These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32466506)

  • 21. Decision and economic analysis of hostile abortion laws compared with supportive abortion laws.
    Nehme L; Ye P; Huang JC; Kawakita T
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2023 Aug; 5(8):101019. PubMed ID: 37178721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Roe v. Wade. Jane's perspective.
    Kaplan L
    Conscience; 1998; 18(4):27-8. PubMed ID: 12178883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. State actions on reproductive health issues in 1994.
    Sollom T
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1995; 27(2):83-7. PubMed ID: 7796902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. U.S. abortion policy since Roe v. Wade.
    Mcfarlane DR
    Am J Gynecol Health; 1993; 7(4):98-106. PubMed ID: 12288251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Perceived Access to Abortion Among Women in the United States in 2018: Variation by State Abortion Policy Context.
    Perreira KM; Johnston EM; Shartzer A; Yin S
    Am J Public Health; 2020 Jul; 110(7):1039-1045. PubMed ID: 32437276
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Contraceptive use following spontaneous and induced abortion and its association with family planning services in primary health care: results from a Brazilian longitudinal study.
    Borges AL; OlaOlorun F; Fujimori E; Hoga LA; Tsui AO
    Reprod Health; 2015 Oct; 12():94. PubMed ID: 26470703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Maintaining rigor in research: flaws in a recent study and a reanalysis of the relationship between state abortion laws and maternal mortality in Mexico.
    Darney BG; Saavedra-Avendano B; Lozano R
    Contraception; 2017 Jan; 95(1):105-111. PubMed ID: 27546094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Racial/ethnic and educational inequities in restrictive abortion policy variation and adverse birth outcomes in the United States.
    Redd SK; Rice WS; Aswani MS; Blake S; Julian Z; Sen B; Wingate M; Hall KS
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2021 Oct; 21(1):1139. PubMed ID: 34686197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The Status of Women's Reproductive Rights and Adverse Birth Outcomes.
    Wallace ME; Evans MG; Theall K
    Womens Health Issues; 2017; 27(2):121-128. PubMed ID: 28131388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The association between state-level abortion restrictions and maternal mortality in the United States, 1995-2017.
    Addante AN; Eisenberg DL; Valentine MC; Leonard J; Maddox KEJ; Hoofnagle MH
    Contraception; 2021 Nov; 104(5):496-501. PubMed ID: 33781761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. What happens to contraception when anti-abortion laws pass?
    Contracept Technol Update; 1991 Sep; 12(9):143-4. PubMed ID: 12317311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. State legislation on abortion after Roe v. Wade: selected constitutional issues.
    Bryant MD
    Am J Law Med; 1976; 2(1):101-32. PubMed ID: 973625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Government in the examining room: restrictions on the provision of abortion.
    Kolbert K; Miller A
    J Am Med Womens Assoc (1972); 1994; 49(5):153-5, 164. PubMed ID: 7806759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Maternal and infant predictors of infant mortality in California, 2007-2015.
    Ratnasiri AWG; Lakshminrusimha S; Dieckmann RA; Lee HC; Gould JB; Parry SS; Arief VN; DeLacy IH; DiLibero RJ; Basford KE
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(8):e0236877. PubMed ID: 32760136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Abortion on the Supreme Court agenda: Planned Parenthood v. Casey and its possible consequences.
    Koslov TI
    Law Med Health Care; 1992; 20(3):243-8. PubMed ID: 1434769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. State Abortion Policies and Maternal Death in the United States, 2015‒2018.
    Vilda D; Wallace ME; Daniel C; Evans MG; Stoecker C; Theall KP
    Am J Public Health; 2021 Sep; 111(9):1696-1704. PubMed ID: 34410825
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Association of Availability of State Medicaid Coverage for Abortion With Abortion Access in the United States.
    McDonnell J; Jarlenski M; Borrero S; Vinekar K
    Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Oct; 140(4):623-630. PubMed ID: 36075060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Planned Parenthood v Casey. The impact of the new undue burden standard on reproductive health care.
    Benshoof J
    JAMA; 1993 May; 269(17):2249-57. PubMed ID: 8474205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The legal status of abortion in the states if Roe v. Wade is overruled.
    Linton PB
    Issues Law Med; 2007; 23(1):3-43. PubMed ID: 17703698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The legal status of abortion in the States if Roe v. Wade is overruled.
    Linton PB
    Issues Law Med; 2012; 27(3):181-228. PubMed ID: 22696839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.