BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32453024)

  • 1. Stroop N450 reflects both stimulus conflict and response conflict.
    Huang B; Chen C
    Neuroreport; 2020 Aug; 31(12):851-856. PubMed ID: 32453024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dissociated stimulus and response conflict effect in the Stroop task: evidence from evoked brain potentials and brain oscillations.
    Zhao J; Liang WK; Juan CH; Wang L; Wang S; Zhu Z
    Biol Psychol; 2015 Jan; 104():130-8. PubMed ID: 25511611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Behavioral and ERP indices of response conflict in Stroop and flanker tasks.
    Tillman CM; Wiens S
    Psychophysiology; 2011 Oct; 48(10):1405-11. PubMed ID: 21457276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sequential conflict resolution under multiple concurrent conflicts: An ERP study.
    Rey-Mermet A; Gade M; Steinhauser M
    Neuroimage; 2019 Mar; 188():411-418. PubMed ID: 30562575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stimulus and response conflict in the color-word Stroop task: a combined electro-myography and event-related potential study.
    Szucs D; Soltész F
    Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 1325():63-76. PubMed ID: 20153298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Supine body posture reduces cognitive conflict processing: Evidence from N450 Stroop interference.
    Sun CK; Harmon-Jones E
    Psychophysiology; 2021 Jan; 58(1):e13693. PubMed ID: 32996615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Neural time course of conflict adaptation effects on the Stroop task.
    Larson MJ; Kaufman DA; Perlstein WM
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Feb; 47(3):663-70. PubMed ID: 19071142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Time-frequency analysis of the event-related potentials associated with the Stroop test.
    Ergen M; Saban S; Kirmizi-Alsan E; Uslu A; Keskin-Ergen Y; Demiralp T
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2014 Dec; 94(3):463-72. PubMed ID: 25135670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Asymmetry in stimulus and response conflict processing across the adult lifespan: ERP and EMG evidence.
    Killikelly C; Szűcs D
    Cortex; 2013; 49(10):2888-903. PubMed ID: 24134924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Relationship of regular physical activity with neuroelectric indices of interference processing in young adults.
    Aly M; Kojima H
    Psychophysiology; 2020 Dec; 57(12):e13674. PubMed ID: 33460156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. ERP correlates of the conflict level in the multi-response Stroop task.
    Chuderski A; Senderecka M; Kałamała P; Kroczek B; Ociepka M
    Brain Res; 2016 Nov; 1650():93-102. PubMed ID: 27586410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The neural dynamics of stimulus and response conflict processing as a function of response complexity and task demands.
    Donohue SE; Appelbaum LG; McKay CC; Woldorff MG
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Apr; 84():14-28. PubMed ID: 26827917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Response competition and response inhibition during different choice-discrimination tasks: evidence from ERP measured inside MRI scanner.
    Gonzalez-Rosa JJ; Inuggi A; Blasi V; Cursi M; Annovazzi P; Comi G; Falini A; Leocani L
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Jul; 89(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 23664841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Stroop matching task presents conflict at both the response and nonresponse levels: an event-related potential and electromyography study.
    Caldas AL; Machado-Pinheiro W; Souza LB; Motta-Ribeiro GC; David IA
    Psychophysiology; 2012 Sep; 49(9):1215-24. PubMed ID: 22748126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Functional definition of the N450 event-related brain potential marker of conflict processing: a numerical stroop study.
    Szűcs D; Soltész F
    BMC Neurosci; 2012 Mar; 13():35. PubMed ID: 22452924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Neural correlates of cognitive control and conflict detection in the Stroop and digit-location tasks.
    West R
    Neuropsychologia; 2003; 41(8):1122-35. PubMed ID: 12667546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dissociation between reaction time and pupil dilation in the Stroop task.
    Hershman R; Henik A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Oct; 45(10):1899-1909. PubMed ID: 30816765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dissociating stimulus-set and response-set in the context of task-set switching.
    Kieffaber PD; Kruschke JK; Cho RY; Walker PM; Hetrick WP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Jun; 39(3):700-19. PubMed ID: 22984990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Electrophysiological explorations of the bilingual advantage: evidence from a Stroop task.
    Coderre EL; van Heuven WJ
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(7):e103424. PubMed ID: 25068723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Neural differences in the temporal cascade of reactive and proactive control for bilinguals and monolinguals.
    Rainey VR; Stockdale L; Flores-Lamb V; Kahrilas IJ; Mullins TL; Gjorgieva E; Morrison RG; Silton RL
    Psychophysiology; 2021 Jun; 58(6):e13813. PubMed ID: 33719030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.