287 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32470373)
1. Non-parametric Polygenic Risk Prediction via Partitioned GWAS Summary Statistics.
Chun S; Imakaev M; Hui D; Patsopoulos NA; Neale BM; Kathiresan S; Stitziel NO; Sunyaev SR
Am J Hum Genet; 2020 Jul; 107(1):46-59. PubMed ID: 32470373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Contrasting the Genetic Architecture of 30 Complex Traits from Summary Association Data.
Shi H; Kichaev G; Pasaniuc B
Am J Hum Genet; 2016 Jul; 99(1):139-53. PubMed ID: 27346688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Polygenic prediction via Bayesian regression and continuous shrinkage priors.
Ge T; Chen CY; Ni Y; Feng YA; Smoller JW
Nat Commun; 2019 Apr; 10(1):1776. PubMed ID: 30992449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of prediction of simulated polygenic phenotypes and their underlying quantitative trait loci genotypes using real or imputed whole-genome markers in cattle.
Hassani S; Saatchi M; Fernando RL; Garrick DJ
Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Dec; 47():99. PubMed ID: 26698091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A robust method to estimate regional polygenic correlation under misspecified linkage disequilibrium structure.
Paré G; Mao S; Deng WQ
Genet Epidemiol; 2018 Oct; 42(7):636-647. PubMed ID: 30156736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Variable prediction accuracy of polygenic scores within an ancestry group.
Mostafavi H; Harpak A; Agarwal I; Conley D; Pritchard JK; Przeworski M
Elife; 2020 Jan; 9():. PubMed ID: 31999256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Modeling Linkage Disequilibrium Increases Accuracy of Polygenic Risk Scores.
Vilhjálmsson BJ; Yang J; Finucane HK; Gusev A; Lindström S; Ripke S; Genovese G; Loh PR; Bhatia G; Do R; Hayeck T; Won HH; ; Kathiresan S; Pato M; Pato C; Tamimi R; Stahl E; Zaitlen N; Pasaniuc B; Belbin G; Kenny EE; Schierup MH; De Jager P; Patsopoulos NA; McCarroll S; Daly M; Purcell S; Chasman D; Neale B; Goddard M; Visscher PM; Kraft P; Patterson N; Price AL
Am J Hum Genet; 2015 Oct; 97(4):576-92. PubMed ID: 26430803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Joint modeling of genetically correlated diseases and functional annotations increases accuracy of polygenic risk prediction.
Hu Y; Lu Q; Liu W; Zhang Y; Li M; Zhao H
PLoS Genet; 2017 Jun; 13(6):e1006836. PubMed ID: 28598966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. POLARIS: Polygenic LD-adjusted risk score approach for set-based analysis of GWAS data.
Baker E; Schmidt KM; Sims R; O'Donovan MC; Williams J; Holmans P; Escott-Price V; Consortium WTG
Genet Epidemiol; 2018 Jun; 42(4):366-377. PubMed ID: 29532500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Haplotype function score improves biological interpretation and cross-ancestry polygenic prediction of human complex traits.
Song W; Shi Y; Lin GN
Elife; 2024 Apr; 12():. PubMed ID: 38639992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Estimation of complex effect-size distributions using summary-level statistics from genome-wide association studies across 32 complex traits.
Zhang Y; Qi G; Park JH; Chatterjee N
Nat Genet; 2018 Sep; 50(9):1318-1326. PubMed ID: 30104760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Genome-Wide Association Study of Suicide Death and Polygenic Prediction of Clinical Antecedents.
Docherty AR; Shabalin AA; DiBlasi E; Monson E; Mullins N; Adkins DE; Bacanu SA; Bakian AV; Crowell S; Chen D; Darlington TM; Callor WB; Christensen ED; Gray D; Keeshin B; Klein M; Anderson JS; Jerominski L; Hayward C; Porteous DJ; McIntosh A; Li Q; Coon H
Am J Psychiatry; 2020 Oct; 177(10):917-927. PubMed ID: 32998551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Empirical and deterministic accuracies of across-population genomic prediction.
Wientjes YC; Veerkamp RF; Bijma P; Bovenhuis H; Schrooten C; Calus MP
Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Feb; 47(1):5. PubMed ID: 25885467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of methods for estimating genetic correlation between complex traits using GWAS summary statistics.
Zhang Y; Cheng Y; Jiang W; Ye Y; Lu Q; Zhao H
Brief Bioinform; 2021 Sep; 22(5):. PubMed ID: 33497438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Underestimation of heritability using a mixed model with a polygenic covariance structure in a genome-wide association study for complex traits.
Ryoo H; Lee C
Eur J Hum Genet; 2014 Jun; 22(6):851-4. PubMed ID: 24149545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fast and accurate Bayesian polygenic risk modeling with variational inference.
Zabad S; Gravel S; Li Y
Am J Hum Genet; 2023 May; 110(5):741-761. PubMed ID: 37030289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Genomic prediction based on selective linkage disequilibrium pruning of low-coverage whole-genome sequence variants in a pure Duroc population.
Zhu D; Zhao Y; Zhang R; Wu H; Cai G; Wu Z; Wang Y; Hu X
Genet Sel Evol; 2023 Oct; 55(1):72. PubMed ID: 37853325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A fast and robust Bayesian nonparametric method for prediction of complex traits using summary statistics.
Zhou G; Zhao H
PLoS Genet; 2021 Jul; 17(7):e1009697. PubMed ID: 34310601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. PUMAS: fine-tuning polygenic risk scores with GWAS summary statistics.
Zhao Z; Yi Y; Song J; Wu Y; Zhong X; Lin Y; Hohman TJ; Fletcher J; Lu Q
Genome Biol; 2021 Sep; 22(1):257. PubMed ID: 34488838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Genetic prediction of quantitative lipid traits: comparing shrinkage models to gene scores.
Warren H; Casas JP; Hingorani A; Dudbridge F; Whittaker J
Genet Epidemiol; 2014 Jan; 38(1):72-83. PubMed ID: 24272946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
