179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32462586)
1. Combining Targeted and Untargeted Data Acquisition to Enhance Quantitative Plant Proteomics Experiments.
Hart-Smith G
Methods Mol Biol; 2020; 2139():169-178. PubMed ID: 32462586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of data-dependent and -independent mass spectrometric workflows for sensitive quantification of proteins and phosphorylation sites.
Bauer M; Ahrné E; Baron AP; Glatter T; Fava LL; Santamaria A; Nigg EA; Schmidt A
J Proteome Res; 2014 Dec; 13(12):5973-88. PubMed ID: 25330945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Combining Metabolic ¹⁵N Labeling with Improved Tandem MOAC for Enhanced Probing of the Phosphoproteome.
Thomas M; Huck N; Hoehenwarter W; Conrath U; Beckers GJ
Methods Mol Biol; 2015; 1306():81-96. PubMed ID: 25930695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Hydroponic isotope labeling of entire plants and high-performance mass spectrometry for quantitative plant proteomics.
Bindschedler LV; Mills DJ; Cramer R
Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 893():155-73. PubMed ID: 22665301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. GlycoPep MassList: software to generate massive inclusion lists for glycopeptide analyses.
Hu W; Su X; Zhu Z; Go EP; Desaire H
Anal Bioanal Chem; 2017 Jan; 409(2):561-570. PubMed ID: 27614974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Inserting Pre-analytical Chromatographic Priming Runs Significantly Improves Targeted Pathway Proteomics with Sample Multiplexing.
Shuken SR; Yu Q; Gygi SP
J Proteome Res; 2024 May; 23(5):1834-1843. PubMed ID: 38594897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Multiplexed and data-independent tandem mass spectrometry for global proteome profiling.
Chapman JD; Goodlett DR; Masselon CD
Mass Spectrom Rev; 2014; 33(6):452-70. PubMed ID: 24281846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Hybrid data acquisition and processing strategies with increased throughput and selectivity: pSMART analysis for global qualitative and quantitative analysis.
Prakash A; Peterman S; Ahmad S; Sarracino D; Frewen B; Vogelsang M; Byram G; Krastins B; Vadali G; Lopez M
J Proteome Res; 2014 Dec; 13(12):5415-30. PubMed ID: 25244318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. MSAcquisitionSimulator: data-dependent acquisition simulator for LC-MS shotgun proteomics.
Goldfarb D; Wang W; Major MB
Bioinformatics; 2016 Apr; 32(8):1269-71. PubMed ID: 26685308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Processing strategies and software solutions for data-independent acquisition in mass spectrometry.
Bilbao A; Varesio E; Luban J; Strambio-De-Castillia C; Hopfgartner G; Müller M; Lisacek F
Proteomics; 2015 Mar; 15(5-6):964-80. PubMed ID: 25430050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry-based targeted proteomics and conventional analytical methods for the determination of P-glycoprotein in human breast cancer cells.
Yang T; Xu F; Xu J; Fang D; Yu Y; Chen Y
J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci; 2013 Oct; 936():18-24. PubMed ID: 23968647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Targeted proteomics analysis of protein degradation in plant signaling on an LTQ-Orbitrap mass spectrometer.
Majovsky P; Naumann C; Lee CW; Lassowskat I; Trujillo M; Dissmeyer N; Hoehenwarter W
J Proteome Res; 2014 Oct; 13(10):4246-58. PubMed ID: 25130057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Data processing has major impact on the outcome of quantitative label-free LC-MS analysis.
Chawade A; Sandin M; Teleman J; Malmström J; Levander F
J Proteome Res; 2015 Feb; 14(2):676-87. PubMed ID: 25407311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Optimization of Acquisition and Data-Processing Parameters for Improved Proteomic Quantification by Sequential Window Acquisition of All Theoretical Fragment Ion Mass Spectrometry.
Li S; Cao Q; Xiao W; Guo Y; Yang Y; Duan X; Shui W
J Proteome Res; 2017 Feb; 16(2):738-747. PubMed ID: 27995803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Whole cell, label free protein quantitation with data independent acquisition: quantitation at the MS2 level.
McQueen P; Spicer V; Schellenberg J; Krokhin O; Sparling R; Levin D; Wilkins JA
Proteomics; 2015 Jan; 15(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 25348682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Simultaneous quantification of protein phosphorylation sites using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry-based targeted proteomics: a linear algebra approach for isobaric phosphopeptides.
Xu F; Yang T; Sheng Y; Zhong T; Yang M; Chen Y
J Proteome Res; 2014 Dec; 13(12):5452-60. PubMed ID: 25403019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Label-Free Quantitative Proteomics in Yeast.
Léger T; Garcia C; Videlier M; Camadro JM
Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1361():289-307. PubMed ID: 26483028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mascot file parsing and quantification (MFPaQ), a new software to parse, validate, and quantify proteomics data generated by ICAT and SILAC mass spectrometric analyses: application to the proteomics study of membrane proteins from primary human endothelial cells.
Bouyssié D; Gonzalez de Peredo A; Mouton E; Albigot R; Roussel L; Ortega N; Cayrol C; Burlet-Schiltz O; Girard JP; Monsarrat B
Mol Cell Proteomics; 2007 Sep; 6(9):1621-37. PubMed ID: 17533220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. i-RUBY: a novel software for quantitative analysis of highly accurate shotgun-proteomics liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry data obtained without stable-isotope labeling of proteins.
Wada K; Ogiwara A; Nagasaka K; Tanaka N; Komatsu Y
Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom; 2011 Apr; 25(7):960-8. PubMed ID: 21416533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. iPhos: a toolkit to streamline the alkaline phosphatase-assisted comprehensive LC-MS phosphoproteome investigation.
Yang TH; Chang HT; Hsiao ES; Sun JL; Wang CC; Wu HY; Liao PC; Wu WS
BMC Bioinformatics; 2014; 15 Suppl 16(Suppl 16):S10. PubMed ID: 25521246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
