333 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32458272)
1. LI-RADS to categorize liver nodules in patients at risk of HCC: tool or a gadget in daily practice?
Barabino M; Gurgitano M; Fochesato C; Angileri SA; Franceschelli G; Santambrogio R; Mariani NM; Opocher E; Carrafiello G
Radiol Med; 2021 Jan; 126(1):5-13. PubMed ID: 32458272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Contrast ultrasound LI-RADS LR-5 identifies hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis in a multicenter restropective study of 1,006 nodules.
Terzi E; Iavarone M; Pompili M; Veronese L; Cabibbo G; Fraquelli M; Riccardi L; De Bonis L; Sangiovanni A; Leoni S; Zocco MA; Rossi S; Alessi N; Wilson SR; Piscaglia F;
J Hepatol; 2018 Mar; 68(3):485-492. PubMed ID: 29133247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for the differential diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: ESCULAP versus CEUS-LI-RADS.
Schellhaas B; Görtz RS; Pfeifer L; Kielisch C; Neurath MF; Strobel D
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2017 Sep; 29(9):1036-1044. PubMed ID: 28562394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Hepatocellular carcinoma: Can LI-RADS v2017 with gadoxetic-acid enhancement magnetic resonance and diffusion-weighted imaging improve diagnostic accuracy?
Zhang T; Huang ZX; Wei Y; Jiang HY; Chen J; Liu XJ; Cao LK; Duan T; He XP; Xia CC; Song B
World J Gastroenterol; 2019 Feb; 25(5):622-631. PubMed ID: 30774276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) versus non-HCC: accuracy and reliability of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System v2018.
Ludwig DR; Fraum TJ; Cannella R; Ballard DH; Tsai R; Naeem M; LeBlanc M; Salter A; Tsung A; Shetty AS; Borhani AA; Furlan A; Fowler KJ
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Jun; 44(6):2116-2132. PubMed ID: 30798397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Does quantitative assessment of arterial phase hyperenhancement and washout improve LI-RADS v2018-based classification of liver lesions?
Stocker D; Becker AS; Barth BK; Skawran S; Kaniewska M; Fischer MA; Donati O; Reiner CS
Eur Radiol; 2020 May; 30(5):2922-2933. PubMed ID: 32020398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic performance of MR for hepatocellular carcinoma based on LI-RADS v2018, compared with v2017.
Ren AH; Zhao PF; Yang DW; Du JB; Wang ZC; Yang ZH
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Sep; 50(3):746-755. PubMed ID: 30648327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Critical analysis of major and ancillary features of LI-RADS v2018 in the differentiation of small (≤ 2 cm) hepatocellular carcinoma from dysplastic nodules with gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.
De Gaetano AM; Catalano M; Pompili M; Marini MG; Rodríguez Carnero P; Gullì C; Infante A; Iezzi R; Ponziani FR; Cerrito L; Marrone G; Giuliante F; Ardito F; Rapaccini GL; Vecchio FM; Giraldi L; Manfredi R;
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2019 Sep; 23(18):7786-7801. PubMed ID: 31599447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnostic efficacy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound versus MRI Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) for categorising hepatic observations in patients at risk of hepatocellular carcinoma.
Li S; Zhou L; Chen R; Chen Y; Niu Z; Qian L; Fang Y; Xu L; Xu H; Zhang L
Clin Radiol; 2021 Feb; 76(2):161.e1-161.e10. PubMed ID: 33198943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound LI-RADS 2017: comparison with CT/MRI LI-RADS.
Ding J; Long L; Zhang X; Chen C; Zhou H; Zhou Y; Wang Y; Jing X; Ye Z; Wang F
Eur Radiol; 2021 Feb; 31(2):847-854. PubMed ID: 32803416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnostic Accuracy of CEUS LI-RADS for the Characterization of Liver Nodules 20 mm or Smaller in Patients at Risk for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Huang JY; Li JW; Lu Q; Luo Y; Lin L; Shi YJ; Li T; Liu JB; Lyshchik A
Radiology; 2020 Feb; 294(2):329-339. PubMed ID: 31793849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. LI-RADS-CEUS - Proposal for a Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Algorithm for the Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in High-Risk Populations.
Schellhaas B; Wildner D; Pfeifer L; Goertz RS; Hagel A; Neurath MF; Strobel D
Ultraschall Med; 2016 Dec; 37(6):627-634. PubMed ID: 27486793
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of treatment response in hepatocellular carcinoma in the explanted liver with Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2017.
Seo N; Kim MS; Park MS; Choi JY; Do RKG; Han K; Kim MJ
Eur Radiol; 2020 Jan; 30(1):261-271. PubMed ID: 31418085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System:: Substantial Discordance Between CT and MR for Imaging Classification of Hepatic Nodules.
Zhang YD; Zhu FP; Xu X; Wang Q; Wu CJ; Liu XS; Shi HB
Acad Radiol; 2016 Mar; 23(3):344-52. PubMed ID: 26777590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of primary liver carcinomas other than hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with LI-RADS v2018: comparison of the LI-RADS target population to patients without LI-RADS-defined HCC risk factors.
Fraum TJ; Cannella R; Ludwig DR; Tsai R; Naeem M; LeBlanc M; Salter A; Tsung A; Shetty AS; Borhani AA; Furlan A; Fowler KJ
Eur Radiol; 2020 Feb; 30(2):996-1007. PubMed ID: 31654212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Interobserver and intermodality agreement of standardized algorithms for non-invasive diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in high-risk patients: CEUS-LI-RADS versus MRI-LI-RADS.
Schellhaas B; Hammon M; Strobel D; Pfeifer L; Kielisch C; Goertz RS; Cavallaro A; Janka R; Neurath MF; Uder M; Seuss H
Eur Radiol; 2018 Oct; 28(10):4254-4264. PubMed ID: 29675659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. LI-RADS M (LR-M) criteria and reporting algorithm of v2018: diagnostic values in the assessment of primary liver cancers on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI.
Kim MY; Joo I; Kang HJ; Bae JS; Jeon SK; Lee JM
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2020 Aug; 45(8):2440-2448. PubMed ID: 32382817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. LI-RADS major features: CT, MRI with extracellular agents, and MRI with hepatobiliary agents.
Santillan C; Fowler K; Kono Y; Chernyak V
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2018 Jan; 43(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 28828680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diagnostic Performance of LI-RADS Version 2018, LI-RADS Version 2017, and OPTN Criteria for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Kierans AS; Song C; Gavlin A; Roudenko A; Lu L; Askin G; Hecht EM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Nov; 215(5):1085-1092. PubMed ID: 32877248
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Differentiation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma from Other Hepatic Malignancies in Patients at Risk: Diagnostic Performance of the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2014.
Fraum TJ; Tsai R; Rohe E; Ludwig DR; Salter A; Nalbantoglu I; Heiken JP; Fowler KJ
Radiology; 2018 Jan; 286(1):158-172. PubMed ID: 28853673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
