumented single-level lumbar fusions.
    Kang J; An H; Hilibrand A; Yoon ST; Kavanagh E; Boden S
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 May; 37(12):1083-91. PubMed ID: 22076647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In vivo evaluation of coralline hydroxyapatite and direct current electrical stimulation in lumbar spinal fusion.
    Bozic KJ; Glazer PA; Zurakowski D; Simon BJ; Lipson SJ; Hayes WC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1999 Oct; 24(20):2127-33. PubMed ID: 10543011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.