BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32471549)

  • 1. Frequency of Management of Cardiogenic Shock With Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices According to Race.
    Kim Y; Park J; Essa M; Lansky AJ; Sugeng L
    Am J Cardiol; 2020 Jun; 125(12):1782-1787. PubMed ID: 32471549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Trends in mechanical circulatory support use and hospital mortality among patients with acute myocardial infarction and non-infarction related cardiogenic shock in the United States.
    Shah M; Patnaik S; Patel B; Ram P; Garg L; Agarwal M; Agrawal S; Arora S; Patel N; Wald J; Jorde UP
    Clin Res Cardiol; 2018 Apr; 107(4):287-303. PubMed ID: 29134345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hospital Variation in the Utilization of Short-Term Nondurable Mechanical Circulatory Support in Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.
    Strom JB; Zhao Y; Shen C; Chung M; Pinto DS; Popma JJ; Cohen DJ; Yeh RW
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Jan; 12(1):e007270. PubMed ID: 30608880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hospital market concentration and the use of mechanical circulatory support devices in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.
    Vohra AS; Jang SJ; Feldman DN; Goyal P; Krishnan U; Sciria C; Cheung JW; Kim LK
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2022 Jan; 22(1):89. PubMed ID: 35045849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Racial and ethnic disparities in the management and outcomes of cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction.
    Patlolla SH; Shankar A; Sundaragiri PR; Cheungpasitporn W; Doshi RP; Vallabhajosyula S
    Am J Emerg Med; 2022 Jan; 51():202-209. PubMed ID: 34775192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Use of Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices Among Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.
    Dhruva SS; Ross JS; Mortazavi BJ; Hurley NC; Krumholz HM; Curtis JP; Berkowitz AP; Masoudi FA; Messenger JC; Parzynski CS; Ngufor CG; Girotra S; Amin AP; Shah ND; Desai NR
    JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Feb; 4(2):e2037748. PubMed ID: 33616664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Racial Disparities in the Utilization and Outcomes of Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support for Acute Myocardial Infarction-Cardiogenic Shock.
    Vojjini R; Patlolla SH; Cheungpasitporn W; Kumar A; Sundaragiri PR; Doshi RP; Jaffe AS; Barsness GW; Holmes DR; Rab ST; Vallabhajosyula S
    J Clin Med; 2021 Apr; 10(7):. PubMed ID: 33918132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Utilization and Outcomes of Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices in Cardiogenic Shock.
    Enezate T; Eniezat M; Thomas J
    Am J Cardiol; 2019 Aug; 124(4):505-510. PubMed ID: 31204034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. National trends, predictors of use, and in-hospital outcomes in mechanical circulatory support for cardiogenic shock.
    Strom JB; Zhao Y; Shen C; Chung M; Pinto DS; Popma JJ; Yeh RW
    EuroIntervention; 2018 Apr; 13(18):e2152-e2159. PubMed ID: 29400657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sociodemographic differences in utilization and outcomes for temporary cardiovascular mechanical support in the setting of cardiogenic shock.
    Thangam M; Luke AA; Johnson DY; Amin AP; Lasala J; Huang K; Joynt Maddox KE
    Am Heart J; 2021 Jun; 236():87-96. PubMed ID: 33359779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cardiogenic shock during heart failure hospitalizations: Age-, sex-, and race-stratified trends in incidence and outcomes.
    Yandrapalli S; Sanaani A; Harikrishnan P; Aronow WS; Frishman WH; Lanier GM; Ahmed A; Fonarow GC
    Am Heart J; 2019 Jul; 213():18-29. PubMed ID: 31078113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Escalation strategies, management, and outcomes of acute myocardial infarction-cardiogenic shock patients receiving percutaneous left ventricular support.
    Patlolla SH; Gilbert ON; Belford PM; Morris BN; Jentzer JC; Pisani BA; Applegate RJ; Zhao DX; Vallabhajosyula S
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2023 Sep; 102(3):403-414. PubMed ID: 37473420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cardiogenic shock: incidence, survival and mechanical circulatory support usage 2007-2017-insights from a national registry.
    Lang CN; Kaier K; Zotzmann V; Stachon P; Pottgiesser T; von Zur Muehlen C; Zehender M; Duerschmied D; Schmid B; Bode C; Wengenmayer T; Staudacher DL
    Clin Res Cardiol; 2021 Sep; 110(9):1421-1430. PubMed ID: 33258007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Early vs. delayed mechanical circulatory support in patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock.
    Buda KG; Hryniewicz K; Eckman PM; Basir MB; Cowger JA; Alaswad K; Mukundan S; Sandoval Y; Elliott A; Brilakis ES; Megaly MS
    Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care; 2024 May; 13(5):390-397. PubMed ID: 38502888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cardiogenic Shock in Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy Versus Acute Myocardial Infarction: An 8-Year National Perspective on Clinical Characteristics, Management, and Outcomes.
    Vallabhajosyula S; Dunlay SM; Murphree DH; Barsness GW; Sandhu GS; Lerman A; Prasad A
    JACC Heart Fail; 2019 Jun; 7(6):469-476. PubMed ID: 31078481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. US trends of in-hospital morbidity and mortality for acute myocardial infarctions complicated by cardiogenic shock.
    Koester M; Dangl M; Albosta M; Grant J; Maning J; Colombo R
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2024 Jul; 64():44-51. PubMed ID: 38378376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mechanical Circulatory Support in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in the United States (from the National Inpatient Sample).
    Alkhalil A; Hajjar R; Ibrahim H; Ruiz CE
    Am J Cardiol; 2019 Nov; 124(10):1615-1620. PubMed ID: 31522773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mechanical circulatory support for early surgical repair of postinfarction ventricular septal defect with cardiogenic shock.
    Vondran M; Wehbe MS; Etz C; Ghazy T; Rastan AJ; Borger MA; Schroeter T
    Artif Organs; 2021 Mar; 45(3):244-253. PubMed ID: 32857884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Feasibility of early mechanical circulatory support in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: The Detroit cardiogenic shock initiative.
    Basir MB; Schreiber T; Dixon S; Alaswad K; Patel K; Almany S; Khandelwal A; Hanson I; George A; Ashbrook M; Blank N; Abdelsalam M; Sareen N; Timmis SBH; O'Neill Md WW
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Feb; 91(3):454-461. PubMed ID: 29266676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Trends, Predictors, and Outcomes of Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support for Postcardiac Surgery Cardiogenic Shock.
    Vallabhajosyula S; Arora S; Sakhuja A; Lahewala S; Kumar V; Shantha GPS; Egbe AC; Stulak JM; Gersh BJ; Gulati R; Rihal CS; Prasad A; Deshmukh AJ
    Am J Cardiol; 2019 Feb; 123(3):489-497. PubMed ID: 30473325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.