171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32474997)
1. Accuracy of a high-intensity focused ultrasound device with and without real-time visualization system in face and neck treatment of skin laxity.
Vachiramon V; Techakajornkeart R; Leerunyakul K; Chayavichitsilp P
J Cosmet Dermatol; 2021 Jan; 20(1):132-137. PubMed ID: 32474997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Randomized, Split-Face, Evaluator-Blind Clinical Trial Comparing Monopolar Radiofrequency Versus Microfocused Ultrasound With Visualization for Lifting and Tightening of the Face and Upper Neck.
Alhaddad M; Wu DC; Bolton J; Wilson MJ; Jones IT; Boen M; Goldman MP
Dermatol Surg; 2019 Jan; 45(1):131-139. PubMed ID: 30531187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Efficacy and Safety of Microfocused Ultrasound With Visualization in Abdominal Skin Laxity: A Randomized, Comparative Study.
Vachiramon V; Triyangkulsri K; Iamsumang W; Chayavichitsilp P
Lasers Surg Med; 2020 Nov; 52(9):831-836. PubMed ID: 32173882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparing the Safety and Effectiveness of Microfocused Ultrasound: Standard vs Targeted Tissue Protocol in Lifting and Tightening the Lower Face and Upper Neck.
Wood E; Gonzalez A; Almukhtar R; Fletcher L; Fabi S
J Drugs Dermatol; 2024 Apr; 23(4):249-254. PubMed ID: 38564386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A Randomized Evaluator-Blinded Trial Comparing Subsurface Monopolar Radiofrequency With Microfocused Ultrasound for Lifting and Tightening of the Neck.
Jones IT; Guiha I; Goldman MP; Wu DC
Dermatol Surg; 2017 Dec; 43(12):1441-1447. PubMed ID: 28902019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A Systematic Review of the Efficacy of Microfocused Ultrasound for Facial Skin Tightening.
Contini M; Hollander MHJ; Vissink A; Schepers RH; Jansma J; Schortinghuis J
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2023 Jan; 20(2):. PubMed ID: 36674277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of Micro-Focused Ultrasound for Lifting and Tightening Neck Laxity.
Baumann L; Zelickson B
J Drugs Dermatol; 2016 May; 15(5):607-14. PubMed ID: 27168269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quantitative Analysis of Face and Neck Skin Tightening by Microfocused Ultrasound With Visualization in Asians.
Lu PH; Yang CH; Chang YC
Dermatol Surg; 2017 Nov; 43(11):1332-1338. PubMed ID: 28945618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Patient satisfaction of microfocused ultrasound treatments on the face and neck laxity: A narrative review.
Al-Omair A; Bukhari A
J Cosmet Dermatol; 2023 Oct; 22(10):2671-2676. PubMed ID: 37128835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Retrospective evaluation of micro-focused ultrasound for lifting and tightening the face and neck.
Fabi SG; Goldman MP
Dermatol Surg; 2014 May; 40(5):569-75. PubMed ID: 24689931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Single-Plane Versus Dual-Plane Microfocused Ultrasound With Visualization in the Treatment of Upper Arm Skin Laxity: A Randomized, Single-Blinded, Controlled Trial.
Vachiramon V; Triyangkulsri K; Iamsumang W; Chayavichitsilp P
Lasers Surg Med; 2021 Apr; 53(4):476-481. PubMed ID: 32770693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of microfocused ultrasound for improving skin laxity in the lower face: A retrospective study.
Yalici-Armagan B; Elcin G
Dermatol Ther; 2020 Nov; 33(6):e14132. PubMed ID: 32770566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Safety of Microfocused Ultrasound With Visualization in Patients With Fitzpatrick Skin Phototypes III to VI.
Harris MO; Sundaram HA
JAMA Facial Plast Surg; 2015; 17(5):355-7. PubMed ID: 26313402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Microfocused ultrasound with visualization: Consensus on safety and review of energy-based devices.
Pavicic T; Ballard JR; Bykovskaya T; Corduff N; Hirano C; Park JY; Saromytskaya A; Sevi J; Vasconcelos S
J Cosmet Dermatol; 2022 Feb; 21(2):636-647. PubMed ID: 34951735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Optimizing Patient Outcomes by Customizing Treatment With Microfocused Ultrasound With Visualization: Gold Standard Consensus Guidelines from an Expert Panel.
Fabi SG; Joseph J; Sevi J; Green JB; Peterson JD
J Drugs Dermatol; 2019 May; 18(5):426-432. PubMed ID: 31141851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of microfocused ultrasound with visualization for skin laxity among vegan and omnivore patients.
Fusano M; Galimberti MG; Bencini M; Fusano I; Bencini PL
J Cosmet Dermatol; 2021 Sep; 20(9):2769-2774. PubMed ID: 33533546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Safety and efficacy of combining microfocused ultrasound with fractional CO2 laser resurfacing for lifting and tightening the face and neck.
Woodward JA; Fabi SG; Alster T; Colón-Acevedo B
Dermatol Surg; 2014 Dec; 40 Suppl 12():S190-3. PubMed ID: 25417574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Facial Skin Tightening With Microfocused Ultrasound and Dermal Fillers: Considerations for Patient Selection and Outcomes.
Casabona G; Kaye K
J Drugs Dermatol; 2019 Nov; 18(11):1075-1082. PubMed ID: 31738490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effectiveness of combined microfocused ultrasound with visualization and subdermal calcium hydroxyapatite injections for the management of brachial skin laxity.
Ramirez S; Puah IBK
J Cosmet Dermatol; 2021 Dec; 20(12):3871-3879. PubMed ID: 34716645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Microfocused Ultrasound for Skin Tightening.
Gutowski KA
Clin Plast Surg; 2016 Jul; 43(3):577-82. PubMed ID: 27363772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
