These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32474191)

  • 1. Outcomes of nerve-sparing laparoscopic sacropexy on one hundred fifteen cases.
    Serbetcioglu GC; Simsek SY; Alemdaroglu S; Aytac PC; Kalayci H; Celik H
    J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2020 Sep; 49(7):101795. PubMed ID: 32474191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Anatomical outcomes 1 year after pelvic organ prolapse surgery in patients with and without a uterus at a high risk of recurrence: a randomised controlled trial comparing laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy/cervicopexy and anterior vaginal mesh.
    Bataller E; Ros C; Anglès S; Gallego M; Espuña-Pons M; Carmona F
    Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Apr; 30(4):545-555. PubMed ID: 29987345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of Different Laparoscopic Sacropexy Procedures for Advanced Uterine Prolapse: A Retrospective Analysis.
    Yan L; Lu S; Zhao C; Lei L; Liu L
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2023 Apr; 30(4):300-307. PubMed ID: 36563872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical outcomes and complications of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with versus without concomitant hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse in Hong Kong Chinese patients after median follow-up of 7 years.
    Chan JCY; Yu CH; Go WW
    Int Urogynecol J; 2023 Jan; 34(1):271-278. PubMed ID: 36394632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effectiveness of two different laparoscopic surgeries for apical support of pelvic organ prolapse.
    Li S; Ji M; Zhao Z
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 May; 188():74-8. PubMed ID: 25801721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Mid-term efficacy of laparoscopic sacral colpopexy of combined transabdominal-transvaginal approach in the treatment of stage Ⅳ pelvic organ prolapse].
    Liang XZ; Xu LZ; Chen LQ; Wang S; Lin XT; Zhang XW
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Mar; 54(3):160-165. PubMed ID: 30893716
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Study on mesh-augmented vaginal reconstructive surgery in treatment of pelvic organ prolapse].
    Han JS; Zhang K; Zhu FL; Yao Y; Liang HM; Zhou LF; Guo HY
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Feb; 46(2):101-4. PubMed ID: 21426766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Success rates and outcomes of laparoscopic mesh sacrohysteropexy.
    Daniels S; Robson D; Palacz M; Howell S; Nguyen T; Behnia-Willison F
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2020 Apr; 60(2):244-249. PubMed ID: 31840811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Comparison outcomes of three surgical procedures in treatment of severe pelvic organ prolapse and analysis of risk factors for genital prolapse recurrence].
    Hu CD; Chen YS; Yi XF; Ding JX; Feng WW; Yao LQ; Huang J; Zhang Y; Hu WG; Zhu ZL; Hua KQ
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Feb; 46(2):94-100. PubMed ID: 21426765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparing laparoscopic and robotic sacrocolpopexy surgical outcomes with prior versus concomitant hysterectomy.
    Dubinskaya A; Hernandez-Aranda D; Wakefield DB; Shepherd JP
    Int Urogynecol J; 2020 Feb; 31(2):401-407. PubMed ID: 31256223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Laparoscopic Y-shaped polypropylene mesh for uterine and vaginal vault prolapse].
    Li M; Feng Y; Jin S; Yu D
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Sep; 27(9):1106-9. PubMed ID: 24279025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Safety and perioperative morbidity of laparoscopic sacropexy: a systematic analysis and a comparison with laparoscopic hysterectomy.
    Joukhadar R; Baum S; Radosa J; Gerlinger C; Hamza A; Juhasz-Böss I; Solomayer EF
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2017 Mar; 295(3):641-649. PubMed ID: 27896472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Modified laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with mesh for severe pelvic organ prolapse.
    Zhu L; Sun Z; Yu M; Li B; Li X; Lang J
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2013 May; 121(2):170-2. PubMed ID: 23415023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Laparoscopic management of pelvic organ prolapse recurrence after open sacrocervicopexy.
    Grinstein E; Gluck O; Veit-Rubin N; Deval B
    Int Urogynecol J; 2020 Sep; 31(9):1965-1968. PubMed ID: 32222793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Outcomes of laparoscopic sacropexy in women over 70: A comparative study.
    Boudy AS; Thubert T; Vinchant M; Hermieu JF; Villefranque V; Deffieux X
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Dec; 207():178-183. PubMed ID: 27865942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Uterine-sparing laparoscopic lateral suspension in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.
    Kumbasar S; Salman S; Sogut O; K Gencer F; Bacak HB; Tezcan AD; Timur GY
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2023 Jan; 49(1):341-349. PubMed ID: 36196844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Outcomes of laparoscopic management of multicompartmental pelvic organ prolapse.
    Martín Del Olmo JC; Toledano M; Martín Esteban ML; Montenegro MA; Gómez JR; Concejo P; Rodríguez de Castro M; Del Rio F
    Surg Endosc; 2019 Apr; 33(4):1075-1079. PubMed ID: 29998390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. What to Do With Recurrent Prolapse After Vaginal Mesh Failure?
    Norinho de Oliveira P; Bourdel N; Rabischong B; Canis M; Botchorishvili R
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016 Feb; 23(2):161-2. PubMed ID: 26408228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site compared with robotic multi-port sacrocolpopexy for apical compartment prolapse.
    Matanes E; Boulus S; Lauterbach R; Amit A; Weiner Z; Lowenstein L
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Apr; 222(4):358.e1-358.e11. PubMed ID: 31589864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Laparoscopic Cerclage Sacrohysteropexy: Comparing a Novel Technique for Sacrohysteropexy to Traditional Supracervical Hysterectomy and Sacrocervicopexy.
    Armstrong KL; Modest AM; Rosenblatt PL
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2021 Feb; 27(2):e315-e320. PubMed ID: 32675629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.