These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32473767)

  • 21. Comparison of Articaine and Lidocaine for Buccal Infiltration After Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block For Intraoperative Pain Control During Impacted Mandibular Third Molar Surgery.
    da Silva-Junior GP; de Almeida Souza LM; Groppo FC
    Anesth Prog; 2017; 64(2):80-84. PubMed ID: 28604089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparing anesthetic efficacy of articaine versus lidocaine as a supplemental buccal infiltration of the mandibular first molar after an inferior alveolar nerve block.
    Haase A; Reader A; Nusstein J; Beck M; Drum M
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2008 Sep; 139(9):1228-35. PubMed ID: 18762633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparative evaluation of anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine infiltration versus 2% lignocaine inferior alveolar nerve block for extraction of primary mandibular molars: A prospective, split-mouth, randomized controlled trial.
    Jain K; Katge F; Chimata VK; Patil D; Ghadge S; Bhanushali N
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2021; 39(4):409-415. PubMed ID: 35102967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Infiltrative local anesthesia with articaine is equally as effective as inferior alveolar nerve block with lidocaine for the removal of erupted molars.
    Venkat Narayanan J; Gurram P; Krishnan R; Muthusubramanian V; Sadesh Kannan V
    Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Sep; 21(3):295-299. PubMed ID: 28547078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Articaine buccal infiltration vs lidocaine inferior dental block - a review of the literature.
    Bartlett G; Mansoor J
    Br Dent J; 2016 Feb; 220(3):117-20. PubMed ID: 26868800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparing the anaesthetic efficacy of 1.8 mL and 3.6 mL of anaesthetic solution for inferior alveolar nerve blocks for teeth with irreversible pulpitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis.
    Nagendrababu V; Abbott PV; Pulikkotil SJ; Veettil SK; Dummer PMH
    Int Endod J; 2021 Mar; 54(3):331-342. PubMed ID: 33040335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The effect of pre-operative submucosal administration of dexamethasone, tramadol, articaine on the success rate of inferior alveolar nerve block on mandibular molars with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis: A randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial.
    Aksoy F; Ege B; Tosun S
    Int Endod J; 2021 Nov; 54(11):1982-1992. PubMed ID: 34347895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of anaesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine buccal infiltration versus 2% lidocaine inferior alveolar nerve block for pulpotomy in mandibular primary second molars.
    Daneshvar SH; Dorani D; Daneshvar MM
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2021; 39(3):299-302. PubMed ID: 34810348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Does articaine, rather than lidocaine, increase the risk of nerve damage when administered for inferior alveolar nerve blocks in patients undergoing local anaesthesia for dental treatment? A mini systematic review of the literature.
    Stirrup P; Crean S
    Br Dent J; 2019 Feb; 226(3):213-223. PubMed ID: 30734772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Anaesthetic Efficacy of 4% Articaine in Comparison with 2% Lidocaine as Intraligamentary Injections after an Ineffective Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block in Mandibular Molars with Irreversible Pulpitis: A Prospective Randomised Triple-Blind Clinical Trial.
    Zargar N; Shooshtari E; Pourmusavi L; Akbarzadeh Baghban A; Ashraf H; Parhizkar A
    Pain Res Manag; 2021; 2021():6668738. PubMed ID: 34055121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Articaine infiltration for anesthesia of mandibular first molars.
    Corbett IP; Kanaa MD; Whitworth JM; Meechan JG
    J Endod; 2008 May; 34(5):514-8. PubMed ID: 18436027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluation of Buccal Infiltration with Articaine and Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block with Lignocaine for Pulp Therapy in Mandibular Primary Molars.
    Chopra R; Marwaha M; Bansal K; Mittal M
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2016; 40(4):301-5. PubMed ID: 27471808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Re: Comparative study of the anaesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine versus 2% lidocaine with adrenaline during extraction of mandibular molars using an inferior alveolar nerve blocking technique.
    Crofts E; Williams J; Corsar K
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 May; 60(4):527. PubMed ID: 35120783
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Response letter to the "Letter to editor:" to our article - A Comparative study of the anaesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine versus 2% lidocaine with adrenaline during extraction of mandibular molars using an inferior alveolar nerve blocking technique.
    Vishal G; Dandriyal R; Indra BN; Singh HP; Chaurasia A
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 May; 60(4):528. PubMed ID: 35317934
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Anaesthetic efficacy of supplemental lingual infiltration of mandibular molars after inferior alveolar nerve block plus buccal infiltration in patients with irreversible pulpitis.
    Dou L; Luo J; Yang D
    Int Endod J; 2013 Jul; 46(7):660-5. PubMed ID: 23331081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Articaine buccal infiltration enhances the effectiveness of lidocaine inferior alveolar nerve block.
    Kanaa MD; Whitworth JM; Corbett IP; Meechan JG
    Int Endod J; 2009 Mar; 42(3):238-46. PubMed ID: 19228214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The effectiveness of an additional lingual infiltration in the pulpal anesthesia of mandibular teeth: a systematic review.
    Dou L; Luo J; Yang D; Wang Y
    Quintessence Int; 2013 May; 44(5):457-64. PubMed ID: 23479588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Efficacy and adverse events of 4% articaine compared with 2% lidocaine on primary molar extraction: A randomised controlled trial.
    Massignan C; Silveira Santos P; Cardoso M; Bolan M
    J Oral Rehabil; 2020 Aug; 47(8):1031-1040. PubMed ID: 32383196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The efficacy of supplemental intraseptal and buccal infiltration anesthesia in mandibular molars of patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis.
    Dianat O; Mozayeni MA; Layeghnejad MK; Shojaeian S
    Clin Oral Investig; 2020 Mar; 24(3):1281-1286. PubMed ID: 31302768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Efficacy of articaine versus lidocaine as a supplemental buccal infiltration in mandibular molars with irreversible pulpitis: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study.
    Rogers BS; Botero TM; McDonald NJ; Gardner RJ; Peters MC
    J Endod; 2014 Jun; 40(6):753-8. PubMed ID: 24862701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.