201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32472877)
21. Retention and processing methods of nasal prosthesis.
Goiato MC; Mancuso DN; Zuccolotti BC; Murakawa AC; Lima DC; Santos DM; Andreotti AM
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2012 Nov; 22(11):716-9. PubMed ID: 23146853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. CAD/CAM-Assisted Auricular Prosthesis Fabrication for a Quick, Precise, and More Retentive Outcome: A Clinical Report.
Yadav S; Narayan AI; Choudhry A; Balakrishnan D
J Prosthodont; 2017 Oct; 26(7):616-621. PubMed ID: 28118503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The role of technology in facial prosthetics.
Davis BK
Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2010 Aug; 18(4):332-40. PubMed ID: 20543693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Orofacial rehabilitation with zygomatic implants: CAD-CAM bar and magnets for patients with nasal cancer after rhinectomy and partial maxillectomy.
King E; Abbott C; Dovgalski L; Owens J
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jun; 117(6):806-810. PubMed ID: 27863860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Three-dimensional printing in cardiology: Current applications and future challenges.
Luo H; Meyer-Szary J; Wang Z; Sabiniewicz R; Liu Y
Cardiol J; 2017; 24(4):436-444. PubMed ID: 28541602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. New Approach to 3D Printing of Facial Prostheses Using Combination of Open Source Software and Conventional Techniques: A Case Report.
B Jamayet N; J Abdullah Y; A Rajion Z; Husein A; K Alam M
Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 2017; 58(2):117-124. PubMed ID: 28724860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Computer-aided design and three-dimensional printing improves symmetry in heminasal reconstruction outcomes.
Yen CI; Zelken JA; Chang CS; Lo LJ; Yang JY; Chuang SS; Araniego CA; Hsiao YC
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2019 Jul; 72(7):1198-1206. PubMed ID: 30935873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Rehabilitation of the nose using CAD/CAM and rapid prototyping technology after ablative surgery of squamous cell carcinoma: a pilot clinical report.
Ciocca L; De Crescenzio F; Fantini M; Scotti R
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(4):808-12. PubMed ID: 20657878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Computer-aided design of facial prostheses by means of 3D-data acquisition and following symmetry analysis.
Bockey S; Berssenbrügge P; Dirksen D; Wermker K; Klein M; Runte C
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2018 Aug; 46(8):1320-1328. PubMed ID: 29866438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. 3D printing in dentistry.
Dawood A; Marti Marti B; Sauret-Jackson V; Darwood A
Br Dent J; 2015 Dec; 219(11):521-9. PubMed ID: 26657435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. An innovative total temporomandibular joint prosthesis with customized design and 3D printing additive fabrication: a prospective clinical study.
Zheng J; Chen X; Jiang W; Zhang S; Chen M; Yang C
J Transl Med; 2019 Jan; 17(1):4. PubMed ID: 30602388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Prosthesis-guided implant restoration of an auricular defect using computed tomography and 3-dimensional photographic imaging technologies: a clinical report.
Wang S; Leng X; Zheng Y; Zhang D; Wu G
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Feb; 113(2):152-6. PubMed ID: 25444284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Prosthetic reconstruction of a patient with an acquired nasal defect using extraoral implants and a CAD/CAM copy-milled bar.
Vera C; Barrero C; Shockley W; Rothenberger S; Minsley G; Drago C
J Prosthodont; 2014 Oct; 23(7):582-7. PubMed ID: 25041262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Three-dimensional Printing and 3D Slicer: Powerful Tools in Understanding and Treating Structural Lung Disease.
Cheng GZ; San Jose Estepar R; Folch E; Onieva J; Gangadharan S; Majid A
Chest; 2016 May; 149(5):1136-42. PubMed ID: 26976347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. PEEK Maxillary Obturator Prosthesis Fabrication Using Intraoral Scanning, 3D Printing, and CAD/CAM.
Tasopoulos T; Chatziemmanouil D; Kouveliotis G; Karaiskou G; Wang J; Zoidis P
Int J Prosthodont; 2020; 33(3):333-340. PubMed ID: 32320188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A review on computer-aided design and manufacturing of patient-specific maxillofacial implants.
Memon AR; Wang E; Hu J; Egger J; Chen X
Expert Rev Med Devices; 2020 Apr; 17(4):345-356. PubMed ID: 32105159
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. [Optimized fitting of a midface implant to anchor a magnetic nasal prosthesis using 3D printing].
Wrobel C; Keppeler D; Meyer AC
HNO; 2022 Mar; 70(3):200-205. PubMed ID: 34463790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Forehead Flap Templates for Nasal Reconstruction Digitally Developed From 2D and 3D Images.
Fishman Z; Whyne CM; Fialkov JA
J Craniofac Surg; 2022 Jan-Feb 01; 33(1):e78-e80. PubMed ID: 34967530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A Contemporary Review of the Role of Facial Prostheses in Complex Facial Reconstruction.
Slijepcevic AA; Afshari A; Vitale AE; Couch SM; Jeanpierre LM; Chi JJ
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2023 Feb; 151(2):288e-298e. PubMed ID: 36696329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Clinical applications of three-dimensional printing in otolaryngology-head and neck surgery: A systematic review.
Hong CJ; Giannopoulos AA; Hong BY; Witterick IJ; Irish JC; Lee J; Vescan A; Mitsouras D; Dang W; Campisi P; de Almeida JR; Monteiro E
Laryngoscope; 2019 Sep; 129(9):2045-2052. PubMed ID: 30698840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
