These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32472340)

  • 1. Computerized occlusal analysis of Essix and Hawley retainers used during the retention phase: a controlled clinical trial.
    Alkan Ö; Kaya Y; Keskin S
    J Orofac Orthop; 2020 Sep; 81(5):371-381. PubMed ID: 32472340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Changes in occlusal surface area and occlusal force distribution following the wear of vacuum-formed, hawley and bonded retainers: A controlled clinical trial.
    Alkan Ö; Kaya Y
    J Oral Rehabil; 2020 Jun; 47(6):766-774. PubMed ID: 32242981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Do orthodontic treatments using fixed appliances and clear aligner achieve comparable quality of occlusal contacts?
    Al-Dboush RE; Al-Zawawi E; El-Bialy T
    Evid Based Dent; 2022 Dec; 23(4):160-161. PubMed ID: 36526845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of the effects of modified and full-coverage thermoplastic retainers on occlusal contacts.
    Aslan BI; Dinçer M; Salmanli O; Qasem MA
    Orthodontics (Chic.); 2013; 14(1):e198-208. PubMed ID: 23646330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Occlusal contact area changes with different retention protocols: 1-year follow-up.
    Kara B; Yilmaz B
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2020 Apr; 157(4):533-541. PubMed ID: 32241360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of retention characteristics of Essix and Hawley retainers.
    Demir A; Babacan H; Nalcacı R; Topcuoglu T
    Korean J Orthod; 2012 Oct; 42(5):255-62. PubMed ID: 23173119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Changes in the distribution of occlusal forces in the course of the orthodontic retention phase : A prospective cohort study.
    Fritz F; Daratsianos N; Bourauel C; Papageorgiou SN; Jäger A
    J Orofac Orthop; 2023 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 37382657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Clinical evaluation of lingual fixed retainer combined with Hawley retainer and vacuum-formed retainer].
    Xu XC; Li RM; Tang GH
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2011 Dec; 20(6):623-6. PubMed ID: 22241313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Vacuum-formed retainers and bonded retainers for dental stabilization-a randomized controlled trial. Part II: patients' perceptions 6 and 18 months after orthodontic treatment.
    Krämer A; Sjöström M; Hallman M; Feldmann I
    Eur J Orthod; 2021 Apr; 43(2):136-143. PubMed ID: 32613244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of occlusal contacts with use of Hawley and clear overlay retainers.
    Sauget E; Covell DA; Boero RP; Lieber WS
    Angle Orthod; 1997; 67(3):223-30. PubMed ID: 9188967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. 3D-analysis of unwanted tooth movements despite bonded orthodontic retainers: a pilot study.
    Klaus K; Xirouchaki F; Ruf S
    BMC Oral Health; 2020 Nov; 20(1):308. PubMed ID: 33148238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative evaluation of salivary microbial levels and periodontal status of patients wearing fixed and removable orthodontic retainers.
    Eroglu AK; Baka ZM; Arslan U
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Aug; 156(2):186-192. PubMed ID: 31375228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Periodontal health and compliance: A comparison between Essix and Hawley retainers.
    Manzon L; Fratto G; Rossi E; Buccheri A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Jun; 153(6):852-860. PubMed ID: 29853243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effectiveness and acceptability of Essix and Begg retainers: a prospective study.
    Kumar AG; Bansal A
    Aust Orthod J; 2011 May; 27(1):52-6. PubMed ID: 21696115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Environmental sustainability of post-orthodontic dental retainers: a comparative life-cycle assessment of Hawley and Essix retainers.
    Da Tan TY; Duane B; Hussein A; Samsonova A; Sizun G; Shakerdi L; Taqi R; Wolfram S; Ziaeefard N; Sagheri D
    Eur J Orthod; 2024 Apr; 46(2):. PubMed ID: 38488436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Objective evaluation of compliance after orthodontic treatment using Hawley or vacuum-formed retainers: A 2-center randomized controlled trial over a 3-month period.
    Vagdouti G; Karvouni E; Bitsanis E; Koletsi D
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Dec; 156(6):717-726.e2. PubMed ID: 31784005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of thermoplastic retainers on Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus adhesion.
    Türköz C; Canigür Bavbek N; Kale Varlik S; Akça G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 May; 141(5):598-603. PubMed ID: 22554754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of thermoplastic retainers on occlusal contacts.
    Dinçer M; Isik Aslan B
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Feb; 32(1):6-10. PubMed ID: 19726491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparing the effects of Essix and Hawley retainers on the acoustics of speech.
    Atik E; Esen Aydinli F; Kulak Kayikçi ME; Ciger S
    Eur J Orthod; 2017 Aug; 39(4):440-445. PubMed ID: 27507127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of bonded and removable retainers on occlusal settling after orthodontic treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Shoukat Ali U; Zafar K; Hoshang Sukhia R; Fida M; Ahmed A
    Dent Med Probl; 2023; 60(2):327-334. PubMed ID: 37458399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.