These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

368 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32471471)

  • 21. Breast density, scintimammographic (99m)Tc(V)DMSA uptake, and calcitonin gene related peptide (CGRP) expression in mixed invasive ductal associated with extensive in situ ductal carcinoma (IDC + DCIS) and pure invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC): correlation with estrogen receptor (ER) status, proliferation index Ki-67, and histological grade.
    Papantoniou V; Sotiropoulou E; Valsamaki P; Tsaroucha A; Sotiropoulou M; Ptohis N; Stipsanelli A; Dimitrakakis K; Marinopoulos S; Tsiouris S; Antsaklis A
    Breast Cancer; 2011 Oct; 18(4):286-91. PubMed ID: 20143189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Apocrine ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: histologic classification and expression of biologic markers.
    Leal C; Henrique R; Monteiro P; Lopes C; Bento MJ; De Sousa CP; Lopes P; Olson S; Silva MD; Page DL
    Hum Pathol; 2001 May; 32(5):487-93. PubMed ID: 11381366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Feasibility of Quantitative MRI Using 3D-QALAS for Discriminating Immunohistochemical Status in Invasive Ductal Carcinoma of the Breast.
    Amano M; Fujita S; Takei N; Sano K; Wada A; Sato K; Kikuta J; Kuwatsuru Y; Tachibana R; Sekine T; Horimoto Y; Aoki S
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2023 Dec; 58(6):1752-1759. PubMed ID: 36951614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Quantitative comparison of immunohistochemical staining measured by digital image analysis versus pathologist visual scoring.
    Rizzardi AE; Johnson AT; Vogel RI; Pambuccian SE; Henriksen J; Skubitz AP; Metzger GJ; Schmechel SC
    Diagn Pathol; 2012 Jun; 7():42. PubMed ID: 22515559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Is there different correlation with prognostic factors between "non-mass" and "mass" type invasive ductal breast cancers?
    Jiang L; Zhou Y; Wang Z; Lu X; Chen M; Zhou C
    Eur J Radiol; 2013 Sep; 82(9):1404-9. PubMed ID: 23540946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Automated imaging analysis of Ki-67 immunohistochemistry on whole slide images of cell blocks from pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms.
    Shaker N; Shen R; Limbach AL; Satturwar S; Kobalka P; Ahmadian S; Sun S; Chen W; Lujan G; Esnakula A; Parwani A; Li Z
    J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2024; 13(3):205-212. PubMed ID: 38433072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Potential rapid intraoperative cancer diagnosis using dynamic full-field optical coherence tomography and deep learning: A prospective cohort study in breast cancer patients.
    Zhang S; Yang B; Yang H; Zhao J; Zhang Y; Gao Y; Monteiro O; Zhang K; Liu B; Wang S
    Sci Bull (Beijing); 2024 Jun; 69(11):1748-1756. PubMed ID: 38702279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Bax protein expression in DCIS of the breast in relation to invasive ductal carcinoma and other molecular markers.
    Rehman S; Crow J; Revell PA
    Pathol Oncol Res; 2000; 6(4):256-63. PubMed ID: 11173657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A Multi-Stain Breast Cancer Histological Whole-Slide-Image Data Set from Routine Diagnostics.
    Weitz P; Valkonen M; Solorzano L; Carr C; Kartasalo K; Boissin C; Koivukoski S; Kuusela A; Rasic D; Feng Y; Sinius Pouplier S; Sharma A; Ledesma Eriksson K; Latonen L; Laenkholm AV; Hartman J; Ruusuvuori P; Rantalainen M
    Sci Data; 2023 Aug; 10(1):562. PubMed ID: 37620357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Ki67 expression in invasive breast cancer: the use of tissue microarrays compared with whole tissue sections.
    Muftah AA; Aleskandarany MA; Al-Kaabi MM; Sonbul SN; Diez-Rodriguez M; Nolan CC; Caldas C; Ellis IO; Rakha EA; Green AR
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Jul; 164(2):341-348. PubMed ID: 28478613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of different histopathological methods for the examination of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer.
    Nährig J; Richter T; Kowolik J; Kuhn W; Avril N; Höfler H; Werner M
    Anticancer Res; 2000; 20(3B):2209-12. PubMed ID: 10928179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Construction and validation of artificial intelligence pathomics models for predicting pathological staging in colorectal cancer: Using multimodal data and clinical variables.
    Tan Y; Liu R; Xue JW; Feng Z
    Cancer Med; 2024 Apr; 13(7):e6947. PubMed ID: 38545828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparative diagnostic and prognostic performances of the hematoxylin-eosin and phospho-histone H3 mitotic count and Ki-67 index in adrenocortical carcinoma.
    Duregon E; Molinaro L; Volante M; Ventura L; Righi L; Bolla S; Terzolo M; Sapino A; Papotti MG
    Mod Pathol; 2014 Sep; 27(9):1246-54. PubMed ID: 24434900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. An international Ki67 reproducibility study.
    Polley MY; Leung SC; McShane LM; Gao D; Hugh JC; Mastropasqua MG; Viale G; Zabaglo LA; Penault-Llorca F; Bartlett JM; Gown AM; Symmans WF; Piper T; Mehl E; Enos RA; Hayes DF; Dowsett M; Nielsen TO;
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2013 Dec; 105(24):1897-906. PubMed ID: 24203987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Accuracy and efficiency of an artificial intelligence tool when counting breast mitoses.
    Pantanowitz L; Hartman D; Qi Y; Cho EY; Suh B; Paeng K; Dhir R; Michelow P; Hazelhurst S; Song SY; Cho SY
    Diagn Pathol; 2020 Jul; 15(1):80. PubMed ID: 32622359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluation of immunohistochemical staining using whole-slide imaging for HER2 scoring of breast cancer in comparison with real glass slides.
    Kondo Y; Iijima T; Noguchi M
    Pathol Int; 2012 Sep; 62(9):592-9. PubMed ID: 22924845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Immunohistochemical analysis on biological markers in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.
    Iwase H; Ando Y; Ichihara S; Toyoshima S; Nakamura T; Karamatsu S; Ito Y; Yamashita H; Toyama T; Omoto Y; Fujii Y; Mitsuyama S; Kobayashi S
    Breast Cancer; 2001; 8(2):98-104. PubMed ID: 11342981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Ki-67 assessment of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: Systematic review and meta-analysis of manual vs. digital pathology scoring.
    Luchini C; Pantanowitz L; Adsay V; Asa SL; Antonini P; Girolami I; Veronese N; Nottegar A; Cingarlini S; Landoni L; Brosens LA; Verschuur AV; Mattiolo P; Pea A; Mafficini A; Milella M; Niazi MK; Gurcan MN; Eccher A; Cree IA; Scarpa A
    Mod Pathol; 2022 Jun; 35(6):712-720. PubMed ID: 35249100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Optimized generation of high-resolution phantom images using cGAN: Application to quantification of Ki67 breast cancer images.
    Senaras C; Niazi MKK; Sahiner B; Pennell MP; Tozbikian G; Lozanski G; Gurcan MN
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(5):e0196846. PubMed ID: 29742125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Automated segmentation of routinely hematoxylin-eosin-stained microscopic images by combining support vector machine clustering and active contour models.
    Glotsos D; Spyridonos P; Cavouras D; Ravazoula P; Dadioti PA; Nikiforidis G
    Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 2004 Dec; 26(6):331-40. PubMed ID: 15678615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.