These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32459806)

  • 1. Reproducibility of individual effect sizes in meta-analyses in psychology.
    Maassen E; van Assen MALM; Nuijten MB; Olsson-Collentine A; Wicherts JM
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(5):e0233107. PubMed ID: 32459806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A meta-review of transparency and reproducibility-related reporting practices in published meta-analyses on clinical psychological interventions (2000-2020).
    López-Nicolás R; López-López JA; Rubio-Aparicio M; Sánchez-Meca J
    Behav Res Methods; 2022 Feb; 54(1):334-349. PubMed ID: 34173943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On the reproducibility of meta-analyses: six practical recommendations.
    Lakens D; Hilgard J; Staaks J
    BMC Psychol; 2016 May; 4(1):24. PubMed ID: 27241618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Response to letter to the editor from Dr Rahman Shiri: The challenging topic of suicide across occupational groups.
    Niedhammer I; Milner A; Witt K; Klingelschmidt J; Khireddine-Medouni I; Alexopoulos EC; Toivanen S; Chastang JF; LaMontagne AD
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 2018 Jan; 44(1):108-110. PubMed ID: 29218357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Transparency and Reproducibility of Meta-Analyses in Psychology: A Meta-Review.
    Polanin JR; Hennessy EA; Tsuji S
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2020 Jul; 15(4):1026-1041. PubMed ID: 32516081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Statistical analyses for studying replication: Meta-analytic perspectives.
    Hedges LV; Schauer JM
    Psychol Methods; 2019 Oct; 24(5):557-570. PubMed ID: 30070547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fixed- versus random-effects models in meta-analysis: model properties and an empirical comparison of differences in results.
    Schmidt FL; Oh IS; Hayes TL
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 Feb; 62(Pt 1):97-128. PubMed ID: 18001516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Meta-analytic interval estimation for bivariate correlations.
    Bonett DG
    Psychol Methods; 2008 Sep; 13(3):173-81. PubMed ID: 18778150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparing meta-analyses and preregistered multiple-laboratory replication projects.
    Kvarven A; Strømland E; Johannesson M
    Nat Hum Behav; 2020 Apr; 4(4):423-434. PubMed ID: 31873200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The unappreciated heterogeneity of effect sizes: Implications for power, precision, planning of research, and replication.
    Kenny DA; Judd CM
    Psychol Methods; 2019 Oct; 24(5):578-589. PubMed ID: 30742474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Analyzing matrices of meta-analytic correlations: current practices and recommendations.
    Sheng Z; Kong W; Cortina JM; Hou S
    Res Synth Methods; 2016 Jun; 7(2):187-208. PubMed ID: 27286903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. "statcheck": Automatically detect statistical reporting inconsistencies to increase reproducibility of meta-analyses.
    Nuijten MB; Polanin JR
    Res Synth Methods; 2020 Sep; 11(5):574-579. PubMed ID: 32275351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. When averaging goes wrong: The case for mixture model estimation in psychological science.
    Moreau D; Corballis MC
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 Sep; 148(9):1615-1627. PubMed ID: 30489120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Estimating the Prevalence of Transparency and Reproducibility-Related Research Practices in Psychology (2014-2017).
    Hardwicke TE; Thibault RT; Kosie JE; Wallach JD; Kidwell MC; Ioannidis JPA
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2022 Jan; 17(1):239-251. PubMed ID: 33682488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Meta-analytic interval estimation for standardized and unstandardized mean differences.
    Bonett DG
    Psychol Methods; 2009 Sep; 14(3):225-38. PubMed ID: 19719359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The orchard plot: Cultivating a forest plot for use in ecology, evolution, and beyond.
    Nakagawa S; Lagisz M; O'Dea RE; Rutkowska J; Yang Y; Noble DWA; Senior AM
    Res Synth Methods; 2021 Jan; 12(1):4-12. PubMed ID: 32445243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessing heterogeneity and power in replications of psychological experiments.
    Schauer JM; Hedges LV
    Psychol Bull; 2020 Aug; 146(8):701-719. PubMed ID: 32271029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Times are changing, bias isn't: A meta-meta-analysis on publication bias detection practices, prevalence rates, and predictors in industrial/organizational psychology.
    Siegel M; Eder JSN; Wicherts JM; Pietschnig J
    J Appl Psychol; 2022 Nov; 107(11):2013-2039. PubMed ID: 34968082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Community-Augmented Meta-Analyses: Toward Cumulative Data Assessment.
    Tsuji S; Bergmann C; Cristia A
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2014 Nov; 9(6):661-5. PubMed ID: 26186116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.