These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32474249)

  • 21. An optimised eDNA protocol for detecting fish in lentic and lotic freshwaters using a small water volume.
    Muha TP; Robinson CV; Garcia de Leaniz C; Consuegra S
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(7):e0219218. PubMed ID: 31314760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The effect of filtration method on the efficiency of environmental DNA capture and quantification via metabarcoding.
    Li J; Lawson Handley LJ; Read DS; Hänfling B
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2018 May; ():. PubMed ID: 29766663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Development and Testing of Species-Specific Primers for Detecting the Presence of the Northern Pacific Sea Star (Asterias amurensis) from Environmental DNA.
    Yang C; Du Y; Zeng X; Ni G
    Mar Biotechnol (NY); 2024 Apr; 26(2):215-222. PubMed ID: 38341825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Can nuclear aquatic environmental DNA be a genetic marker for the accurate estimation of species abundance?
    Jo TS; Tsuri K; Yamanaka H
    Naturwissenschaften; 2022 Jul; 109(4):38. PubMed ID: 35861927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A practical guide to sample preservation and pre-PCR processing of aquatic environmental DNA.
    Kumar G; Eble JE; Gaither MR
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2020 Jan; 20(1):29-39. PubMed ID: 31633859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The particle size distribution of environmental DNA varies with species and degradation.
    Zhao B; van Bodegom PM; Trimbos K
    Sci Total Environ; 2021 Nov; 797():149175. PubMed ID: 34303977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparative evaluation for the performance of environmental DNA and RNA analyses targeting mitochondrial and nuclear genes from ayu (Plecoglossus altivelis).
    Jo TS; Matsuda N; Hirohara T; Yamanaka H
    Environ Monit Assess; 2024 Mar; 196(4):374. PubMed ID: 38491297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Fish eDNA detection and its technical optimization: A case study of Acanthopagrus latus.
    Sun M; Guo Y; Zhao N; Zhang S; Pei K; Qin C
    Mar Environ Res; 2022 Apr; 176():105588. PubMed ID: 35298940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Design and Validation of Passive Environmental DNA Samplers Using Granular Activated Carbon and Montmorillonite Clay.
    Kirtane A; Atkinson JD; Sassoubre L
    Environ Sci Technol; 2020 Oct; 54(19):11961-11970. PubMed ID: 32659082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Assessment of fish communities using environmental DNA: Effect of spatial sampling design in lentic systems of different sizes.
    Zhang S; Lu Q; Wang Y; Wang X; Zhao J; Yao M
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2020 Jan; 20(1):242-255. PubMed ID: 31625686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparing the efficiency of open and enclosed filtration systems in environmental DNA quantification for fish and jellyfish.
    Takahashi S; Sakata MK; Minamoto T; Masuda R
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(4):e0231718. PubMed ID: 32310994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Nuclear eDNA estimates population allele frequencies and abundance in experimental mesocosms and field samples.
    Andres KJ; Sethi SA; Lodge DM; Andrés J
    Mol Ecol; 2021 Feb; 30(3):685-697. PubMed ID: 33433059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Investigating the distribution of the Yangtze finless porpoise in the Yangtze River using environmental DNA.
    Tang Y; Wu Y; Liu K; Li J; Li H; Wang Q; Yu J; Xu P
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(8):e0221120. PubMed ID: 31398225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Genome-scale target capture of mitochondrial and nuclear environmental DNA from water samples.
    Jensen MR; Sigsgaard EE; Liu S; Manica A; Bach SS; Hansen MM; Møller PR; Thomsen PF
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2021 Apr; 21(3):690-702. PubMed ID: 33179423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Protocol optimization of eDNA analysis workflow for detecting Hucho bleekeri.].
    Jiang W; Wang QJ; Deng J; Zhao H; Kong F; Zhang HX
    Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2016 Jul; 27(7):2372-2378. PubMed ID: 29737148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Terrestrial mammal surveillance using hybridization capture of environmental DNA from African waterholes.
    Seeber PA; McEwen GK; Löber U; Förster DW; East ML; Melzheimer J; Greenwood AD
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2019 Nov; 19(6):1486-1496. PubMed ID: 31349392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Filtration recovery of extracellular DNA from environmental water samples.
    Liang Z; Keeley A
    Environ Sci Technol; 2013 Aug; 47(16):9324-31. PubMed ID: 23869402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evaluating the sampling effort for the metabarcoding-based detection of fish environmental DNA in the open ocean.
    Kawakami T; Yamazaki A; Asami M; Goto Y; Yamanaka H; Hyodo S; Ueno H; Kasai A
    Ecol Evol; 2023 Mar; 13(3):e9921. PubMed ID: 36969932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Remote, autonomous real-time monitoring of environmental DNA from commercial fish.
    Hansen BK; Jacobsen MW; Middelboe AL; Preston CM; Marin R; Bekkevold D; Knudsen SW; Møller PR; Nielsen EE
    Sci Rep; 2020 Aug; 10(1):13272. PubMed ID: 32764624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Multicellular species environmental DNA (eDNA) research constrained by overfocus on mitochondrial DNA.
    McCauley M; Koda SA; Loesgen S; Duffy DJ
    Sci Total Environ; 2024 Feb; 912():169550. PubMed ID: 38142009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.