These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32468152)
21. Targeting best agricultural practices to enhance ecosystem services in European mountains. Bernués A; Tenza-Peral A; Gómez-Baggethun E; Clemetsen M; Eik LO; Martín-Collado D J Environ Manage; 2022 Aug; 316():115255. PubMed ID: 35576705 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Connecting biodiversity and human dimensions through ecosystem services: The Numto Nature Park in West Siberia. Minayeva TY; Filippov IV; Tysiachniouk MS; Markina AV; Kiselev SB; Lapshina ED; Sirin AA Ambio; 2021 Nov; 50(11):2009-2021. PubMed ID: 34559390 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Linking biodiversity to ecosystem services supply: Patterns across aquatic ecosystems. Teixeira H; Lillebø AI; Culhane F; Robinson L; Trauner D; Borgwardt F; Kuemmerlen M; Barbosa A; McDonald H; Funk A; O'Higgins T; Van der Wal JT; Piet G; Hein T; Arévalo-Torres J; Iglesias-Campos A; Barbière J; Nogueira AJA Sci Total Environ; 2019 Mar; 657():517-534. PubMed ID: 30550915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Green Infrastructure Design Based on Spatial Conservation Prioritization and Modeling of Biodiversity Features and Ecosystem Services. Snäll T; Lehtomäki J; Arponen A; Elith J; Moilanen A Environ Manage; 2016 Feb; 57(2):251-6. PubMed ID: 26395184 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Challenges of and opportunities for protecting European soil biodiversity. Zeiss R; Eisenhauer N; Orgiazzi A; Rillig M; Buscot F; Jones A; Lehmann A; Reitz T; Smith L; Guerra CA Conserv Biol; 2022 Oct; 36(5):e13930. PubMed ID: 35510330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Local perception of ecosystem services and their conservation in Sudanian savannas of Burkina Faso (West Africa). Nabaloum A; Goetze D; Ouédraogo A; Porembski S; Thiombiano A J Ethnobiol Ethnomed; 2022 Feb; 18(1):8. PubMed ID: 35183193 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Marine conservation: towards a multi-layered network approach. Jacob U; Beckerman A; Antonijevic M; Dee LE; Eklöf A; Possingham HP; Thompson R; Webb TJ; Halpern BS Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2020 Dec; 375(1814):20190459. PubMed ID: 33131435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Challenges during the execution, results, and monitoring phases of ecological restoration: Learning from a country-wide assessment. Méndez-Toribio M; Martínez-Garza C; Ceccon E PLoS One; 2021; 16(4):e0249573. PubMed ID: 33822816 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A conservation decision-making framework based on ecosystem service hotspot and interaction analyses on multiple scales. Hou Y; Li B; Müller F; Fu Q; Chen W Sci Total Environ; 2018 Dec; 643():277-291. PubMed ID: 29940440 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The quest for a mechanistic understanding of biodiversity-ecosystem services relationships. Duncan C; Thompson JR; Pettorelli N Proc Biol Sci; 2015 Oct; 282(1817):20151348. PubMed ID: 26468240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Valuing biodiversity and ecosystem services: a useful way to manage and conserve marine resources? Cavanagh RD; Broszeit S; Pilling GM; Grant SM; Murphy EJ; Austen MC Proc Biol Sci; 2016 Dec; 283(1844):. PubMed ID: 27928037 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The potential of ecosystem-based management to integrate biodiversity conservation and ecosystem service provision in aquatic ecosystems. Langhans SD; Jähnig SC; Lago M; Schmidt-Kloiber A; Hein T Sci Total Environ; 2019 Jul; 672():1017-1020. PubMed ID: 30986745 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Ecosystem services consideration in the remediation process for contaminated sites. Harwell MC; Jackson C; Kravitz M; Lynch K; Tomasula J; Neale A; Mahoney M; Pachon C; Scheuermann K; Grissom G; Parry K J Environ Manage; 2021 May; 285():112102. PubMed ID: 33588170 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Assessing the multiple benefits of partially protected marine protected areas in Australia: A systematic review protocol. Phillips GAC; Krueck N; Ogier E; Barrett N; Dutton I; Hartmann K PLoS One; 2023; 18(4):e0284711. PubMed ID: 37079655 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Ecosystem services in risk assessment and management. Munns WR; Poulsen V; Gala WR; Marshall SJ; Rea AW; Sorensen MT; von Stackelberg K Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2017 Jan; 13(1):62-73. PubMed ID: 27464004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Mapping of biodiversity hubs and key ecosystem services as a tool for shaping optimal areas for conservation. Gatwaza OC; Wang X PLoS One; 2021; 16(8):e0253151. PubMed ID: 34403432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Ecosystem Services as a Promising Paradigm to Protect Environmental Rights of Indigenous Peoples in Latin America: the Constitutional Court Landmark Decision to Protect Arroyo Bruno in Colombia. Gómez-Betancur L; Vilardy Q SP; Torres R D Environ Manage; 2022 Apr; 69(4):768-780. PubMed ID: 34028596 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]