These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32452435)

  • 1. The influence of time constraints on posture choices during an end-state comfort task.
    Modersitzki R; Studenka BE
    Hum Mov Sci; 2020 Jun; 71():102618. PubMed ID: 32452435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Choice of end-state comfort is dependent upon the time spent at the beginning-state and the precision requirement of the end-state.
    Studenka BE; Gamble TG; Hernandez-Zuniga J
    Hum Mov Sci; 2023 Aug; 90():103112. PubMed ID: 37290227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Individual differences in motor planning during a multi-segment object manipulation task.
    Seegelke C; Hughes CM; Schütz C; Schack T
    Exp Brain Res; 2012 Oct; 222(1-2):125-36. PubMed ID: 22885998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The influence of reducing intermediate target constraints on grasp posture planning during a three-segment object manipulation task.
    Seegelke C; Hughes CM; Knoblauch A; Schack T
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 Feb; 233(2):529-38. PubMed ID: 25370347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dual-task interference in action programming and action planning - Evidence from the end-state comfort effect.
    Löhr-Limpens M; Göhringer F; Schenk T
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2022 Aug; 228():103637. PubMed ID: 35690027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Anticipation (second-order motor planning) is stored in memory - processing of grasp postures in a priming paradigm.
    Kämpfer J; Vogel L; Schack T
    Front Psychol; 2024; 15():1393254. PubMed ID: 39086432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of multiple planning constraints on the development of grasp posture planning in 6- to 10-year-old children.
    Stöckel T; Hughes CM
    Dev Psychol; 2015 Sep; 51(9):1254-61. PubMed ID: 26192045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The influence of action possibility and end-state comfort on motor imagery of manual action sequences.
    Seegelke C; Hughes CM
    Brain Cogn; 2015 Dec; 101():12-6. PubMed ID: 26544603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Limits of end-state planning.
    Hermens F; Kral D; Rosenbaum DA
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 May; 148():148-62. PubMed ID: 24531145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perturbations in action goal influence bimanual grasp posture planning.
    Hughes CM; Seegelke C
    J Mot Behav; 2013; 45(6):473-8. PubMed ID: 24006878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. End-state comfort trumps handedness in object manipulation.
    Coelho CJ; Studenka BE; Rosenbaum DA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Apr; 40(2):718-30. PubMed ID: 24294873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Corrections in grasp posture in response to modifications of action goals.
    Hughes CM; Seegelke C; Spiegel MA; Oehmichen C; Hammes J; Schack T
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(9):e43015. PubMed ID: 22970119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Constraints on grip selection in cerebral palsy. Minimising discomfort.
    Steenbergen B; Hulstijn W; Dortmans S
    Exp Brain Res; 2000 Oct; 134(3):385-97. PubMed ID: 11045363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The influence of initial and final precision on motor planning: individual differences in end-state comfort during unimanual grasping and placing.
    Hughes CM; Seegelke C; Schack T
    J Mot Behav; 2012; 44(3):195-201. PubMed ID: 22551086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Precision hypothesis and the end-state comfort effect.
    Short MW; Cauraugh JH
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1999 Jan; 100(3):243-52. PubMed ID: 9894689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Precise movements in awkward postures: A direct test of the precision hypothesis of the end-state comfort effect.
    Herbort O; Kunde W
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 May; 45(5):681-696. PubMed ID: 30958021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Combined effects of planning and execution constraints on bimanual task performance.
    Janssen L; Beuting M; Meulenbroek R; Steenbergen B
    Exp Brain Res; 2009 Jan; 192(1):61-73. PubMed ID: 18751972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Too much anticipation? Large anticipatory adjustments of grasping movements to minimal object manipulations.
    Herbort O
    Hum Mov Sci; 2015 Aug; 42():100-16. PubMed ID: 26004123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. End-state comfort and joint configuration variance during reaching.
    Solnik S; Pazin N; Coelho CJ; Rosenbaum DA; Scholz JP; Zatsiorsky VM; Latash ML
    Exp Brain Res; 2013 Mar; 225(3):431-42. PubMed ID: 23288326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Representation of grasp postures and anticipatory motor planning in children.
    Stöckel T; Hughes CM; Schack T
    Psychol Res; 2012 Nov; 76(6):768-76. PubMed ID: 22075763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.