275 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32470821)
1. Simulating Automated Emergency Braking with and without Torricelli Vacuum Emergency Braking for cyclists: Effect of brake deceleration and sensor field-of-view on accidents, injuries and fatalities.
Jeppsson H; Lubbe N
Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Jul; 142():105538. PubMed ID: 32470821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Real life safety benefits of increasing brake deceleration in car-to-pedestrian accidents: Simulation of Vacuum Emergency Braking.
Jeppsson H; Östling M; Lubbe N
Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Feb; 111():311-320. PubMed ID: 29257980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. AEB effectiveness evaluation based on car-to-cyclist accident reconstructions using video of drive recorder.
Zhao Y; Ito D; Mizuno K
Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(1):100-106. PubMed ID: 30822153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prospective assessment of the effectiveness of autonomous emergency braking in car-to-cyclist accidents in France.
Chajmowicz H; Saadé J; Cuny S
Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup2):S20-S25. PubMed ID: 31750740
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Market penetration of intersection AEB: Characterizing avoided and residual straight crossing path accidents.
Sander U; Lubbe N
Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Jun; 115():178-188. PubMed ID: 29604516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of Integrated Pedestrian Protection Systems with Autonomous Emergency Braking (AEB) and Passive Safety Components.
Edwards M; Nathanson A; Carroll J; Wisch M; Zander O; Lubbe N
Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 1():S2-S11. PubMed ID: 26027971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quantifying Vision Zero: Crash avoidance in rural and motorway accident scenarios by combination of ACC, AEB, and LKS projected to German accident occurrence.
Stark L; Düring M; Schoenawa S; Maschke JE; Do CM
Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup1):S126-S132. PubMed ID: 31381430
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Estimate of potential benefit for Europe of fitting Autonomous Emergency Braking (AEB) systems for pedestrian protection to passenger cars.
Edwards M; Nathanson A; Wisch M
Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15 Suppl 1():S173-82. PubMed ID: 25307384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Estimated benefit of automated emergency braking systems for vehicle-pedestrian crashes in the United States.
Haus SH; Sherony R; Gabler HC
Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup1):S171-S176. PubMed ID: 31381447
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Intersection AEB implementation strategies for left turn across path crashes.
Sander U; Lubbe N; Pietzsch S
Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup1):S119-S125. PubMed ID: 31381448
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Analysis of pre-crash characteristics of passenger car to cyclist accidents for the development of advanced drivers assistance systems.
Char F; Serre T
Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Mar; 136():105408. PubMed ID: 31927453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluating automated emergency braking performance in simulated car-to-two-wheeler crashes in China: A comparison between C-NCAP tests and in-depth crash data.
Sui B; Lubbe N; Bärgman J
Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Sep; 159():106229. PubMed ID: 34225169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The potential of clustering methods to define intersection test scenarios: Assessing real-life performance of AEB.
Sander U; Lubbe N
Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Apr; 113():1-11. PubMed ID: 29355748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effectiveness of forward collision warning and autonomous emergency braking systems in reducing front-to-rear crash rates.
Cicchino JB
Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Feb; 99(Pt A):142-152. PubMed ID: 27898367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of the crash mitigation effect of low-speed automated emergency braking systems based on insurance claims data.
Isaksson-Hellman I; Lindman M
Traffic Inj Prev; 2016 Sep; 17 Suppl 1():42-7. PubMed ID: 27586101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A clustering approach to developing car-to-two-wheeler test scenarios for the assessment of Automated Emergency Braking in China using in-depth Chinese crash data.
Sui B; Lubbe N; Bärgman J
Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Nov; 132():105242. PubMed ID: 31446097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Differential benefit of sensor system field-of-view and range in pedestrian automated emergency braking systems.
Haus SH; Sherony R; Gabler HC
Traffic Inj Prev; 2021; 22(sup1):S111-S115. PubMed ID: 34469208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Characteristics of automatic emergency braking responses in passenger vehicles evaluated in the IIHS front crash prevention program.
Kidd DG; Perez-Rapela D; Jermakian JS
Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Sep; 190():107150. PubMed ID: 37301163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pedestrian injury mitigation by autonomous braking.
Rosén E; Källhammer JE; Eriksson D; Nentwich M; Fredriksson R; Smith K
Accid Anal Prev; 2010 Nov; 42(6):1949-57. PubMed ID: 20728647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Opportunities and limitations for intersection collision intervention-A study of real world 'left turn across path' accidents.
Sander U
Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Feb; 99(Pt A):342-355. PubMed ID: 28043070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
