155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32474714)
1. Agreement in central corneal thickness measurement between Corvis ST and ocular response analyzer.
Salouti R; Razeghinejad R; Masihpour N; Ghoreyshi M; Nowroozzadeh MH
Int Ophthalmol; 2020 Oct; 40(10):2563-2567. PubMed ID: 32474714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of a novel Scheimpflug-based non-contact tonometer in healthy subjects and patients with ocular hypertension and glaucoma.
Reznicek L; Muth D; Kampik A; Neubauer AS; Hirneiss C
Br J Ophthalmol; 2013 Nov; 97(11):1410-4. PubMed ID: 23969314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of corneal biomechanics, tonometry and pachymetry with the Corvis ST in myopia.
Wang X; McAlinden C; Zhang H; Yan J; Wang D; Wei W; Mi S
Sci Rep; 2021 Feb; 11(1):3041. PubMed ID: 33542296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effectiveness of the Goldmann Applanation Tonometer, the Dynamic Contour Tonometer, the Ocular Response Analyzer and the Corvis ST in Measuring Intraocular Pressure following FS-LASIK.
Bao F; Huang W; Zhu R; Lu N; Wang Y; Li H; Wu S; Lin H; Wang J; Zheng X; Huang J; Li Y; Wang Q; Elsheikh A
Curr Eye Res; 2020 Feb; 45(2):144-152. PubMed ID: 31869261
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of Central Corneal Thickness Using Corneal Dynamic Scheimpflug Analyzer Corvis ST and Comparison with Pentacam Rotating Scheimpflug System and Ultrasound Pachymetry in Normal Eyes.
Yu A; Zhao W; Savini G; Huang Z; Bao F; Lu W; Wang Q; Huang J
J Ophthalmol; 2015; 2015():767012. PubMed ID: 26697213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Corneal Deformation Parameters Provided by the Corvis-ST Pachy-Tonometer in Healthy Subjects and Glaucoma Patients.
Salvetat ML; Zeppieri M; Tosoni C; Felletti M; Grasso L; Brusini P
J Glaucoma; 2015; 24(8):568-74. PubMed ID: 25318572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical Evaluation of Methods to Correct Intraocular Pressure Measurements by the Goldmann Applanation Tonometer, Ocular Response Analyzer, and Corvis ST Tonometer for the Effects of Corneal Stiffness Parameters.
Bao F; Huang Z; Huang J; Wang J; Deng M; Li L; Yu A; Wang Q; Elsheikh A
J Glaucoma; 2016 Jun; 25(6):510-9. PubMed ID: 26709500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of biomechanically corrected intraocular pressure using Corvis ST and comparison of the Corvis ST, noncontact tonometer, and Goldmann applanation tonometer in patients with glaucoma.
Nakao Y; Kiuchi Y; Okumichi H
PLoS One; 2020; 15(9):e0238395. PubMed ID: 32966284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A cross-sectional study to compare intraocular pressure measurement by sequential use of Goldman applanation tonometry, dynamic contour tonometry, ocular response analyzer, and Corvis ST.
Tejwani S; Dinakaran S; Joshi A; Shetty R; Sinha Roy A
Indian J Ophthalmol; 2015 Nov; 63(11):815-20. PubMed ID: 26669331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Relationship Between Corvis ST Tonometry Parameters and Ocular Response Analyzer Corneal Hysteresis.
Fujishiro T; Matsuura M; Fujino Y; Murata H; Tokumo K; Nakakura S; Kiuchi Y; Asaoka R
J Glaucoma; 2020 Jun; 29(6):479-484. PubMed ID: 32134829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of diabetes mellitus on Corvis ST measurement process.
Pérez-Rico C; Gutiérrez-Ortíz C; González-Mesa A; Zandueta AM; Moreno-Salgueiro A; Germain F
Acta Ophthalmol; 2015 May; 93(3):e193-8. PubMed ID: 25270375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of different devices to measure the intraocular pressure in thyroid-associated orbitopathy.
Kuebler AG; Wiecha C; Reznicek L; Klingenstein A; Halfter K; Priglinger S; Hintschich C
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2019 Sep; 257(9):2025-2032. PubMed ID: 31222404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intraocular Pressure Before and After Corneal Refractive Surgery: A Prospective Comparison of Corvis ST and Ocular Response Analyzer.
Salouti R; Azimi A; Meshksar A; Takapouy R; Ghoreyshi M; Salouti K; Razeghinejad R; Nowroozzadeh MH
J Glaucoma; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38767500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Agreement of ocular response analyzer cornea compensated IOP with corvis ST biomechanical IOP following Femtosecond Laser-assisted LASIK.
Salouti R; Razeghinejad R; Eslami G; Zare M; Salouti K; Ghoreyshi M; Nowroozzadeh MH
Eye (Lond); 2023 Feb; 37(2):263-266. PubMed ID: 35013609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Evaluation of corneal biomechanical properties in glaucoma and control patients by dynamic Scheimpflug corneal imaging technology].
Coste V; Schweitzer C; Paya C; Touboul D; Korobelnik JF
J Fr Ophtalmol; 2015 Jun; 38(6):504-13. PubMed ID: 25976131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Corneal thickness- and age-related biomechanical properties of the cornea measured with the ocular response analyzer.
Kotecha A; Elsheikh A; Roberts CR; Zhu H; Garway-Heath DF
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Dec; 47(12):5337-47. PubMed ID: 17122122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Changes in intraocular pressure values measured with noncontact tonometer (NCT), ocular response analyzer (ORA) and corvis scheimpflug technology tonometer (CST) in the early phase after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).
Shen Y; Su X; Liu X; Miao H; Fang X; Zhou X
BMC Ophthalmol; 2016 Nov; 16(1):205. PubMed ID: 27863469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of intraocular pressure measurements between Easyton transpalpebral tonometry and Perkins, iCare iC100 and Corvis ST, and the influence of corneal and anterior scleral thickness.
Salazar-Quiñones L; Fernández-Vigo JI; Pérez-Quiñones Y; Montolío-Marzo E; García-Bella J; Morales-Fernandez L; Sánchez-Del-Hoyo R; García-Feijóo J; Martínez-de-la-Casa JM
Int Ophthalmol; 2023 Nov; 43(11):4121-4129. PubMed ID: 37632576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Relationship between novel intraocular pressure measurement from Corvis ST and central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis.
Matsuura M; Murata H; Fujino Y; Yanagisawa M; Nakao Y; Tokumo K; Nakakura S; Kiuchi Y; Asaoka R
Br J Ophthalmol; 2020 Apr; 104(4):563-568. PubMed ID: 31362932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intraocular pressure measurement precision with the Goldmann applanation, dynamic contour, and ocular response analyzer tonometers.
Kotecha A; White E; Schlottmann PG; Garway-Heath DF
Ophthalmology; 2010 Apr; 117(4):730-7. PubMed ID: 20122737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
