These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32453236)

  • 1. Patient Reported Outcomes in Patients Who Stop Following Up: Are They Doing Better or Worse Than the Patients That Come Back?
    Chen DA; Vaishnav AS; Louie PK; Gang CH; McAnany SJ; Iyer S; Albert TJ; Qureshi SA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2020 Oct; 45(20):1435-1442. PubMed ID: 32453236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Validation of PROMIS Physical Function in MIS TLIF: 2-Year Follow-up.
    Jenkins NW; Parrish JM; Cha EDK; Lynch CP; Sayari AJ; Geoghegan CE; Jadczak CN; Mohan S; Singh K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2020 Nov; 45(22):E1516-E1522. PubMed ID: 32756287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of Depression on Patient-Reported Outcome Measures After Lumbar Spine Decompression.
    Merrill RK; Zebala LP; Peters C; Qureshi SA; McAnany SJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2018 Mar; 43(6):434-439. PubMed ID: 28704333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validity of PROMIS in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a preliminary evaluation.
    Haws BE; Khechen B; Guntin JA; Cardinal KL; Bohl DD; Singh K
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Jul; 29(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 29652236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Effect of the Severity of Preoperative Disability on Patient-Reported Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction Following Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
    Jacob KC; Patel MR; Collins AP; Ribot MA; Pawlowski H; Prabhu MC; Vanjani NN; Singh K
    World Neurosurg; 2022 Mar; 159():e334-e346. PubMed ID: 34942388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A prospective, multi-institutional comparative effectiveness study of lumbar spine surgery in morbidly obese patients: does minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion result in superior outcomes?
    Adogwa O; Carr K; Thompson P; Hoang K; Darlington T; Perez E; Fatemi P; Gottfried O; Cheng J; Isaacs RE
    World Neurosurg; 2015 May; 83(5):860-6. PubMed ID: 25535070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Influence of Presenting Physical Function on Postoperative Patient Satisfaction and Clinical Outcomes Following Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression.
    Jacob KC; Patel MR; Park GA; Gheewala JR; Vanjani NN; Pawlowski H; Prabhu MC; Singh K
    Clin Spine Surg; 2023 Feb; 36(1):E6-E13. PubMed ID: 35759781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Association between muscle health and patient-reported outcomes after lumbar microdiscectomy: early results.
    Song J; Araghi K; Dupont MM; Shahi P; Bovonratwet P; Shinn D; Dalal SS; Melissaridou D; Virk SS; Iyer S; Dowdell JE; Sheha ED; Qureshi SA
    Spine J; 2022 Oct; 22(10):1677-1686. PubMed ID: 35671940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Long-term durability of minimal invasive posterior transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a clinical and radiographic follow-up.
    Rouben D; Casnellie M; Ferguson M
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 Jul; 24(5):288-96. PubMed ID: 20975594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. PROMIS Physical Function Score Strongly Correlates With Legacy Outcome Measures in Minimally Invasive Lumbar Microdiscectomy.
    Khechen B; Haws BE; Patel DV; Bawa MS; Elboghdady IM; Lamoutte EH; Karmarkar SS; Singh K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Mar; 44(6):442-446. PubMed ID: 30095799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Revisions for screw malposition and clinical outcomes after robot-guided lumbar fusion for spondylolisthesis.
    Schröder ML; Staartjes VE
    Neurosurg Focus; 2017 May; 42(5):E12. PubMed ID: 28463610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Is the use of minimally invasive fusion technologies associated with improved outcomes after elective interbody lumbar fusion? Analysis of a nationwide prospective patient-reported outcomes registry.
    McGirt MJ; Parker SL; Mummaneni P; Knightly J; Pfortmiller D; Foley K; Asher AL
    Spine J; 2017 Jul; 17(7):922-932. PubMed ID: 28254672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Laminectomy alone versus fusion for grade 1 lumbar spondylolisthesis in 426 patients from the prospective Quality Outcomes Database.
    Chan AK; Bisson EF; Bydon M; Glassman SD; Foley KT; Potts EA; Shaffrey CI; Shaffrey ME; Coric D; Knightly JJ; Park P; Wang MY; Fu KM; Slotkin JR; Asher AL; Virk MS; Kerezoudis P; Chotai S; DiGiorgio AM; Haid RW; Mummaneni PV
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Nov; 30(2):234-241. PubMed ID: 30544348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Influence of Preoperative Mental Health on PROMIS Physical Function Outcomes Following Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
    Yoo JS; Hrynewycz NM; Brundage TS; Mogilevsky FA; Shah HC; Mehraban N; Singh K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2020 Feb; 45(4):E236-E243. PubMed ID: 31513117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fusion technique does not affect short-term patient-reported outcomes for lumbar degenerative disease.
    Divi SN; Schroeder GD; Goyal DKC; Radcliff KE; Galetta MS; Hilibrand AS; Anderson DG; Kurd MF; Rihn JA; Kaye ID; Woods BR; Vaccaro AR; Kepler CK
    Spine J; 2019 Dec; 19(12):1960-1968. PubMed ID: 31356987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Association between opioid utilization and patient-reported outcome measures following lumbar spine surgery.
    Wague A; O'Donnell JM; Stroud S; Filley A; Rangwalla K; Baldwin A; El Naga AN; Gendelberg D; Berven S
    Spine J; 2024 Jul; 24(7):1183-1191. PubMed ID: 38365008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Do measures of surgical effectiveness at 1 year after lumbar spine surgery accurately predict 2-year outcomes?
    Adogwa O; Elsamadicy AA; Han JL; Cheng J; Karikari I; Bagley CA
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Dec; 25(6):689-696. PubMed ID: 26722957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Minimally invasive versus open fusion for Grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: analysis of the Quality Outcomes Database.
    Mummaneni PV; Bisson EF; Kerezoudis P; Glassman S; Foley K; Slotkin JR; Potts E; Shaffrey M; Shaffrey CI; Coric D; Knightly J; Park P; Fu KM; Devin CJ; Chotai S; Chan AK; Virk M; Asher AL; Bydon M
    Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Aug; 43(2):E11. PubMed ID: 28760035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical outcomes in revision lumbar spine fusions: an observational cohort study.
    Montenegro TS; Gonzalez GA; Saiegh FA; Philipp L; Hines K; Hattar E; Franco D; Mahtabfar A; Keppetipola KM; Leibold A; Atallah E; Fatema U; Thalheimer S; Wu C; Prasad SK; Jallo J; Heller J; Sharan A; Harrop J
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2021 Aug; 35(4):437-445. PubMed ID: 34359034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Patients with predominantly back pain at the time of lumbar fusion for low-grade spondylolisthesis experience similar clinical improvement to patients with predominantly leg pain: mid-term results.
    Khan JM; Harada GK; Basques BA; Nolte MT; Louie PK; Iloanya M; Tchalukov K; Berkowitz M; Derman P; Colman M; An HS
    Spine J; 2020 Feb; 20(2):276-282. PubMed ID: 31563578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.