These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
298 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32467815)
1. Comparison of Ureteroscopic Pneumatic Lithotripsy and Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Proximal Ureteral Calculi. Ur Rehman MF; Adnan M; Hassan A; Humayun Akhtar F; Javed N; Ali F Cureus; 2020 Apr; 12(4):e7840. PubMed ID: 32467815 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Patient Satisfaction with Treatment Outcomes between Ureteroscopy and Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Proximal Ureteral Stones. Lee JH; Woo SH; Kim ET; Kim DK; Park J Korean J Urol; 2010 Nov; 51(11):788-93. PubMed ID: 21165201 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of ureteroscopic pneumatic lithotripsy and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for the management of proximal ureteral stones: A single center experience. Iqbal N; Malik Y; Nadeem U; Khalid M; Pirzada A; Majeed M; Malik HA; Akhter S Turk J Urol; 2018 May; 44(3):221-227. PubMed ID: 29733796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Extracorporeal shock-wave versus pneumatic ureteroscopic lithotripsy in treatment of lower ureteral calculi. Zeng GQ; Zhong WD; Cai YB; Dai QS; Hu JB; Wei HA Asian J Androl; 2002 Dec; 4(4):303-5. PubMed ID: 12508134 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of semirigid ureteroscopy, flexible ureteroscopy, and shock wave lithotripsy for initial treatment of 11-20 mm proximal ureteral stones. Kartal I; Baylan B; Çakıcı MÇ; Sarı S; Selmi V; Ozdemir H; Yalçınkaya F Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2020 Apr; 92(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 32255321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prospective comparison of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy in distal ureteral stones. Gong Z; Li Y; Zhang H; Pan C; Li J; Liu G; Bai S Urolithiasis; 2023 Jun; 51(1):86. PubMed ID: 37272997 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of previous SWL on ureterorenoscopy outcomes and optimal timing for ureterorenoscopy after SWL failure in proximal ureteral stones. Irer B; Sahin MO; Erbatu O; Yildiz A; Ongun S; Cinar O; Cihan A; Sahin M; Sen V; Ucer O; Kizilay F; Bozkurt O; World J Urol; 2020 Mar; 38(3):769-774. PubMed ID: 31098658 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Intracorporeal or extracorporeal lithotripsy for distal ureteral calculi? Effect of stone size and multiplicity on success rates. Eden CG; Mark IR; Gupta RR; Eastman J; Shrotri NC; Tiptaft RC J Endourol; 1998 Aug; 12(4):307-12. PubMed ID: 9726396 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of ureteroscopy (URS) complementary treatment after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy failure with primary URS lithotripsy with holmium laser treatment for proximal ureteral stones larger than10mm. Yao F; Jiang X; Xie B; Liu N BMC Urol; 2021 Sep; 21(1):126. PubMed ID: 34517851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cost-effectiveness comparison of ureteral calculi treated with ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy versus shockwave lithotripsy. Cone EB; Pareek G; Ursiny M; Eisner B World J Urol; 2017 Jan; 35(1):161-166. PubMed ID: 27145788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy for management of pediatric nephrolithiasis in upper urinary tract stones: multi-institutional outcomes of efficacy and morbidity. Marchetti KA; Lee T; Raja N; Corona L; Kraft KH; Wan J; Ellison JS J Pediatr Urol; 2019 Oct; 15(5):516.e1-516.e8. PubMed ID: 31326329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A prospective randomized study comparing shock wave lithotripsy and semirigid ureteroscopy for the management of proximal ureteral calculi. Salem HK Urology; 2009 Dec; 74(6):1216-21. PubMed ID: 19815264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of SWL and URS on health-related quality of life in proximal ureteral stones. Ceylan Y; Ucer O; Bozkurt O; Gunlusoy B; Mertoglu O; Zumrutbas AE; Yildiz G; Irer B; Muezzinoglu T; Demir O Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2018 Jun; 27(3):148-152. PubMed ID: 28697638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. What are the Benefits and Harms of Ureteroscopy Compared with Shock-wave Lithotripsy in the Treatment of Upper Ureteral Stones? A Systematic Review. Drake T; Grivas N; Dabestani S; Knoll T; Lam T; Maclennan S; Petrik A; Skolarikos A; Straub M; Tuerk C; Yuan CY; Sarica K Eur Urol; 2017 Nov; 72(5):772-786. PubMed ID: 28456350 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy in patients with proximal ureteral stones under the COVID-19 pandemic. Wang P; Zhan Y; Li J; Liu G; Li Z; Bai S World J Urol; 2023 Mar; 41(3):797-803. PubMed ID: 36729301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ureteroscopy is more cost effective than shock wave lithotripsy for stone treatment: systematic review and meta-analysis. Geraghty RM; Jones P; Herrmann TRW; Aboumarzouk O; Somani BK World J Urol; 2018 Nov; 36(11):1783-1793. PubMed ID: 29730839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison between extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and semirigid ureterorenoscope with holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy for treating large proximal ureteral stones. Wu CF; Shee JJ; Lin WY; Lin CL; Chen CS J Urol; 2004 Nov; 172(5 Pt 1):1899-902. PubMed ID: 15540749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Treatment for extended-mid and distal ureteral stones: SWL or ureteroscopy? Results of a multicenter study. Hendrikx AJ; Strijbos WE; de Knijff DW; Kums JJ; Doesburg WH; Lemmens WA J Endourol; 1999 Dec; 13(10):727-33. PubMed ID: 10646679 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]