246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32460439)
1. Edentulous mandible with four splinted interforaminal implants exposed to three different situations of trauma: A preliminary three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Krennmair S; Hunger S; Postl L; Winterhalder P; Holberg S; Malek M; Rudzki I; Holberg C
Dent Traumatol; 2020 Dec; 36(6):607-617. PubMed ID: 32460439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Effects of Frontal Trauma on 4 Interforaminal Dental Implants: A 3-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis Comparing Splinted and Unsplinted Implant Configurations.
Krennmair S; Winterhalder P; Hunger S; Rupperti S; Holberg C
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2020 Jun; 78(6):961-972. PubMed ID: 31951811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of frontal trauma on the edentulous mandible with four different interforaminal implant-prosthodontic anchoring configurations. A 3D finite element analysis.
Krennmair S; Malek M; Stehrer R; Stähler P; Otto S; Postl L
Eur J Med Res; 2023 Dec; 28(1):608. PubMed ID: 38115128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Finite-element analysis of 3 situations of trauma in the human edentulous mandible.
Santos LS; Rossi AC; Freire AR; Matoso RI; Caria PH; Prado FB
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Apr; 73(4):683-91. PubMed ID: 25577458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluating the biomechanical effects of implant diameter in case of facial trauma to an edentulous atrophic mandible: a 3D finite element analysis.
Ayali A; Bilginaylar K
Head Face Med; 2017 May; 13(1):5. PubMed ID: 28464946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Analysis of the effect of mesial implant position on surrounding bone stress of mandibular edentulous jaw under dynamic loads].
Li Y; Sun C; Jia H; Luo XJ
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Nov; 52(11):672-677. PubMed ID: 29972946
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of stress distribution in partially and completely edentulous mandibles around splinted and non-splinted implant prostheses: A finite element study.
Ozeki K; Nishio H
Biomed Mater Eng; 2020; 31(1):19-33. PubMed ID: 32083566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Tilted or parallel implant placement in the completely edentulous mandible? A three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Naini RB; Nokar S; Borghei H; Alikhasi M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):776-81. PubMed ID: 21841987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Three-dimensional finite element analysis of traumatic mechanism of mandibular symphyseal fracture combined with bilateral intracapsular condylar fractures].
Zhou W; An JG; Rong QG; Zhang Y
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2021 Oct; 53(5):983-989. PubMed ID: 34650306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Influence of the interforaminal arch form of edentulous mandibles on design of "All-on-4": preliminary research based on conebeam computed tomography].
Li SY; Li G; Feng HL; Pan SX
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2017 Aug; 49(4):699-703. PubMed ID: 28816291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of inter-implant distance and implant length on the response to frontal traumatic force of two anterior implants in an atrophic mandible: three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Kan B; Coskunses FM; Mutlu I; Ugur L; Meral DG
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Jul; 44(7):908-13. PubMed ID: 25818310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Anatomical landmarks of mandibular interforaminal region related to dental implant placement with 3D CBCT: comparison between edentulous and dental mandibles.
Sener E; Onem E; Akar GC; Govsa F; Ozer MA; Pinar Y; Mert A; Baksi Sen BG
Surg Radiol Anat; 2018 Jun; 40(6):615-623. PubMed ID: 29124343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A three-dimensional finite element study on two versus four implants in an edentulous mandible.
Meijer HJ; Starmans FJ; Steen WH; Bosman F
Int J Prosthodont; 1994; 7(3):271-9. PubMed ID: 7916894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of three finite element models of an edentulous mandible provided with implants.
Meijer HJ; Starmans FJ; Bosman F; Steen WH
J Oral Rehabil; 1993 Mar; 20(2):147-57. PubMed ID: 8468626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Stress and Strain Distribution Patterns in Bone around Splinted Standard and Short Implants Placed at the Crestal Level and Subcrestally using Three- Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
Amid R; Rasoolzadeh RA; Motlagh AM; Dehnavi F; Kadkhodazadeh M
J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2017; 27(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 29604944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biomechanical behavior of carbon fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone as a dental implant material in implant-supported overdenture under mandibular trauma: A finite element analysis study.
Bilginaylar K; Ayali A
Niger J Clin Pract; 2023 Oct; 26(10):1538-1546. PubMed ID: 37929532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bone strains around immediately loaded implants supporting mandibular overdentures in human cadavers.
Akça K; Akkocaoglu M; Cömert A; Tekdemir I; Cehreli MC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(1):101-9. PubMed ID: 17340903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Finite Element Analysis of Stress Distribution in Mandibles with Different Bone Types Loaded by Implant-Supported Overdentures with Different Localizations of Locator Attachments.
Yıldırım RS; Buyukerkmen EB
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2021; 36(5):851-862. PubMed ID: 34698710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A three-dimensional, finite-element analysis of bone around dental implants in an edentulous human mandible.
Meijer HJ; Starmans FJ; Steen WH; Bosman F
Arch Oral Biol; 1993 Jun; 38(6):491-6. PubMed ID: 8343071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical Comparison of Different Implant Inclinations and Cantilever Lengths in All-on-4 Treatment Concept by Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
Ozan O; Kurtulmus-Yilmaz S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(1):64-71. PubMed ID: 29340344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
