These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32464082)

  • 1. Comparison of the Effects of Two Cochlear Implant Fine Structure Coding Strategies on Speech Perception.
    Müller V; Klünter HD; Fürstenberg D; Walger M; Lang-Roth R
    Am J Audiol; 2020 Jun; 29(2):226-235. PubMed ID: 32464082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. FS4, FS4-p, and FSP: a 4-month crossover study of 3 fine structure sound-coding strategies.
    Riss D; Hamzavi JS; Blineder M; Honeder C; Ehrenreich I; Kaider A; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(6):e272-81. PubMed ID: 25127325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Formant frequency discrimination with a fine structure sound coding strategy for cochlear implants.
    Liepins R; Kaider A; Honeder C; Auinger AB; Dahm V; Riss D; Arnoldner C
    Hear Res; 2020 Jul; 392():107970. PubMed ID: 32339775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Long-term improvement of speech perception with the fine structure processing coding strategy in cochlear implants.
    Kleine Punte A; De Bodt M; Van de Heyning P
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2014; 76(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 24685836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Examination of Prosody and Timbre Perception in Adults With Cochlear Implants Comparing Different Fine Structure Coding Strategies.
    Müller V; Klünter H; Fürstenberg D; Meister H; Walger M; Lang-Roth R
    Am J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 27(2):197-207. PubMed ID: 29536106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Speech and pitch perception with the new fine structure speech coding strategy].
    Gu P; Xi X; Han D; Hong M; Wang Q; Yang S; Dai P
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 May; 27(10):481-4. PubMed ID: 23937013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of continuous interleaved sampling and simultaneous analog stimulation speech processing strategies in newly implanted adults with a Clarion 1.2 cochlear implant.
    Zwolan TA; Kileny PR; Smith S; Waltzman S; Chute P; Domico E; Firszt J; Hodges A; Mills D; Whearty M; Osberger MJ; Fisher L
    Otol Neurotol; 2005 May; 26(3):455-65. PubMed ID: 15891649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Musical Sound Quality in Cochlear Implant Users: A Comparison in Bass Frequency Perception Between Fine Structure Processing and High-Definition Continuous Interleaved Sampling Strategies.
    Roy AT; Carver C; Jiradejvong P; Limb CJ
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(5):582-90. PubMed ID: 25906173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Effects of temporal fine structure stimulation on Mandarin identification in cochlear implant users].
    Qi B; Liu B; Dong R; Krenmayr A; Chen X; Wang S
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2014 Apr; 49(4):294-9. PubMed ID: 24931017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fine structure processing improves telephone speech perception in cochlear implant users.
    Galindo J; Lassaletta L; Mora RP; Castro A; Bastarrica M; Gavilán J
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 Mar; 270(4):1223-9. PubMed ID: 22766835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Nucleus 24 advanced encoder conversion study: performance versus preference.
    Skinner MW; Arndt PL; Staller SJ
    Ear Hear; 2002 Feb; 23(1 Suppl):2S-17S. PubMed ID: 11883765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Envelope versus fine structure speech coding strategy: a crossover study.
    Riss D; Hamzavi JS; Selberherr A; Kaider A; Blineder M; Starlinger V; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C
    Otol Neurotol; 2011 Sep; 32(7):1094-101. PubMed ID: 21817932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Enhanced hearing in noise for cochlear implant recipients: clinical trial results for a commercially available speech-enhancement strategy.
    Koch DB; Quick A; Osberger MJ; Saoji A; Litvak L
    Otol Neurotol; 2014 Jun; 35(5):803-9. PubMed ID: 24691504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of two cochlear implant coding strategies on speech perception.
    Dillon MT; Buss E; King ER; Deres EJ; Obarowski SN; Anderson ML; Adunka MC
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2016 Nov; 17(6):263-270. PubMed ID: 27750737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical Outcomes of the Cochlear™ Nucleus(®) 5 Cochlear Implant System and SmartSound™ 2 Signal Processing.
    Runge CL; Henion K; Tarima S; Beiter A; Zwolan TA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Jun; 27(6):425-440. PubMed ID: 27310402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Temporal Fine Structure Processing, Pitch, and Speech Perception in Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    Dincer D'Alessandro H; Ballantyne D; Boyle PJ; De Seta E; DeVincentiis M; Mancini P
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(4):679-686. PubMed ID: 29194080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of Stimulation Rate With the FS4 and HDCIS Coding Strategies in Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    Riss D; Hamzavi JS; Blineder M; Flak S; Baumgartner WD; Kaider A; Arnoldner C
    Otol Neurotol; 2016 Aug; 37(7):882-8. PubMed ID: 27295444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Everyday Listening Performance of Children Before and After Receiving a Second Cochlear Implant: Results Using the Parent Version of the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale.
    Galvin KL; Mok M
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(1):93-102. PubMed ID: 26418045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of different speech coding strategies using a disability-based inventory and speech perception tests in quiet and in noise.
    Beynon AJ; Snik AF; van den Broek P
    Otol Neurotol; 2003 May; 24(3):392-6. PubMed ID: 12806290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Speech understanding in quiet and in noise with the CIS speech coding strategy (MED-EL Combi-40) compared to the multipeak and spectral peak strategies (nucleus).
    Kiefer J; Müller J; Pfennigdorff T; Schön F; Helms J; von Ilberg C; Baumgartner W; Gstöttner W; Ehrenberger K; Arnold W; Stephan K; Thumfart W; Baur S
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 1996; 58(3):127-35. PubMed ID: 8797215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.