175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32453860)
1. Capillary zone electrophoresis separation and collection of spermatozoa for the forensic analysis of sexual assault evidence.
Wright SN; Huge BJ; Dovichi NJ
Electrophoresis; 2020 Aug; 41(15):1344-1353. PubMed ID: 32453860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Separation of sperm and epithelial cells in a microfabricated device: potential application to forensic analysis of sexual assault evidence.
Horsman KM; Barker SL; Ferrance JP; Forrest KA; Koen KA; Landers JP
Anal Chem; 2005 Feb; 77(3):742-9. PubMed ID: 15679339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Validation of Differential Extraction Kit in forensic sexual assault cases].
Wu D; Cao Y; Xu Y; He BF; Bi G; Zhou HG
Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Dec; 25(6):440-2. PubMed ID: 20225622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison between MACSprep™ forensic sperm microbead kit and Erase Sperm Isolation kit for the enrichment of sperm fractions recovered from sexual assault samples.
Grosjean F; Favre M; Castella V
Int J Legal Med; 2023 Jan; 137(1):267-278. PubMed ID: 35773355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The problem of untested sexual assault kits: why are some kits never submitted to a crime laboratory?
Patterson D; Campbell R
J Interpers Violence; 2012 Jul; 27(11):2259-75. PubMed ID: 22258072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Acoustic differential extraction for forensic analysis of sexual assault evidence.
Norris JV; Evander M; Horsman-Hall KM; Nilsson J; Laurell T; Landers JP
Anal Chem; 2009 Aug; 81(15):6089-95. PubMed ID: 19591449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Filtration based DNA preparation for sexual assault cases.
Garvin AM
J Forensic Sci; 2003 Sep; 48(5):1084-7. PubMed ID: 14535671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A retrospective study on the transfer, persistence and recovery of sperm and epithelial cells in samples collected in sexual assault casework.
Fonneløp AE; Johannessen H; Heen G; Molland K; Gill P
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Nov; 43():102153. PubMed ID: 31505370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Inferring the presence of spermatozoa in forensic samples based on male DNA fractionation following differential extraction.
Alderson G; Gurevitch H; Casimiro T; Reid B; Millman J
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Sep; 36():225-232. PubMed ID: 30077873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sperm cell purification from mock forensic swabs using SOMAmer™ affinity reagents.
Katilius E; Carmel AB; Koss H; O'Connell D; Smith BC; Sanders GM; LaBerge GS
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Jul; 35():9-13. PubMed ID: 29609058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The optimal timing of forensic evidence collection following paediatric sexual assault.
Wood GJ; Smith JAS; Gall JA
J Forensic Leg Med; 2023 Apr; 95():102499. PubMed ID: 36889049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Isolating Sperm from Cell Mixtures Using Magnetic Beads Coupled with an Anti-PH-20 Antibody for Forensic DNA Analysis.
Zhao XC; Wang L; Sun J; Jiang BW; Zhang EL; Ye J
PLoS One; 2016; 11(7):e0159401. PubMed ID: 27442128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Developmental validation of an efficient differential separation method incorporating the i-sep
White TJ; Rye MS; Tay JW
J Forensic Sci; 2022 Jul; 67(4):1679-1689. PubMed ID: 35373351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A physical method for separating spermatozoa from epithelial cells in sexual assault evidence.
Chen J; Kobilinsky L; Wolosin D; Shaler R; Baum H
J Forensic Sci; 1998 Jan; 43(1):114-8. PubMed ID: 9456531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A proof of principal study on the use of direct PCR of semen and spermatozoa and development of a differential isolation protocol for use in cases of alleged sexual assault.
Tobe SS; Swaran YC; Dennany L; Sibbing U; Schulze Johann K; Welch L; Vennemann M
Int J Legal Med; 2017 Jan; 131(1):87-94. PubMed ID: 27832353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Application of hematoxylin reagent for sperm cell separation in sexual crime evidence.
Kim JY; Kim MI; Lee HH; Kim HL; Lee EJ; Lee YH; Hwang IK; Chun BW; Kang PW
Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Feb; 307():110114. PubMed ID: 31901461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Automation of the standard DNA differential extraction on the Hamilton AutoLys STAR system: A proof-of-concept study.
Timken MD; Klein SB; Kubala S; Scharnhorst G; Buoncristiani MR; Miller KWP
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 May; 40():96-104. PubMed ID: 30785062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Identification of spermatozoa using a novel 3-plex MSRE-PCR assay for forensic examination of sexual assaults.
Liu KL; Tsai LC; Lin YC; Huang NE; Yang LJ; Su CW; Lee JC; Linacre A; Hsieh HM
Int J Legal Med; 2020 Nov; 134(6):1991-2004. PubMed ID: 32266534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Use of Laser Microdissection in Forensic Sexual Assault Casework: Pros and Cons Compared to Standard Methods.
Costa S; Correia-de-Sá P; Porto MJ; Cainé L
J Forensic Sci; 2017 Jul; 62(4):998-1006. PubMed ID: 28133731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Automatic detection of spermatozoa for laser capture microdissection.
Vandewoestyne M; Van Hoofstat D; Van Nieuwerburgh F; Deforce D
Int J Legal Med; 2009 Mar; 123(2):169-75. PubMed ID: 18661142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
