These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

254 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32463516)

  • 1. Readability Analysis of Online Headache and Migraine Information.
    Russo A; Lavorgna L; Silvestro M; Abbadessa G; Bisecco A; Trojsi F; Tessitore A; Tedeschi G; Bonavita S
    Headache; 2020 Jul; 60(7):1317-1324. PubMed ID: 32463516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The quality, understandability, readability, and popularity of online educational materials for heart murmur.
    Arslan D; Sami Tutar M; Kozanhan B; Bagci Z
    Cardiol Young; 2020 Mar; 30(3):328-336. PubMed ID: 31875800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Online Bruxism-related information: Can people understand what they read? A Cross-Sectional Study.
    Minervini G; Marrapodi MM; Cicciù M
    J Oral Rehabil; 2023 Nov; 50(11):1211-1216. PubMed ID: 37232129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessing the readability of online information about jones fracture.
    Al-Kharouf KFK; Khan FI; Robertson GA
    World J Methodol; 2023 Dec; 13(5):439-445. PubMed ID: 38229937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Readability analysis of online resources related to lung cancer.
    Weiss KD; Vargas CR; Ho OA; Chuang DJ; Weiss J; Lee BT
    J Surg Res; 2016 Nov; 206(1):90-97. PubMed ID: 27916381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Readability of web-based sources about induced abortion: a cross-sectional study.
    Georgsson S; Carlsson T
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2020 Jun; 20(1):102. PubMed ID: 32503524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An evaluation of the readability, quality, and accuracy of online health information regarding the treatment of hypospadias.
    Cisu TI; Mingin GC; Baskin LS
    J Pediatr Urol; 2019 Feb; 15(1):40.e1-40.e6. PubMed ID: 30449679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Critical Analysis of the Quality, Readability, and Technical Aspects of Online Information Provided for Neck-Lifts.
    Rayess H; Zuliani GF; Gupta A; Svider PF; Folbe AJ; Eloy JA; Carron MA
    JAMA Facial Plast Surg; 2017 Mar; 19(2):115-120. PubMed ID: 27812680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Systematic Assessment of Google Search Queries and Readability of Online Gynecologic Oncology Patient Education Materials.
    Martin A; Stewart JR; Gaskins J; Medlin E
    J Cancer Educ; 2019 Jun; 34(3):435-440. PubMed ID: 29353371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Readability of online health information pertaining to migraine and headache in the UK.
    Atherton K; Forshaw MJ; Kidd TM
    Br J Pain; 2023 Apr; 17(2):117-125. PubMed ID: 37057254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) procedure: an assessment of the quality and readability of online information.
    Lim SJM; Kelly M; Selvarajah L; Murray M; Scanlon T
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2021 May; 21(1):149. PubMed ID: 33952225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Readability of websites containing information on dental implants.
    Jayaratne YS; Anderson NK; Zwahlen RA
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Dec; 25(12):1319-24. PubMed ID: 24148074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessing the Accuracy and Readability of Online Health Information for Patients With Pancreatic Cancer.
    Storino A; Castillo-Angeles M; Watkins AA; Vargas C; Mancias JD; Bullock A; Demirjian A; Moser AJ; Kent TS
    JAMA Surg; 2016 Sep; 151(9):831-7. PubMed ID: 27144966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Examining the Reading Level of Internet Medical Information for Common Internal Medicine Diagnoses.
    Hutchinson N; Baird GL; Garg M
    Am J Med; 2016 Jun; 129(6):637-9. PubMed ID: 26829438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quality and readability of online information on ankylosing spondylitis.
    Kocyigit BF; Koca TT; Akaltun MS
    Clin Rheumatol; 2019 Nov; 38(11):3269-3274. PubMed ID: 31372852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An online readability analysis of pathology-related patient education articles: an opportunity for pathologists to educate patients.
    Prabhu AV; Kim C; Crihalmeanu T; Hansberry DR; Agarwal N; DeFrances MC; Trejo Bittar HE
    Hum Pathol; 2017 Jul; 65():15-20. PubMed ID: 28504209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quantitative readability analysis of websites providing information on traumatic brain injury and epilepsy: A need for clear communication.
    Correa DJ; Milano L; Kwon CS; Jetté N; Dlugos D; Harte-Hargrove L; Pugh MJ; Smith JK; Moshé SL
    Epilepsia; 2020 Mar; 61(3):528-538. PubMed ID: 32096225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How evidence-based is the information on the internet about nausea and vomiting of pregnancy?
    Sacks S; Abenhaim HA
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2013 Aug; 35(8):697-703. PubMed ID: 24007704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Readability of the Most Commonly Accessed Arthroscopy-Related Online Patient Education Materials.
    Akinleye SD; Krochak R; Richardson N; Garofolo G; Culbertson MD; Erez O
    Arthroscopy; 2018 Apr; 34(4):1272-1279. PubMed ID: 29287948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluating the Quality, Content, and Readability of Online Resources for Failed Back Spinal Surgery.
    Guo WJ; Wang WK; Xu D; Qiao Z; Shi YL; Luo P
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Apr; 44(7):494-502. PubMed ID: 30234809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.