Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

801 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32467336)

  • 1. The upper limit of optimal tumor size in patients with FIGO 2018 stage IB2 cervical cancer undergoing radical hysterectomy.
    Hwang WY; Kim JH; Suh DH; Kim K; No JH; Kim YB
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Jul; 30(7):975-980. PubMed ID: 32467336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Long-term oncological outcomes after laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in stage I a2- II a2 cervical cancer: a matched cohort study].
    Wang W; Shang C; Huang J; Chen S; Shen H; Yao S
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Dec; 50(12):894-901. PubMed ID: 26887872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for stage IB2 cervical cancer.
    Havrilesky LJ; Leath CA; Huh W; Calingaert B; Bentley RC; Soper JT; Alvarez Secord A
    Gynecol Oncol; 2004 May; 93(2):429-34. PubMed ID: 15099957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Isolated para-aortic lymph node metastasis in FIGO stage IA2-IB2 carcinoma of the cervix: Revisiting the role of surgical assessment.
    Del Carmen MG; Pareja R; Melamed A; Rodriguez J; Greer A; Clark RM; Rice LW
    Gynecol Oncol; 2018 Sep; 150(3):406-411. PubMed ID: 30017539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Clinical analysis of 32 cases with neuroendocrine carcinoma of the uterine cervix in early-stage disease].
    Wang Z; Wu L; Yao H; Sun Y; Li X; Li B; Zhang R; Ma S; Huang M
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Mar; 50(3):198-203. PubMed ID: 26268410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of stages IB1 and IB2 cervical cancers treated with radical hysterectomy. Is size the real difference?
    Rutledge TL; Kamelle SA; Tillmanns TD; Gould NS; Wright JD; Cohn DE; Herzog TJ; Rader JS; Gold MA; Johnson GA; Walker JL; Mannel RS; McMeekin DS
    Gynecol Oncol; 2004 Oct; 95(1):70-6. PubMed ID: 15385112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Para-aortic lymph node involvement revisited in the light of the revised 2018 FIGO staging system for cervical cancer.
    Ayhan A; Aslan K; Öz M; Tohma YA; Kuşçu E; Meydanli MM
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2019 Sep; 300(3):675-682. PubMed ID: 31263988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of laparoscopic and open radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer patients with tumor size ≤2 cm.
    Chen X; Zhao N; Ye P; Chen J; Nan X; Zhao H; Zhou K; Zhang Y; Xue J; Zhou H; Shang H; Zhu H; Leanne VM; Yan X
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 May; 30(5):564-571. PubMed ID: 32276941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Radical hysterectomy followed by tailored postoperative therapy in the treatment of stage IB2 cervical cancer: feasibility and indications for adjuvant therapy.
    Yessaian A; Magistris A; Burger RA; Monk BJ
    Gynecol Oncol; 2004 Jul; 94(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 15262120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Open versus laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection in early stage cervical cancer: no difference in surgical or disease outcome.
    van de Lande J; von Mensdorff-Pouilly S; Lettinga RG; Piek JM; Verheijen RH
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2012 Jan; 22(1):107-14. PubMed ID: 21857347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Re-classification of uterine cervical cancer cases treated with radical hysterectomy based on the 2018 FIGO staging system.
    Osaku D; Komatsu H; Okawa M; Iida Y; Sato S; Oishi T; Harada T
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Nov; 60(6):1054-1058. PubMed ID: 34794737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Matched-case comparison for the role of surgery in FIGO stage Ib1-IIa squamous cell carcinoma of cervix and suspicious para-aortic lymph node metastasis.
    Kim HS; Park NH; Wu HG; Cho JY; Chung HH; Kim JW; Song YS; Kim SH; Kang SB
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2009 Jan; 16(1):133-9. PubMed ID: 18979134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prognostic factors in FIGO stage IB cervical cancer without lymph node metastasis and the role of adjuvant radiotherapy after radical hysterectomy.
    Ayhan A; Al RA; Baykal C; Demirtas E; Ayhan A; Yüce K
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2004; 14(2):286-92. PubMed ID: 15086728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Effects of pre-chemotherapy hemoglobin and platelet levels in patients with stage Ib2-IIb cervical cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical hysterectomy].
    Wang D; Wu M; Ren T; Wan XR; Feng FZ; Huang HF; Yang JX; Shen K; Xiang Y
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Aug; 47(8):577-81. PubMed ID: 23141176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Operable Stages IB and II cervical carcinomas: a retrospective study comparing preoperative uterovaginal brachytherapy and postoperative radiotherapy.
    Atlan D; Touboul E; Deniaud-Alexandre E; Lefranc JP; Antoine JM; Jannet D; Lhuillier P; Uzan M; Huart J; Genestie C; Antoine M; Jamali M; Ganansia V; Milliez J; Uzan S; Blondon J
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2002 Nov; 54(3):780-93. PubMed ID: 12377330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analysis of the effect of adjuvant radiotherapy on outcomes and complications after radical hysterectomy in FIGO stage IB1 cervical cancer patients with intermediate risk factors (GOTIC Study).
    Nakamura K; Kitahara Y; Satoh T; Takei Y; Takano M; Nagao S; Sekiguchi I; Suzuki M
    World J Surg Oncol; 2016 Jun; 14(1):173. PubMed ID: 27356862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Radical hysterectomy with adjuvant radiotherapy versus radical radiotherapy for FIGO stage IIB cervical cancer.
    Chai Y; Wang T; Wang J; Yang Y; Gao Y; Gao J; Gao S; Wang Y; Zhou X; Liu Z
    BMC Cancer; 2014 Feb; 14():63. PubMed ID: 24495453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Surgical pathologic factors in patients with early-stage cervical carcinoma treated with radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection: association with administration of adjuvant radiotherapy and effect on survival.
    Piura B; Rabinovich A; Friger M
    Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2006; 27(6):573-8. PubMed ID: 17290585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Radical hysterectomy with or without para-aortic lymphadenectomy for patients with stage IB2, IIA2, and IIB cervical cancer: outcomes for a series of 308 patients.
    Tsuruga T; Fujimoto A; Kawana K; Mori M; Hasumi Y; Kino N; Tomio K; Miura S; Tanikawa M; Sone K; Miyamoto Y; Ikeda Y; Kojima S; Adachi K; Nagasaka K; Matsumoto Y; Arimoto T; Oda K; Nakagawa S; Horie K; Yasugi T; Yokota H; Osuga Y; Fujii T
    Int J Clin Oncol; 2016 Apr; 21(2):359-366. PubMed ID: 26438230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Postoperative nomogram for the prediction of disease-free survival in lymph node-negative stage I-IIA cervical cancer patients treated with radical hysterectomy.
    Gülseren V; Kocaer M; Çakır İ; Özdemir İA; Sancı M; Güngördük K
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2020 Jul; 40(5):699-704. PubMed ID: 31607197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 41.