These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
408 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32469723)
1. 3D metal printing in dentistry: An in vitro biomechanical comparative study of two additive manufacturing technologies for full-arch implant-supported prostheses. Barbin T; Velôso DV; Del Rio Silva L; Borges GA; Presotto AGC; Barão VAR; Mesquita MF J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2020 Aug; 108():103821. PubMed ID: 32469723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Additive Manufacturing of Metallic Frameworks Supported by the All-on-Six Implant Concept: Dimensional Precision After Veneer Layering and Spark Erosion. Velôso DV; Barbin T; Del Rio Silva L; Borges GA; Camacho Presotto AG; Mesquita MF Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022; 37(4):700-708. PubMed ID: 35904826 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Can ceramic veneer spark erosion and mechanical cycling affect the accuracy of milled complete-arch frameworks supported by 6 implants? Del Rio Silva L; Velôso DV; Barbin T; Borges GA; Presotto AGC; Mesquita MF J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Dec; 126(6):772-778. PubMed ID: 33087248 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Hot isostatic pressing as an alternative thermo-mechanical treatment for metallic full-arch implant-supported frameworks obtained by additive and subtractive manufacturing technology: Vertical and horizontal fit, screw removal torque, and stress analysis. Barbin T; Borges GA; Jardini AL; Mesquita MF J Prosthodont; 2024 Sep; 33(S1):70-80. PubMed ID: 38513224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fit and Stability of Screw-Retained Implant-Supported Frameworks Under Masticatory Simulation: Influence of Cylinder Type. Bhering CL; Marques Ida S; Takahashi JM; Barão VA; Consani RL; Mesquita MF J Prosthodont; 2016 Aug; 25(6):459-65. PubMed ID: 26465960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of feldspathic porcelain layering on the marginal fit of zirconia and titanium complete-arch fixed implant-supported frameworks. Yilmaz B; Alshahrani FA; Kale E; Johnston WM J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jul; 120(1):71-78. PubMed ID: 29426786 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Marginal fit and photoelastic stress analysis of CAD-CAM and overcast 3-unit implant-supported frameworks. Presotto AG; Bhering CL; Mesquita MF; Barão VA J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Mar; 117(3):373-379. PubMed ID: 27666497 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The role of welding techniques in the biomechanical behavior of implant-supported prostheses. Rodrigues SA; Presotto AGC; Barão VAR; Consani RLX; Nóbilo MAA; Mesquita MF Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2017 Sep; 78():435-442. PubMed ID: 28576006 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Discrepancy of complete-arch titanium frameworks manufactured using selective laser melting and electron beam melting additive manufacturing technologies. Revilla-León M; Ceballos L; Martínez-Klemm I; Özcan M J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Dec; 120(6):942-947. PubMed ID: 30006219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of manufacturing techniques on the marginal and internal fit of cobalt-chromium implant-supported multiunit frameworks. Akçin ET; Güncü MB; Aktaş G; Aslan Y J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Nov; 120(5):715-720. PubMed ID: 30017153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. 3D Metal Printing - Additive Manufacturing Technologies for Frameworks of Implant-Borne Fixed Dental Prosthesis. Revilla León M; Klemm IM; García-Arranz J; Özcan M Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2017 Sep; 25(3):143-147. PubMed ID: 28869368 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Marginal fit of 3-unit implant-supported fixed partial dentures: Influence of pattern fabrication method and repeated porcelain firings. Giti R; Farrahi P PLoS One; 2024; 19(4):e0301799. PubMed ID: 38625846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Implant-Abutment Discrepancy Before and After Acrylic Resin Veneering of Complete-Arch Titanium Frameworks Manufactured Using Milling and Electron Beam Melting Technologies. Revilla-León M; Pérez-López J; Barmak AB; Raigrodski AJ; Rubenstein J; Galluci GO J Prosthodont; 2022 Mar; 31(S1):88-96. PubMed ID: 35313021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Misfit of pure titanium frameworks: effect of veneer coverage and spark erosion process. Nakaoka MM; Nuñez-Pantoja JM; Takahashi JM; Consani RL; Mesquita MF Acta Odontol Scand; 2011 Jul; 69(4):238-42. PubMed ID: 21306198 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of porcelain firing and cementation on the marginal fit of implant-supported metal-ceramic restorations fabricated by additive or subtractive manufacturing methods. Yildirim B J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Oct; 124(4):476.e1-476.e6. PubMed ID: 32451142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of casting and masticatory simulation on strain and misfit of implant-supported metal frameworks. Bhering CL; Marques Ida S; Takahashi JM; Barão VA; Consani RL; Mesquita MF Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2016 May; 62():746-51. PubMed ID: 26952480 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. In vitro precision of fit of computer-aided designed and computer-aided manufactured titanium screw-retained fixed dental prostheses before and after ceramic veneering. Katsoulis J; Mericske-Stern R; Enkling N; Katsoulis K; Blatz MB Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015; 26(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 24289301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]