These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32473846)

  • 1. 30/80 MHz Bidirectional Dual-Frequency IVUS Feasibility Evaluated In Vivo and for Stent Imaging.
    Munding CE; Chérin E; Alves N; Goertz DE; Courtney BK; Foster FS
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2020 Aug; 46(8):2104-2112. PubMed ID: 32473846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dual-Element Intravascular Ultrasound Transducer for Tissue Harmonic Imaging and Frequency Compounding: Development and Imaging Performance Assessment.
    Lee J; Chang JH
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2019 Nov; 66(11):3146-3155. PubMed ID: 30835204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Development of a 3 French Dual-Frequency Intravascular Ultrasound Catheter.
    Munding CE; Chérin E; Jourard I; Weyers JJ; Goertz DE; Courtney BK; Foster FS
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2018 Jan; 44(1):251-266. PubMed ID: 29150363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In vivo volumetric analysis of coronary stent using optical coherence tomography with a novel balloon occlusion-flushing catheter: a comparison with intravascular ultrasound.
    Kawase Y; Hoshino K; Yoneyama R; McGregor J; Hajjar RJ; Jang IK; Hayase M
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2005 Oct; 31(10):1343-9. PubMed ID: 16223637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quantitative precision of optical frequency domain imaging: direct comparison with frequency domain optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound.
    Kobayashi Y; Kitahara H; Tanaka S; Okada K; Kimura T; Ikeno F; Yock PG; Fitzgerald PJ; Honda Y
    Cardiovasc Interv Ther; 2016 Apr; 31(2):79-88. PubMed ID: 26271203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Multi-frequency intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) imaging.
    Ma T; Yu M; Li J; Munding CE; Chen Z; Fei C; Shung KK; Zhou Q
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2015 Jan; 62(1):97-107. PubMed ID: 25585394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hybrid intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography catheter for imaging of coronary atherosclerosis.
    Li BH; Leung AS; Soong A; Munding CE; Lee H; Thind AS; Munce NR; Wright GA; Rowsell CH; Yang VX; Strauss BH; Foster FS; Courtney BK
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Feb; 81(3):494-507. PubMed ID: 22566368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In vivo comparison between optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound for detecting small degrees of in-stent neointima after stent implantation.
    Suzuki Y; Ikeno F; Koizumi T; Tio F; Yeung AC; Yock PG; Fitzgerald PJ; Fearon WF
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2008 Apr; 1(2):168-73. PubMed ID: 19463295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison between optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound in detecting neointimal healing patterns after stent implantation.
    Kochman J; Pietrasik A; Rdzanak A; Jąkała J; Zasada W; Scibisz A; Kołtowski L; Proniewska K; Pociask E; Legutko J
    Kardiol Pol; 2014; 72(6):534-40. PubMed ID: 24293141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An open system for intravascular ultrasound imaging.
    Qiu W; Chen Y; Li X; Yu Y; Cheng WF; Tsang FK; Zhou Q; Shung KK; Dai J; Sun L
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2012 Oct; 59(10):2201-9. PubMed ID: 23143570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of frequency-domain optical coherence tomography guidance for optimal coronary stent implantation in comparison with intravascular ultrasound guidance.
    Habara M; Nasu K; Terashima M; Kaneda H; Yokota D; Ko E; Ito T; Kurita T; Tanaka N; Kimura M; Ito T; Kinoshita Y; Tsuchikane E; Asakura K; Asakura Y; Katoh O; Suzuki T
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Apr; 5(2):193-201. PubMed ID: 22456026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of bioresorbable scaffold with a novel high-definition 60 MHz IVUS imaging system: Comparison with 40-MHz IVUS referenced to optical coherence tomography.
    Okada K; Kitahara H; Mitsutake Y; Tanaka S; Kimura T; Yock PG; Fitzgerald PJ; Ikeno F; Honda Y
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Apr; 91(5):874-883. PubMed ID: 28707349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison Between Optical Frequency Domain Imaging and Intravascular Ultrasound for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Guidance in Biolimus A9-Eluting Stent Implantation: A Randomized MISTIC-1 Non-Inferiority Trial.
    Muramatsu T; Ozaki Y; Nanasato M; Ishikawa M; Nagasaka R; Ohota M; Hashimoto Y; Yoshiki Y; Takatsu H; Ito K; Kamiya H; Yoshida Y; Murohara T; Izawa H;
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Nov; 13(11):e009314. PubMed ID: 33106049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Optical coherence tomography versus intravascular ultrasound in the evaluation of observer variability and reliability in the assessment of stent deployment: the OCTIVUS study.
    Magnus PC; Jayne JE; Garcia-Garcia HM; Swart M; van Es GA; Tijssen J; Kaplan AV
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Aug; 86(2):229-35. PubMed ID: 25620044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. IVUS analysis of the acute and long-term stent result using motorized pullback: intraobserver and interobserver variability.
    Regar E; Werner F; Klauss V; Siebert U; Henneke KH; Rieber J; König A; Theisen K; Mudra H
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 1999 Nov; 48(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 10525220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of Stent Expansion Guided by Optical Coherence Tomography Versus Intravascular Ultrasound: The ILUMIEN II Study (Observational Study of Optical Coherence Tomography [OCT] in Patients Undergoing Fractional Flow Reserve [FFR] and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention).
    Maehara A; Ben-Yehuda O; Ali Z; Wijns W; Bezerra HG; Shite J; Généreux P; Nichols M; Jenkins P; Witzenbichler B; Mintz GS; Stone GW
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Nov; 8(13):1704-14. PubMed ID: 26585621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Segmental vessel wall shear stress and neointimal formation after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation: physiological insights in a porcine coronary model.
    Carter AJ; Wei W; Gibson L; Collingwood R; Tio F; Dooley J; Kopia GA
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2005; 6(2):58-64. PubMed ID: 16263360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Porcine coronary imaging in vivo by optical coherence tomography.
    Tearney GJ; Jang IK; Kang DH; Aretz HT; Houser SL; Brady TJ; Schlendorf K; Shishkov M; Bouma BE
    Acta Cardiol; 2000 Aug; 55(4):233-7. PubMed ID: 11041121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intravascular ultrasound-guided drug-eluting stent implantation.
    Shlofmitz E; Kuku KO; Waksman R; Garcia-Garcia HM
    Minerva Cardioangiol; 2019 Aug; 67(4):306-317. PubMed ID: 30845795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A new intracoronary measurement catheter, MetriCath, compared to intravascular ultrasound and quantitative coronary angiography in a stented porcine coronary model.
    van der Giessen WJ; Carlier SG; Regar E; van Beusekom HM; Foley DP; de Feyter PJ; Verdouw PD; Boersma E; Wolthuis R; Serruys PW
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2002 Sep; 57(1):2-9; discussion 10-1. PubMed ID: 12203919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.