180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32473767)
1. Which is the most suitable local anaesthetic when inferior nerve blocks are used for impacted mandibular third molar extraction? A network meta-analysis.
Camps-Font O; Figueiredo R; Sánchez-Torres A; Clé-Ovejero A; Coulthard P; Gay-Escoda C; Valmaseda-Castellón E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2020 Nov; 49(11):1497-1507. PubMed ID: 32473767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Local anaesthesia for surgical extraction of mandibular third molars: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Yang F; Gao Y; Zhang L; Zheng B; Wang L; Sun H; Huang D
Clin Oral Investig; 2020 Nov; 24(11):3781-3800. PubMed ID: 32833132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Efficacy of local anaesthetic solutions on the success of inferior alveolar nerve block in patients with irreversible pulpitis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
Nagendrababu V; Pulikkotil SJ; Suresh A; Veettil SK; Bhatia S; Setzer FC
Int Endod J; 2019 Jun; 52(6):779-789. PubMed ID: 30638269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison Of Anaesthetic Efficacy Of Articaine And Lidocaine In Nonsurgical Endodontic Treatment Of Permanent Mandibular Molars With Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis. A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Khan Q; Noor N; Anayat N; Khan TS; Ahmed M
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2021; 33(2):192-197. PubMed ID: 34137527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of Anaesthetic Efficacy of 4% Articaine Primary Buccal Infiltration Versus 2% Lidocaine Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block in Symptomatic Mandibular First Molar Teeth.
Zain M; Rehman Khattak SU; Sikandar H; Shah SA; Fayyaz
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2016 Jan; 26(1):4-8. PubMed ID: 26787022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative study of the anaesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine versus 2% lidocaine with adrenaline during extraction of mandibular molars using an inferior alveolar nerve blocking technique.
Vishal G; Dandriyal R; Indra B N; Singh HP; Chaurasia A
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2021 Sep; 59(7):783-787. PubMed ID: 34301445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The efficacy and safety of articaine versus lignocaine in dental treatments: a meta-analysis.
Katyal V
J Dent; 2010 Apr; 38(4):307-17. PubMed ID: 20006669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Is it possible to extract lower third molars with infiltration anaesthesia techniques using articaine? A double-blind randomized clinical trial.
Figueiredo R; Sofos S; Soriano-Pons E; Camps-Font O; Sanmarti-García G; Gay-Escoda C; Valmaseda-Castellón E
Acta Odontol Scand; 2021 Jan; 79(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 32401086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative study of the anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine versus 2% lidocaine in inferior alveolar nerve block during surgical extraction of impacted lower third molars.
Sierra Rebolledo A; Delgado Molina E; Berini Aytís L; Gay Escoda C
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2007 Mar; 12(2):E139-44. PubMed ID: 17322803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Efficacy and Safety of Pulpal Anesthesia Strategies during Endodontic Treatment of Permanent Mandibular Molars with Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.
Zanjir M; Lighvan NL; Yarascavitch C; Beyene J; Shah PS; Azarpazhooh A
J Endod; 2019 Dec; 45(12):1435-1464.e10. PubMed ID: 31601433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Efficacy of Articaine versus Lidocaine in Supplemental Infiltration for Mandibular First versus Second Molars with Irreversible Pulpitis: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind Clinical Trial.
Shapiro MR; McDonald NJ; Gardner RJ; Peters MC; Botero TM
J Endod; 2018 Apr; 44(4):523-528. PubMed ID: 29397214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An in vivo, randomized, controlled comparative evaluation of efficacy, hemodynamic changes, and postoperative complications of 4% articaine using buccal infiltration and 2% lidocaine using inferior alveolar nerve block in mandibular primary molars of children aged 6 to 8 years.
Khanna SR; Rao D; Panwar S; Ameen S
Quintessence Int; 2021 Sep; 52(9):780-786. PubMed ID: 34076382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the efficacy of a standard inferior alveolar nerve block versus articaine infiltration for invasive dental treatment in permanent mandibular molars in children: a pilot study.
Jorgenson K; Burbridge L; Cole B
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2020 Feb; 21(1):171-177. PubMed ID: 31832992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Efficacy of buccal infiltration anaesthesia with articaine for extraction of mandibular molars: a clinical trial.
Rayati F; Noruziha A; Jabbarian R
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Sep; 56(7):607-610. PubMed ID: 29980352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative evaluation of anesthetic efficacy of inferior alveolar nerve block and inferior alveolar nerve block plus buccal or lingual infiltration using articaine in mandibular molars with irreversible pulpitis: a preliminary prospective randomized single-blind clinical trial.
Afkhami F; Pirmoazen S; Ardestani A; Fard MJK
Quintessence Int; 2021 Sep; 52(9):820-826. PubMed ID: 34369941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of different mandibular blocks for the removal of lower third molars: a meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials.
Cavallini CN; Toledano-Serrabona J; Gay-Escoda C
Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Apr; 25(4):2129-2139. PubMed ID: 32839834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Safety and efficacy of 4% articaine in mandibular third-molar extraction: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
Santos-Sanz L; Toledano-Serrabona J; Gay-Escoda C
J Am Dent Assoc; 2020 Dec; 151(12):912-923.e10. PubMed ID: 33228884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative Study of the Efficacy of 4% Articaine vs 2% Lidocaine in Surgical Removal of Bilaterally Impacted Mandibular Third Molars.
Mittal J; Kaur G; Mann HS; Narang S; Kamra M; Kapoor S; Sindhi M; Kataria R
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Jun; 19(6):743-748. PubMed ID: 29959306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. 4% articaine buccal infiltration versus 2% lidocaine inferior alveolar nerve block for emergency root canal treatment in mandibular molars with irreversible pulpits: a randomized clinical study.
Monteiro MR; Groppo FC; Haiter-Neto F; Volpato MC; Almeida JF
Int Endod J; 2015 Feb; 48(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 24702239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Can buccal infiltration of articaine replace traditional inferior alveolar nerve block for the treatment of mandibular molars in pediatric patients?: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Yu J; Liu S; Zhang X
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2021 Nov; 26(6):e754-e761. PubMed ID: 34564678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
