203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32466992)
1. The performance of the Elecsys® anti-Müllerian hormone assay in predicting extremes of ovarian response to corifollitropin alfa.
Neves AR; Blockeel C; Griesinger G; Garcia-Velasco JA; Marca A; Rodriguez I; Drakopoulos P; Alvarez M; Tournaye H; Polyzos NP
Reprod Biomed Online; 2020 Jul; 41(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 32466992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Predictors of ovarian response in women treated with corifollitropin alfa for in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection.
Polyzos NP; Tournaye H; Guzman L; Camus M; Nelson SM
Fertil Steril; 2013 Aug; 100(2):430-7. PubMed ID: 23668992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Performance of prognostic modelling of high and low ovarian response to ovarian stimulation for IVF.
Scheinhardt MO; Lerman T; König IR; Griesinger G
Hum Reprod; 2018 Aug; 33(8):1499-1505. PubMed ID: 30007353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ovarian response markers lead to appropriate and effective use of corifollitropin alpha in assisted reproduction.
La Marca A; D'Ippolito G
Reprod Biomed Online; 2014 Feb; 28(2):183-90. PubMed ID: 24368127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Predictive factors for ovarian response in a corifollitropin alfa/GnRH antagonist protocol for controlled ovarian stimulation in IVF/ICSI cycles.
Oehninger S; Nelson SM; Verweij P; Stegmann BJ
Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2015 Oct; 13():117. PubMed ID: 26520396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The addition of anti-Müllerian hormone in an algorithm for individualized hormone dosage did not improve the prediction of ovarian response-a randomized, controlled trial.
Magnusson Å; Nilsson L; Oleröd G; Thurin-Kjellberg A; Bergh C
Hum Reprod; 2017 Apr; 32(4):811-819. PubMed ID: 28175316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Predictive value of anti-müllerian hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone and antral follicle count on the outcome of ovarian stimulation in women following GnRH-antagonist protocol for IVF/ET.
Tsakos E; Tolikas A; Daniilidis A; Asimakopoulos B
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2014 Dec; 290(6):1249-53. PubMed ID: 25001569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A multicentre evaluation of the Elecsys
Jacobs MH; Reuter LM; Baker VL; Craig LB; Sakkas D; Surrey E; Doody KJ; Jungheim ES; Bayrak AB; Hund M; Verhagen-Kamerbeek WDJ; Pardue D; Buck K; Timm B
Reprod Biomed Online; 2019 May; 38(5):845-852. PubMed ID: 30930183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Circulating basal anti-Müllerian hormone levels as predictor of ovarian response in women undergoing ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization.
Nardo LG; Gelbaya TA; Wilkinson H; Roberts SA; Yates A; Pemberton P; Laing I
Fertil Steril; 2009 Nov; 92(5):1586-93. PubMed ID: 18930213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of the Elecsys
Anckaert E; Denk B; He Y; Torrance HL; Broekmans F; Hund M
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 May; 236():133-138. PubMed ID: 30909009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Corifollitropin alfa followed by highly purified HMG versus recombinant FSH in young poor ovarian responders: a multicentre randomized controlled clinical trial.
Drakopoulos P; Vuong TNL; Ho NAV; Vaiarelli A; Ho MT; Blockeel C; Camus M; Lam AT; van de Vijver A; Humaidan P; Tournaye H; Polyzos NP
Hum Reprod; 2017 Nov; 32(11):2225-2233. PubMed ID: 29040589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ovarian response to recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone: a randomized, antimüllerian hormone-stratified, dose-response trial in women undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection.
Arce JC; Andersen AN; Fernández-Sánchez M; Visnova H; Bosch E; García-Velasco JA; Barri P; de Sutter P; Klein BM; Fauser BC
Fertil Steril; 2014 Dec; 102(6):1633-40.e5. PubMed ID: 25256937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Corifollitropin alfa compared with follitropin beta in poor responders undergoing ICSI: a randomized controlled trial.
Kolibianakis EM; Venetis CA; Bosdou JK; Zepiridis L; Chatzimeletiou K; Makedos A; Masouridou S; Triantafillidis S; Mitsoli A; Tarlatzis BC
Hum Reprod; 2015 Feb; 30(2):432-40. PubMed ID: 25492411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of Ovarian Reserve Tests and Age in the Prediction of Poor Ovarian Response to Controlled Ovarian Stimulation-A Real-World Data Analysis of 89,002 Patients.
Wang X; Jin L; Mao YD; Shi JZ; Huang R; Jiang YN; Zhang CL; Liang XY
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2021; 12():702061. PubMed ID: 34526967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Anti-Müllerian hormone: correlation of early follicular, ovulatory and midluteal levels with ovarian response and cycle outcome in intracytoplasmic sperm injection patients.
Elgindy EA; El-Haieg DO; El-Sebaey A
Fertil Steril; 2008 Jun; 89(6):1670-6. PubMed ID: 17658520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical value of serum anti-mullerian hormone and inhibin B in prediction of ovarian response in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome.
Zhang F; Liu XL; Rong N; Huang XW
J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci; 2017 Feb; 37(1):70-73. PubMed ID: 28224431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Predictive values of anti-müllerian hormone, antral follicle count and ovarian response prediction index (ORPI) for assisted reproductive technology outcomes.
Ashrafi M; Hemat M; Arabipoor A; Salman Yazdi R; Bahman-Abadi A; Cheraghi R
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2017 Jan; 37(1):82-88. PubMed ID: 27976974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prediction of the lower serum anti-Müllerian hormone threshold for ovarian stimulation prior to in-vitro fertilization using the Elecsys® AMH assay: a prospective observational study.
Grynnerup AG; Løssl K; Pilsgaard F; Lunding SA; Storgaard M; Bogstad JW; Prætorius L; Zedeler A; Bungum L; Nyboe Andersen A; Pinborg A
Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2019 Jan; 17(1):11. PubMed ID: 30634990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Anti-Müllerian hormone versus antral follicle count for defining the starting dose of FSH.
Lan VT; Linh NK; Tuong HM; Wong PC; Howles CM
Reprod Biomed Online; 2013 Oct; 27(4):390-9. PubMed ID: 23953069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Predictive value of antral follicle count and serum anti-Müllerian hormone: Which is better for live birth prediction in patients aged over 40 with their first IVF treatment?
Lee Y; Kim TH; Park JK; Eum JH; Lee HJ; Kim J; Lyu SW; Kim YS; Lee WS; Yoon TK
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2018 Feb; 221():151-155. PubMed ID: 29306180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
