These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

815 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32467336)

  • 1. The upper limit of optimal tumor size in patients with FIGO 2018 stage IB2 cervical cancer undergoing radical hysterectomy.
    Hwang WY; Kim JH; Suh DH; Kim K; No JH; Kim YB
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Jul; 30(7):975-980. PubMed ID: 32467336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Long-term oncological outcomes after laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in stage I a2- II a2 cervical cancer: a matched cohort study].
    Wang W; Shang C; Huang J; Chen S; Shen H; Yao S
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Dec; 50(12):894-901. PubMed ID: 26887872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for stage IB2 cervical cancer.
    Havrilesky LJ; Leath CA; Huh W; Calingaert B; Bentley RC; Soper JT; Alvarez Secord A
    Gynecol Oncol; 2004 May; 93(2):429-34. PubMed ID: 15099957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Isolated para-aortic lymph node metastasis in FIGO stage IA2-IB2 carcinoma of the cervix: Revisiting the role of surgical assessment.
    Del Carmen MG; Pareja R; Melamed A; Rodriguez J; Greer A; Clark RM; Rice LW
    Gynecol Oncol; 2018 Sep; 150(3):406-411. PubMed ID: 30017539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Clinical analysis of 32 cases with neuroendocrine carcinoma of the uterine cervix in early-stage disease].
    Wang Z; Wu L; Yao H; Sun Y; Li X; Li B; Zhang R; Ma S; Huang M
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Mar; 50(3):198-203. PubMed ID: 26268410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of stages IB1 and IB2 cervical cancers treated with radical hysterectomy. Is size the real difference?
    Rutledge TL; Kamelle SA; Tillmanns TD; Gould NS; Wright JD; Cohn DE; Herzog TJ; Rader JS; Gold MA; Johnson GA; Walker JL; Mannel RS; McMeekin DS
    Gynecol Oncol; 2004 Oct; 95(1):70-6. PubMed ID: 15385112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Para-aortic lymph node involvement revisited in the light of the revised 2018 FIGO staging system for cervical cancer.
    Ayhan A; Aslan K; Öz M; Tohma YA; Kuşçu E; Meydanli MM
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2019 Sep; 300(3):675-682. PubMed ID: 31263988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of laparoscopic and open radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer patients with tumor size ≤2 cm.
    Chen X; Zhao N; Ye P; Chen J; Nan X; Zhao H; Zhou K; Zhang Y; Xue J; Zhou H; Shang H; Zhu H; Leanne VM; Yan X
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 May; 30(5):564-571. PubMed ID: 32276941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Radical hysterectomy followed by tailored postoperative therapy in the treatment of stage IB2 cervical cancer: feasibility and indications for adjuvant therapy.
    Yessaian A; Magistris A; Burger RA; Monk BJ
    Gynecol Oncol; 2004 Jul; 94(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 15262120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Open versus laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection in early stage cervical cancer: no difference in surgical or disease outcome.
    van de Lande J; von Mensdorff-Pouilly S; Lettinga RG; Piek JM; Verheijen RH
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2012 Jan; 22(1):107-14. PubMed ID: 21857347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Re-classification of uterine cervical cancer cases treated with radical hysterectomy based on the 2018 FIGO staging system.
    Osaku D; Komatsu H; Okawa M; Iida Y; Sato S; Oishi T; Harada T
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Nov; 60(6):1054-1058. PubMed ID: 34794737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Matched-case comparison for the role of surgery in FIGO stage Ib1-IIa squamous cell carcinoma of cervix and suspicious para-aortic lymph node metastasis.
    Kim HS; Park NH; Wu HG; Cho JY; Chung HH; Kim JW; Song YS; Kim SH; Kang SB
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2009 Jan; 16(1):133-9. PubMed ID: 18979134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prognostic factors in FIGO stage IB cervical cancer without lymph node metastasis and the role of adjuvant radiotherapy after radical hysterectomy.
    Ayhan A; Al RA; Baykal C; Demirtas E; Ayhan A; Yüce K
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2004; 14(2):286-92. PubMed ID: 15086728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Effects of pre-chemotherapy hemoglobin and platelet levels in patients with stage Ib2-IIb cervical cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical hysterectomy].
    Wang D; Wu M; Ren T; Wan XR; Feng FZ; Huang HF; Yang JX; Shen K; Xiang Y
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Aug; 47(8):577-81. PubMed ID: 23141176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Operable Stages IB and II cervical carcinomas: a retrospective study comparing preoperative uterovaginal brachytherapy and postoperative radiotherapy.
    Atlan D; Touboul E; Deniaud-Alexandre E; Lefranc JP; Antoine JM; Jannet D; Lhuillier P; Uzan M; Huart J; Genestie C; Antoine M; Jamali M; Ganansia V; Milliez J; Uzan S; Blondon J
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2002 Nov; 54(3):780-93. PubMed ID: 12377330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analysis of the effect of adjuvant radiotherapy on outcomes and complications after radical hysterectomy in FIGO stage IB1 cervical cancer patients with intermediate risk factors (GOTIC Study).
    Nakamura K; Kitahara Y; Satoh T; Takei Y; Takano M; Nagao S; Sekiguchi I; Suzuki M
    World J Surg Oncol; 2016 Jun; 14(1):173. PubMed ID: 27356862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Radical hysterectomy with adjuvant radiotherapy versus radical radiotherapy for FIGO stage IIB cervical cancer.
    Chai Y; Wang T; Wang J; Yang Y; Gao Y; Gao J; Gao S; Wang Y; Zhou X; Liu Z
    BMC Cancer; 2014 Feb; 14():63. PubMed ID: 24495453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Surgical pathologic factors in patients with early-stage cervical carcinoma treated with radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection: association with administration of adjuvant radiotherapy and effect on survival.
    Piura B; Rabinovich A; Friger M
    Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2006; 27(6):573-8. PubMed ID: 17290585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Radical hysterectomy with or without para-aortic lymphadenectomy for patients with stage IB2, IIA2, and IIB cervical cancer: outcomes for a series of 308 patients.
    Tsuruga T; Fujimoto A; Kawana K; Mori M; Hasumi Y; Kino N; Tomio K; Miura S; Tanikawa M; Sone K; Miyamoto Y; Ikeda Y; Kojima S; Adachi K; Nagasaka K; Matsumoto Y; Arimoto T; Oda K; Nakagawa S; Horie K; Yasugi T; Yokota H; Osuga Y; Fujii T
    Int J Clin Oncol; 2016 Apr; 21(2):359-366. PubMed ID: 26438230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Postoperative nomogram for the prediction of disease-free survival in lymph node-negative stage I-IIA cervical cancer patients treated with radical hysterectomy.
    Gülseren V; Kocaer M; Çakır İ; Özdemir İA; Sancı M; Güngördük K
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2020 Jul; 40(5):699-704. PubMed ID: 31607197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 41.