These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32459139)

  • 1. Effects of Self-Generated Noise on Quiet Threshold by Transducer Type in School-Age Children and Adults.
    Porter HL; Leibold LJ; Buss E
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Jun; 63(6):2027-2033. PubMed ID: 32459139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of Self-Generated Noise on Estimates of Detection Threshold in Quiet for School-Age Children and Adults.
    Buss E; Porter HL; Leibold LJ; Grose JH; Hall JW
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(6):650-659. PubMed ID: 27438873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Relationship between transducer type and low-frequency hearing loss for patients with ventilation tubes.
    Tokar-Prejna S; Meinzen-Derr J
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2006 Jun; 70(6):1063-7. PubMed ID: 16364457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pure-Tone Audiometry With Forward Pressure Level Calibration Leads to Clinically-Relevant Improvements in Test-Retest Reliability.
    Lapsley Miller JA; Reed CM; Robinson SR; Perez ZD
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(5):946-957. PubMed ID: 29470259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Supra-aural transducer-related artifact contributes to overestimation of noise-induced hearing loss.
    Bhatt IS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Apr; 143(4):2055. PubMed ID: 29716271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of the type of transducer in profound hearing loss.
    Marangoni AT; Gil D
    Pro Fono; 2009; 21(3):195-200. PubMed ID: 19838564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ambient Noise Monitoring during Pure-Tone Audiometry.
    Margolis RH; Saly GL; Wilson RH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2022 Jan; 33(1):45-56. PubMed ID: 35817024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hearing screening for school children: utility of noise-cancelling headphones.
    Lo AH; McPherson B
    BMC Ear Nose Throat Disord; 2013 May; 13(1):6. PubMed ID: 23705872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical applicability of insert earphones for audiometry.
    Borton TE; Nolen BL; Luks SB; Meline NC
    Audiology; 1989; 28(2):61-70. PubMed ID: 2930364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A version of the TEN Test for use with ER-3A insert earphones.
    Moore BC; Creeke S; Glasberg BR; Stone MA; Sek A
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(4):554-7. PubMed ID: 22436409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hearing thresholds for speech using insert earphones versus supra-aural earphones.
    Arlinger SD; Billermark E
    Scand Audiol; 1997; 26(3):151-4. PubMed ID: 9309810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How does the sound pressure generated by circumaural, supra-aural, and insert earphones differ for adult and infant ears?
    Voss SE; Herrmann BS
    Ear Hear; 2005 Dec; 26(6):636-50. PubMed ID: 16377999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical experience with the words-in-noise test on 3430 veterans: comparisons with pure-tone thresholds and word recognition in quiet.
    Wilson RH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011; 22(7):405-23. PubMed ID: 21993048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Functional hearing in noise: insert earphones vs. supra-aural headphones.
    Ribera JE
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2007 Dec; 78(12):1159-61. PubMed ID: 18064922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Maturation of the occlusion effect: a bone conduction auditory steady state response study in infants and adults with normal hearing.
    Small SA; Hu N
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(6):708-19. PubMed ID: 21617531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy of Smartphone Self-Hearing Test Applications Across Frequencies and Earphone Styles in Adults.
    Barczik J; Serpanos YC
    Am J Audiol; 2018 Dec; 27(4):570-580. PubMed ID: 30242342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Impact of Transducer Selection on the Acceptable Noise Level.
    Gordon-Hickey S; Bryan MF; Davis S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2022 Jan; 33(1):23-28. PubMed ID: 35577056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Test-retest reliability of pure-tone thresholds from 0.5 to 16 kHz using Sennheiser HDA 200 and Etymotic Research ER-2 earphones.
    Schmuziger N; Probst R; Smurzynski J
    Ear Hear; 2004 Apr; 25(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 15064657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of the transducers on paediatric thresholds estimated with auditory steady-state responses.
    Bakhos D; Vitaux H; Villeneuve A; Kim S; Lescanne E; Pigeon V; Aoustin JM; Bordure P; Galvin J
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Aug; 273(8):2019-26. PubMed ID: 26329899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Stimulus and transducer effects on threshold.
    Flamme GA; Geda K; McGregor KD; Wyllys K; Deiters KK; Murphy WJ; Stephenson MR
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Feb; 54 Suppl 1(0 1):S19-29. PubMed ID: 25549164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.