These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32453024)
1. Stroop N450 reflects both stimulus conflict and response conflict. Huang B; Chen C Neuroreport; 2020 Aug; 31(12):851-856. PubMed ID: 32453024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dissociated stimulus and response conflict effect in the Stroop task: evidence from evoked brain potentials and brain oscillations. Zhao J; Liang WK; Juan CH; Wang L; Wang S; Zhu Z Biol Psychol; 2015 Jan; 104():130-8. PubMed ID: 25511611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Behavioral and ERP indices of response conflict in Stroop and flanker tasks. Tillman CM; Wiens S Psychophysiology; 2011 Oct; 48(10):1405-11. PubMed ID: 21457276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sequential conflict resolution under multiple concurrent conflicts: An ERP study. Rey-Mermet A; Gade M; Steinhauser M Neuroimage; 2019 Mar; 188():411-418. PubMed ID: 30562575 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Stimulus and response conflict in the color-word Stroop task: a combined electro-myography and event-related potential study. Szucs D; Soltész F Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 1325():63-76. PubMed ID: 20153298 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Supine body posture reduces cognitive conflict processing: Evidence from N450 Stroop interference. Sun CK; Harmon-Jones E Psychophysiology; 2021 Jan; 58(1):e13693. PubMed ID: 32996615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Neural time course of conflict adaptation effects on the Stroop task. Larson MJ; Kaufman DA; Perlstein WM Neuropsychologia; 2009 Feb; 47(3):663-70. PubMed ID: 19071142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Time-frequency analysis of the event-related potentials associated with the Stroop test. Ergen M; Saban S; Kirmizi-Alsan E; Uslu A; Keskin-Ergen Y; Demiralp T Int J Psychophysiol; 2014 Dec; 94(3):463-72. PubMed ID: 25135670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Asymmetry in stimulus and response conflict processing across the adult lifespan: ERP and EMG evidence. Killikelly C; Szűcs D Cortex; 2013; 49(10):2888-903. PubMed ID: 24134924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Relationship of regular physical activity with neuroelectric indices of interference processing in young adults. Aly M; Kojima H Psychophysiology; 2020 Dec; 57(12):e13674. PubMed ID: 33460156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. ERP correlates of the conflict level in the multi-response Stroop task. Chuderski A; Senderecka M; Kałamała P; Kroczek B; Ociepka M Brain Res; 2016 Nov; 1650():93-102. PubMed ID: 27586410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The neural dynamics of stimulus and response conflict processing as a function of response complexity and task demands. Donohue SE; Appelbaum LG; McKay CC; Woldorff MG Neuropsychologia; 2016 Apr; 84():14-28. PubMed ID: 26827917 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Response competition and response inhibition during different choice-discrimination tasks: evidence from ERP measured inside MRI scanner. Gonzalez-Rosa JJ; Inuggi A; Blasi V; Cursi M; Annovazzi P; Comi G; Falini A; Leocani L Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Jul; 89(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 23664841 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Stroop matching task presents conflict at both the response and nonresponse levels: an event-related potential and electromyography study. Caldas AL; Machado-Pinheiro W; Souza LB; Motta-Ribeiro GC; David IA Psychophysiology; 2012 Sep; 49(9):1215-24. PubMed ID: 22748126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Functional definition of the N450 event-related brain potential marker of conflict processing: a numerical stroop study. Szűcs D; Soltész F BMC Neurosci; 2012 Mar; 13():35. PubMed ID: 22452924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Neural correlates of cognitive control and conflict detection in the Stroop and digit-location tasks. West R Neuropsychologia; 2003; 41(8):1122-35. PubMed ID: 12667546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dissociation between reaction time and pupil dilation in the Stroop task. Hershman R; Henik A J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Oct; 45(10):1899-1909. PubMed ID: 30816765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dissociating stimulus-set and response-set in the context of task-set switching. Kieffaber PD; Kruschke JK; Cho RY; Walker PM; Hetrick WP J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Jun; 39(3):700-19. PubMed ID: 22984990 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Electrophysiological explorations of the bilingual advantage: evidence from a Stroop task. Coderre EL; van Heuven WJ PLoS One; 2014; 9(7):e103424. PubMed ID: 25068723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Neural differences in the temporal cascade of reactive and proactive control for bilinguals and monolinguals. Rainey VR; Stockdale L; Flores-Lamb V; Kahrilas IJ; Mullins TL; Gjorgieva E; Morrison RG; Silton RL Psychophysiology; 2021 Jun; 58(6):e13813. PubMed ID: 33719030 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]