275 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32469901)
1. Patient preferences when searching for clinical trials and adherence of study records to ClinicalTrials.gov guidance in key registry data fields.
Schindler TM; Grieger F; Zak A; Rorig R; Chowdary Konka K; Ellsworth A; Pfitzer C; Hodge K; Crandall C;
PLoS One; 2020; 15(5):e0233294. PubMed ID: 32469901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. ClinicalTrials.gov registration can supplement information in abstracts for systematic reviews: a comparison study.
Scherer RW; Huynh L; Ervin AM; Taylor J; Dickersin K
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2013 Jun; 13():79. PubMed ID: 23773868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The fate of prospective spine studies registered on www.ClinicalTrials.gov.
Ohnmeiss DD
Spine J; 2015 Mar; 15(3):487-91. PubMed ID: 25315132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Changes to registration elements and results in a cohort of Clinicaltrials.gov trials were not reflected in published articles.
Pranić S; Marušić A
J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Feb; 70():26-37. PubMed ID: 26226103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Characteristics of clinical trial websites: information distribution between ClinicalTrials.gov and 13 primary registries in the WHO registry network.
Ogino D; Takahashi K; Sato H
Trials; 2014 Nov; 15():428. PubMed ID: 25373358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Adding value to clinical trial registries: insights from Australian Cancer Trials Online, a website for consumers.
Dear R; Barratt A; Askie L; McGeechan K; Arora S; Crossing S; Currow D; Tattersall M
Clin Trials; 2011 Feb; 8(1):70-6. PubMed ID: 21335591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Drug-drug interaction trials incompletely described drug interventions in ClinicalTrials.gov and published articles: an observational study.
Jurić D; Bolić A; Pranić S; Marušić A
J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Jan; 117():126-137. PubMed ID: 31654788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The ClinicalTrials.gov results database--update and key issues.
Zarin DA; Tse T; Williams RJ; Califf RM; Ide NC
N Engl J Med; 2011 Mar; 364(9):852-60. PubMed ID: 21366476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Addressing the quality of submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov for registration and results posting: The use of a checklist.
Tetteh O; Nuamah P; Keyes A
Clin Trials; 2020 Dec; 17(6):717-722. PubMed ID: 32755266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Characteristics of clinical trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov, 2007-2010.
Califf RM; Zarin DA; Kramer JM; Sherman RE; Aberle LH; Tasneem A
JAMA; 2012 May; 307(17):1838-47. PubMed ID: 22550198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical trial registry use in anaesthesiology systematic reviews: A cross-sectional study of systematic reviews published in anaesthesiology journals and the Cochrane Library.
Umberham BA; Detweiler BN; Sims MT; Vassar M
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2017 Dec; 34(12):797-807. PubMed ID: 28731924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of Trends in the Design, Accrual, and Completion of Trials Registered in ClinicalTrials.gov by Sponsor Type, 2000-2019.
Gresham G; Meinert JL; Gresham AG; Meinert CL
JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Aug; 3(8):e2014682. PubMed ID: 32845329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Update on the clinical trial landscape: analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov registration data, 2000-2020.
Gresham G; Meinert JL; Gresham AG; Piantadosi S; Meinert CL
Trials; 2022 Oct; 23(1):858. PubMed ID: 36203212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Issues in the registration of clinical trials.
Zarin DA; Ide NC; Tse T; Harlan WR; West JC; Lindberg DA
JAMA; 2007 May; 297(19):2112-20. PubMed ID: 17507347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Current landscape of type 1 diabetes mellitus-related interventional clinical trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov: a cross-sectional study.
Liang R; Long J; Zheng Q; Yuan G; Chen X; Xin Z; Lai F; Liu Y
Acta Diabetol; 2021 Jun; 58(6):723-733. PubMed ID: 33543370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of reporting phase I trial results in ClinicalTrials.gov and matched publications.
Shepshelovich D; Goldvaser H; Wang L; Abdul Razak AR; Bedard PL
Invest New Drugs; 2017 Dec; 35(6):827-833. PubMed ID: 28905282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. ClinicalTrials.gov as a data source for semi-automated point-of-care trial eligibility screening.
Pfiffner PB; Oh J; Miller TA; Mandl KD
PLoS One; 2014; 9(10):e111055. PubMed ID: 25334031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of blogshots with plain language summaries of Cochrane systematic reviews: a qualitative study and randomized trial.
Buljan I; Tokalić R; Roguljić M; Zakarija-Grković I; Vrdoljak D; Milić P; Puljak L; Marušić A
Trials; 2020 May; 21(1):426. PubMed ID: 32450904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Brustkrebs-Studien.de website for breast cancer patients: User acceptance of a German internet portal offering information on the disease and treatment options, and a clinical trials matching service.
Wallwiener M; Wallwiener CW; Brucker SY; Hartkopf AD; Fehm TN; Kansy JK
BMC Cancer; 2010 Dec; 10():663. PubMed ID: 21126358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The project data sphere initiative: accelerating cancer research by sharing data.
Green AK; Reeder-Hayes KE; Corty RW; Basch E; Milowsky MI; Dusetzina SB; Bennett AV; Wood WA
Oncologist; 2015 May; 20(5):464-e20. PubMed ID: 25876994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
