BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32452435)

  • 1. The influence of time constraints on posture choices during an end-state comfort task.
    Modersitzki R; Studenka BE
    Hum Mov Sci; 2020 Jun; 71():102618. PubMed ID: 32452435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Choice of end-state comfort is dependent upon the time spent at the beginning-state and the precision requirement of the end-state.
    Studenka BE; Gamble TG; Hernandez-Zuniga J
    Hum Mov Sci; 2023 Aug; 90():103112. PubMed ID: 37290227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Individual differences in motor planning during a multi-segment object manipulation task.
    Seegelke C; Hughes CM; Schütz C; Schack T
    Exp Brain Res; 2012 Oct; 222(1-2):125-36. PubMed ID: 22885998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The influence of reducing intermediate target constraints on grasp posture planning during a three-segment object manipulation task.
    Seegelke C; Hughes CM; Knoblauch A; Schack T
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 Feb; 233(2):529-38. PubMed ID: 25370347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dual-task interference in action programming and action planning - Evidence from the end-state comfort effect.
    Löhr-Limpens M; Göhringer F; Schenk T
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2022 Aug; 228():103637. PubMed ID: 35690027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of multiple planning constraints on the development of grasp posture planning in 6- to 10-year-old children.
    Stöckel T; Hughes CM
    Dev Psychol; 2015 Sep; 51(9):1254-61. PubMed ID: 26192045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The influence of action possibility and end-state comfort on motor imagery of manual action sequences.
    Seegelke C; Hughes CM
    Brain Cogn; 2015 Dec; 101():12-6. PubMed ID: 26544603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Limits of end-state planning.
    Hermens F; Kral D; Rosenbaum DA
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 May; 148():148-62. PubMed ID: 24531145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Perturbations in action goal influence bimanual grasp posture planning.
    Hughes CM; Seegelke C
    J Mot Behav; 2013; 45(6):473-8. PubMed ID: 24006878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. End-state comfort trumps handedness in object manipulation.
    Coelho CJ; Studenka BE; Rosenbaum DA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Apr; 40(2):718-30. PubMed ID: 24294873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Corrections in grasp posture in response to modifications of action goals.
    Hughes CM; Seegelke C; Spiegel MA; Oehmichen C; Hammes J; Schack T
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(9):e43015. PubMed ID: 22970119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Constraints on grip selection in cerebral palsy. Minimising discomfort.
    Steenbergen B; Hulstijn W; Dortmans S
    Exp Brain Res; 2000 Oct; 134(3):385-97. PubMed ID: 11045363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The influence of initial and final precision on motor planning: individual differences in end-state comfort during unimanual grasping and placing.
    Hughes CM; Seegelke C; Schack T
    J Mot Behav; 2012; 44(3):195-201. PubMed ID: 22551086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Precision hypothesis and the end-state comfort effect.
    Short MW; Cauraugh JH
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1999 Jan; 100(3):243-52. PubMed ID: 9894689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Precise movements in awkward postures: A direct test of the precision hypothesis of the end-state comfort effect.
    Herbort O; Kunde W
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 May; 45(5):681-696. PubMed ID: 30958021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Combined effects of planning and execution constraints on bimanual task performance.
    Janssen L; Beuting M; Meulenbroek R; Steenbergen B
    Exp Brain Res; 2009 Jan; 192(1):61-73. PubMed ID: 18751972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Too much anticipation? Large anticipatory adjustments of grasping movements to minimal object manipulations.
    Herbort O
    Hum Mov Sci; 2015 Aug; 42():100-16. PubMed ID: 26004123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. End-state comfort and joint configuration variance during reaching.
    Solnik S; Pazin N; Coelho CJ; Rosenbaum DA; Scholz JP; Zatsiorsky VM; Latash ML
    Exp Brain Res; 2013 Mar; 225(3):431-42. PubMed ID: 23288326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Representation of grasp postures and anticipatory motor planning in children.
    Stöckel T; Hughes CM; Schack T
    Psychol Res; 2012 Nov; 76(6):768-76. PubMed ID: 22075763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The influence of action execution on end-state comfort and underlying movement kinematics: An examination of right and left handed participants.
    Scharoun SM; Gonzalez DA; Bryden PJ; Roy EA
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2016 Feb; 164():1-9. PubMed ID: 26705898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.