BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32474764)

  • 21. Combined multiple clinical characteristics for prediction of discordance in grade and stage in prostate cancer patients undergoing systematic biopsy and radical prostatectomy.
    Liu H; Tang K; Xia D; Peng E; Wang L; Chen Z
    Pathol Res Pract; 2020 Nov; 216(11):153235. PubMed ID: 33035728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Prostate Cancer Antigen 3 Score Does Not Predict for Adverse Pathologic Features at Radical Prostatectomy or for Progression-free Survival in Clinically Localized, Intermediate- and High-risk Prostate Cancer.
    Hegde JV; Veruttipong D; Said JW; Reiter RE; Steinberg ML; King CR; Kishan AU
    Urology; 2017 Sep; 107():171-177. PubMed ID: 28552819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evaluation of MR elastography for prediction of lymph node metastasis in prostate cancer.
    Hu B; Deng Y; Chen J; Kuang S; Tang W; He B; Zhang L; Xiao Y; Chen J; Rossman P; Arani A; Yin Z; Glaser KJ; Yin M; Venkatesh SK; Ehman RL; Wang J
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2021 Jul; 46(7):3387-3400. PubMed ID: 33651125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. One-Stop-Shop Whole-Body
    Thalgott M; Düwel C; Rauscher I; Heck MM; Haller B; Gafita A; Gschwend JE; Schwaiger M; Maurer T; Eiber M
    J Nucl Med; 2018 Dec; 59(12):1850-1856. PubMed ID: 29794224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Outcomes for Patients with Clinical Lymphadenopathy Treated with Radical Prostatectomy.
    Moschini M; Briganti A; Murphy CR; Bianchi M; Gandaglia G; Montorsi F; Quevedo JF; Carlson R; Kwon E; Karnes RJ
    Eur Urol; 2016 Feb; 69(2):193-6. PubMed ID: 26264160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of extracapsular invasion and other staging parameters in patients with prostate cancer candidates for radical prostatectomy.
    Lista F; Gimbernat H; Cáceres F; Rodríguez-Barbero JM; Castillo E; Angulo JC
    Actas Urol Esp; 2014 Jun; 38(5):290-7. PubMed ID: 24387827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The ability of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density to predict an upgrade in Gleason score between initial prostate biopsy and prostatectomy diminishes with increasing tumour grade due to reduced PSA secretion per unit tumour volume.
    Corcoran NM; Casey RG; Hong MK; Pedersen J; Connolly S; Peters J; Harewood L; Gleave ME; Costello AJ; Hovens CM; Goldenberg SL
    BJU Int; 2012 Jul; 110(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 22085203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Role of PI-RADS Version 2 for Prediction of Upgrading in Biopsy-Proven Prostate Cancer With Gleason Score 6.
    Song W; Bang SH; Jeon HG; Jeong BC; Seo SI; Jeon SS; Choi HY; Kim CK; Lee HM
    Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2018 Aug; 16(4):281-287. PubMed ID: 29550198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The Impact of Magnetic Resonance Imaging on Prediction of Extraprostatic Extension and Prostatectomy Outcome in Patients with Low-, Intermediate- and High-Risk Prostate Cancer: Try to Find a Standard.
    Radtke JP; Hadaschik BA; Wolf MB; Freitag MT; Schwab C; Alt C; Roth W; Duensing S; Pahernik SA; Roethke MC; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Teber D
    J Endourol; 2015 Dec; 29(12):1396-405. PubMed ID: 26154571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. External validation of the updated nomogram predicting lymph node invasion in patients with prostate cancer undergoing extended pelvic lymph node dissection.
    Gacci M; Schiavina R; Lanciotti M; Masieri L; Serni S; Vagnoni V; Abdollah F; Carini M; Martorana G; Montorsi F
    Urol Int; 2013; 90(3):277-82. PubMed ID: 23296120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. PI-RADS version 2 for prediction of pathological downgrading after radical prostatectomy: a preliminary study in patients with biopsy-proven Gleason Score 7 (3+4) prostate cancer.
    Woo S; Kim SY; Lee J; Kim SH; Cho JY
    Eur Radiol; 2016 Oct; 26(10):3580-7. PubMed ID: 26847042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Use of the Prostate Health Index for the Detection of Aggressive Prostate Cancer at Radical Prostatectomy.
    Mearini L; Nunzi E; Ferri C; Bellezza G; Lolli C; Porrozzi C; Porena M
    Urol Int; 2015; 95(4):390-9. PubMed ID: 25792149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The Key Combined Value of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted and Concomitant Systematic Biopsies for the Prediction of Adverse Pathological Features in Prostate Cancer Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy.
    Gandaglia G; Ploussard G; Valerio M; Mattei A; Fiori C; Roumiguié M; Fossati N; Stabile A; Beauval JB; Malavaud B; Scuderi S; Barletta F; Moschini M; Zamboni S; Rakauskas A; Tian Z; Karakiewicz PI; De Cobelli F; Porpiglia F; Montorsi F; Briganti A
    Eur Urol; 2020 Jun; 77(6):733-741. PubMed ID: 31547938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Preoperative neural network using combined magnetic resonance imaging variables, prostate-specific antigen, and gleason score for predicting prostate cancer biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
    Poulakis V; Witzsch U; de Vries R; Emmerlich V; Meves M; Altmannsberger HM; Becht E
    Urology; 2004 Dec; 64(6):1165-70. PubMed ID: 15596191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Multiparametric MRI in detection and staging of prostate cancer.
    Boesen L
    Dan Med J; 2017 Feb; 64(2):. PubMed ID: 28157066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Measurements of peri-prostatic adipose tissue by MRI predict bone metastasis in patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer.
    Liu BH; Mao YH; Li XY; Luo RX; Zhu WA; Su HB; Zeng HD; Chen CH; Zhao X; Zou C; Luo Y
    Front Oncol; 2024; 14():1393650. PubMed ID: 38737904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Magnetic resonance imaging-transectal ultrasound image-fusion biopsies accurately characterize the index tumor: correlation with step-sectioned radical prostatectomy specimens in 135 patients.
    Baco E; Ukimura O; Rud E; Vlatkovic L; Svindland A; Aron M; Palmer S; Matsugasumi T; Marien A; Bernhard JC; Rewcastle JC; Eggesbø HB; Gill IS
    Eur Urol; 2015 Apr; 67(4):787-94. PubMed ID: 25240973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Prostate-specific antigen improves the ability of clinical stage and biopsy Gleason sum to predict the pathologic stage at radical prostatectomy in the new millennium.
    Chun FK; Briganti A; Gallina A; Hutterer GC; Shariat SF; Antebie E; Walz J; Roehrborn CG; Salonia A; Rigatti P; Saad F; Huland H; Montorsi F; Graefen M; Karakiewicz PI
    Eur Urol; 2007 Oct; 52(4):1067-74. PubMed ID: 17383807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Prediction of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy with PI-RADS version 2 in prostate cancers: initial results.
    Park SY; Oh YT; Jung DC; Cho NH; Choi YD; Rha KH; Hong SJ
    Eur Radiol; 2016 Aug; 26(8):2502-9. PubMed ID: 26560721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A multivariable analysis of clinical factors predicting for pathological features associated with local failure after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
    D'Amico AV; Whittington R; Malkowicz SB; Schnall M; Tomaszewski J; Schultz D; Kao G; VanArsdalen K; Wein A
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1994 Sep; 30(2):293-302. PubMed ID: 7928457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.