These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

318 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32459455)

  • 1. Efficacy and safety of various surgical treatments for proximal ureteral stone ≥10mm: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.
    Wang Y; Chang X; Li J; Han Z
    Int Braz J Urol; 2020; 46(6):902-926. PubMed ID: 32459455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy versus ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy for large proximal ureteral stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Li J; Chang X; Wang Y; Han Z
    Minerva Urol Nefrol; 2020 Feb; 72(1):30-37. PubMed ID: 31692305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optimal management of large proximal ureteral stones (>10 mm): A systematic review and meta-analysis of 12 randomized controlled trials.
    Lai S; Jiao B; Diao T; Seery S; Hu M; Wang M; Hou H; Wang J; Zhang G; Liu M
    Int J Surg; 2020 Aug; 80():205-217. PubMed ID: 32622059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of percutaneous nephrolithotomy and ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the management of impacted, large, proximal ureteral stones.
    Juan YS; Shen JT; Li CC; Wang CJ; Chuang SM; Huang CH; Wu WJ
    Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2008 Apr; 24(4):204-9. PubMed ID: 18424357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for large proximal ureteral stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Chang X; Yang Z; Wang X; Wang H; Wang Y; Han Z
    Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne; 2023 Mar; 18(1):42-51. PubMed ID: 37064569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Meta-analysis of Optimal Management of Lower Pole Stone of 10 - 20 mm: Flexible Ureteroscopy (FURS) versus Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL) versus Percutaneus Nephrolithotomy (PCNL).
    Yuri P; Hariwibowo R; Soeroharjo I; Danarto R; Hendri AZ; Brodjonegoro SR; Rasyid N; Birowo P; Widyahening IS
    Acta Med Indones; 2018 Jan; 50(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 29686172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy versus Laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy or Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the Management of Large Proximal Ureteral Stones: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Wu T; Duan X; Chen S; Yang X; Tang T; Cui S
    Urol Int; 2017; 99(3):308-319. PubMed ID: 28586770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of the Efficacy of Different Surgical Approaches for Complicated Impacted Proximal Ureteral Calculi Based on a New Scoring Standard: A Matched-Pair Analysis.
    Zhang L; Fei X; Jiang Z; Song Y
    J Endourol; 2023 Apr; 37(4):462-466. PubMed ID: 36541344
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the treatment of upper urinary tract stones: a meta-analysis comparing clinical efficacy and safety.
    Chen Y; Wen Y; Yu Q; Duan X; Wu W; Zeng G
    BMC Urol; 2020 Jul; 20(1):109. PubMed ID: 32711510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison between extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopic lithotripsy for treating large proximal ureteral stones: a meta-analysis.
    Cui X; Ji F; Yan H; Ou TW; Jia CS; He XZ; Gao W; Wang Q; Cui B; Wu JT
    Urology; 2015 Apr; 85(4):748-56. PubMed ID: 25681251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of URSL, RPLU, and MPCNL for treatment of large upper impacted ureteral stones: a randomized controlled trial.
    Wang Y; Zhong B; Yang X; Wang G; Hou P; Meng J
    BMC Urol; 2017 Jun; 17(1):50. PubMed ID: 28662708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical efficacy, safety, and costs of percutaneous occlusive balloon catheter-assisted ureteroscopic lithotripsy for large impacted proximal ureteral calculi: a prospective, randomized study.
    Qi S; Li Y; Liu X; Zhang C; Zhang H; Zhang Z; Xu Y
    J Endourol; 2014 Sep; 28(9):1064-70. PubMed ID: 24786613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery vs. Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy vs. Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Lower Pole Renal Stones 10-20 mm : A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review.
    Junbo L; Yugen L; Guo J; Jing H; Ruichao Y; Tao W
    Urol J; 2019 May; 16(2):97-106. PubMed ID: 30604405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cost-effectiveness of treating ureteral stones in a Taipei City Hospital: shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy plus lithoclast.
    Huang CY; Chen SS; Chen LK
    Urol Int; 2009; 83(4):410-5. PubMed ID: 19996647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Emergent versus delayed lithotripsy for obstructing ureteral stones: a cumulative analysis of comparative studies.
    Arcaniolo D; De Sio M; Rassweiler J; Nicholas J; Lima E; Carrieri G; Liatsikos E; Mirone V; Monga M; Autorino R
    Urolithiasis; 2017 Dec; 45(6):563-572. PubMed ID: 28233025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Semi-rigid ureteroscopic lithotripsy versus laparoscopic ureterolithotomy for large upper ureteral stones: a meta - analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Torricelli FC; Monga M; Marchini GS; Srougi M; Nahas WC; Mazzucchi E
    Int Braz J Urol; 2016; 42(4):645-54. PubMed ID: 27564273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of the Efficacy and Complications of Soft Ureteroscopy Lithotripsy and Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the Treatment of Urinary Calculi: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Han W; Ge J; Xu X
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2022; 2022():5829205. PubMed ID: 35813431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Efficacy and safety of the surgical treatments for lower calyceal stones: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
    Hou J; Xu F; Du H; Liu J; Li N
    Int J Surg; 2023 Mar; 109(3):383-388. PubMed ID: 36906759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison between extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and semirigid ureterorenoscope with holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy for treating large proximal ureteral stones.
    Wu CF; Shee JJ; Lin WY; Lin CL; Chen CS
    J Urol; 2004 Nov; 172(5 Pt 1):1899-902. PubMed ID: 15540749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ten-year experience in the management of distal ureteral stones greater than 10 mm in size.
    Dell'Atti L; Papa S
    G Chir; 2016; 37(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 27142822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.