BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32467631)

  • 1. Comparison of digital subtraction dacryocystography and dacryoendoscopy in patients with epiphora.
    Bae SH; Park J; Lee JK
    Eye (Lond); 2021 Mar; 35(3):877-882. PubMed ID: 32467631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy of the Lacrimal Syringing Test in Relation to Dacryocystography and Dacryoendoscopy.
    Nakamura J; Kamao T; Mitani A; Mizuki N; Shiraishi A
    Clin Ophthalmol; 2023; 17():1277-1285. PubMed ID: 37162802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction: Comparison of CT-DCG and dacryoendoscopy in accurately localizing the lacrimal drainage obstructions.
    Zhang W; Li L; Zhang L; Ding Y; Liu X; Ali MJ; Xiao C
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2024 Feb; ():11206721241230581. PubMed ID: 38327083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Digital subtraction dacryocystography and syringing in the management of epiphora.
    Saleh GM; Gauba V; Tsangaris P; Tharmaseelan K
    Orbit; 2007 Dec; 26(4):249-53. PubMed ID: 18097962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The role of dacryocystography in the management of patients with epiphora.
    Nixon J; Birchall IW; Virjee J
    Br J Radiol; 1990 May; 63(749):337-9. PubMed ID: 2379059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Soft stop on syringing and probing may have a high false-positive rate in diagnosing pre-sac obstruction.
    Usmani E; Shapira Y; Macri C; Davis G; Selva D
    Int Ophthalmol; 2023 Apr; 43(4):1127-1133. PubMed ID: 36103103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Lacrimal imaging findings in fellow asymptomatic eyes of unilateral epiphora.
    Macri C; Shapira Y; Selva D
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2022 Nov; 32(6):3328-3332. PubMed ID: 35261267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Syringing has limited reliability in differentiating nasolacrimal duct stenosis from functional delay.
    Shapira Y; Juniat V; Macri C; Selva D
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2022 Sep; 260(9):3037-3042. PubMed ID: 35460361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Low-dose helical CT-dacryocystography in nasolacrimal duct obstruction-a prospective study].
    Reichel O; Gora F; Dittrich M; Kugler V
    HNO; 2019 Aug; 67(8):600-605. PubMed ID: 31053940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance dacryocystography in patients with epiphora.
    Kirchhof K; Hähnel S; Jansen O; Zake S; Sartor K
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2000; 24(2):327-31. PubMed ID: 10752902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. MR dacryocystography: comparison with dacryoendoscopy in positional diagnosis of nasolacrimal duct obstruction.
    Higashi H; Tamada T; Mizukawa K; Ito K
    Radiol Med; 2016 Jul; 121(7):580-7. PubMed ID: 27048401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. High nasolacrimal sac-duct junction anatomical variation - retrospective review of dacryocystography images.
    Juniat V; Lee J; Sia P; Curragh D; Hardy TG; Selva D
    Orbit; 2021 Dec; 40(6):505-508. PubMed ID: 32893697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Lacrimal Duct Obstruction Caused by Nasomaxillary Fracture: A Retrospective Analysis of Consecutive 12 Patients by Computed Tomographic Dacryocystography.
    Hasegawa Y; Niimi Y; Kamei W; Ikeda K; Sakurai H
    J Craniofac Surg; 2021 Jun; 32(4):1396-1399. PubMed ID: 33427771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Functional epiphora: an under-reported entity.
    Usmani E; Shapira Y; Selva D
    Int Ophthalmol; 2023 Aug; 43(8):2687-2693. PubMed ID: 36952153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Interobserver agreement on interpretation of conventional dacryocystography and dacryoscintigraphy findings: A retrospective single-centre study.
    Sia PI; Curragh D; Howell S; Selva D
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2019 Aug; 47(6):713-717. PubMed ID: 30866143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cone Beam Computerized Tomography Dacryocystography (CBCT DCG) for the Evaluation of Lacrimal Drainage System Dysfunction.
    Karlin JN; Mustak H; Gupta A; Ramos R; Rootman DB
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2020; 36(6):549-552. PubMed ID: 32251183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dacryoendoscopic Findings of Patients with Lacrimal Drainage Obstruction Associated with Cancer Treatment.
    Kim Y; Lew H
    Korean J Ophthalmol; 2022 Dec; 36(6):509-517. PubMed ID: 36220641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dynamic MR dacryocystography in patients with epiphora.
    Cubuk R; Tasali N; Aydin S; Saydam B; Sengor T
    Eur J Radiol; 2010 Feb; 73(2):230-3. PubMed ID: 19062211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Diagnostics and treatment of lacrimal duct diseases : A structured patient-centred care concept].
    Heichel J; Struck HG; Glien A
    HNO; 2018 Oct; 66(10):751-759. PubMed ID: 30019233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparing the diagnostic accuracy of MR dacryocystography (MRD) and dacryoscintigraphy (DSG) in NLDO-related acquired epiphora.
    Aslanduz AA; Mahmoudian B; Sadigh AL; Nahchami E; Jahanshahi A
    Int Ophthalmol; 2024 Feb; 44(1):88. PubMed ID: 38363448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.