These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32454956)

  • 1. Effect of multiple pouring on the accuracy of casts made using 3D-printed custom trays with different spacer thicknesses: A research study.
    Tavakolizadeh S; Razaghi MJ; Pakravan P; Sedaghat Monfared M; Beyabanaki E; Ghoveizi R
    J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects; 2020; 14(1):37-40. PubMed ID: 32454956
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of tray space and repeat pours on the accuracy of monophasic polyvinylsiloxane impression.
    Rajapur A; Dixit S; Hoshing C; Raikar SP
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Nov; 13(6):824-9. PubMed ID: 23404010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy and feasibility of 3D-printed custom open trays for impressions of multiple implants: A self-controlled clinical trial.
    Yang X; Liu Y; Li Y; Zhao Y; Di P
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Sep; 128(3):396-403. PubMed ID: 33593675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of tray selection, viscosity of impression material, and sequence of pour on the accuracy of dies made from dual-arch impressions.
    Ceyhan JA; Johnson GH; Lepe X
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Aug; 90(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 12886207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The influence of undercut depths on the accuracy of casts poured from irreversible hydrocolloid impression materials.
    Mudliar VL; Li KC; van Vuuren LJ; Waddell JN
    Heliyon; 2020 Jan; 6(1):e03143. PubMed ID: 31970297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparative evaluation of tray spacer thickness and repeat pour on the accuracy of monophasic polyvinyl siloxane impression material: in vitro study.
    Kumar S; Yadav D; Yadav R; Arora A
    Indian J Dent Res; 2014; 25(2):184-7. PubMed ID: 24992848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluating the Effect of Different Impression Techniques and Splinting Methods on the Dimensional Accuracy of Multiple Implant Impressions: An in vitro Study.
    Saini HS; Jain S; Kumar S; Aggarwal R; Choudhary S; Reddy NK
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Aug; 19(8):1005-1012. PubMed ID: 30150505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Computer aided design and 3-dimensional printing for the production of custom trays of maxillary edentulous jaws based on 3-dimensional scan of primary impression].
    Chen H; Zhao T; Wang Y; Sun YC
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2016 Oct; 48(5):900-904. PubMed ID: 27752178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: influence of tray material, impression material, and time.
    Thongthammachat S; Moore BK; Barco MT; Hovijitra S; Brown DT; Andres CJ
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun; 11(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 12087547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Design parameters of polylactic acid custom trays manufactured by fused deposition modeling for partial edentulism: Consideration of the accuracy of the definitive cast.
    Li H; Ma K; Sun Y; Chen H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Feb; 127(2):288.e1-288.e11. PubMed ID: 34924189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical evaluation of final impressions from three-dimensional printed custom trays.
    Sun Y; Chen H; Li H; Deng K; Zhao T; Wang Y; Zhou Y
    Sci Rep; 2017 Nov; 7(1):14958. PubMed ID: 29097699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dimensional Stability and Retention Strength of Impressions to Custom Impression Trays Fabricated Using Conventional Method and Additive Technology - An In-vitro Study.
    Priyadarshini KS; Nandini VV; Marimuthu R; Lathief J
    Indian J Dent Res; 2023 Oct; 34(4):427-432. PubMed ID: 38739826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effects of custom tray material on the accuracy of master casts.
    Shafa S; Zaree Z; Mosharraf R
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Sep; 9(6):49-56. PubMed ID: 18784859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical evaluation of tissue stops on 3D-printed custom trays.
    Deng K; Chen H; Li R; Li L; Wang Y; Zhou Y; Sun Y
    Sci Rep; 2019 Feb; 9(1):1807. PubMed ID: 30755638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of impression tray design upon the accuracy of stone casts produced from a single-phase medium-bodied polyvinyl siloxane impression material.
    Saunders WP; Sharkey SW; Smith GM; Taylor WG
    J Dent; 1992 Jun; 20(3):189-92. PubMed ID: 1624625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Evaluation of production and clinical working time of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) custom trays for complete denture].
    Wei L; Chen H; Zhou YS; Sun YC; Pan SX
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2017 Feb; 49(1):86-91. PubMed ID: 28203010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A clinical study comparing the three-dimensional accuracy of a working die generated from two dual-arch trays and a complete-arch custom tray.
    Ceyhan JA; Johnson GH; Lepe X; Phillips KM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Sep; 90(3):228-34. PubMed ID: 12942055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative evaluation of dimensional accuracy of different polyvinyl siloxane putty-wash impression techniques-in vitro study.
    Dugal R; Railkar B; Musani S
    J Int Oral Health; 2013 Oct; 5(5):85-94. PubMed ID: 24324310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Application of FDM three-dimensional printing technology in the digital manufacture of custom edentulous mandible trays.
    Chen H; Yang X; Chen L; Wang Y; Sun Y
    Sci Rep; 2016 Jan; 6():19207. PubMed ID: 26763620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantitative analysis of the selective pressure impression technique using CAD-CAM technology: A pilot clinical study.
    Stein BE; Yoon HI; Mattie H; Lee SJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Dec; 128(6):1289-1294. PubMed ID: 33992466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.